So, to review, if a woman has second thoughts about a tryst a few days later, she can, without penalty, ruin a man financially and send him to prison for 15 years. ‘Feminists’ consider this acceptable. At the same time, even though men consider being cuckolded a worse fate than being raped, ‘feminists’ want to make this easier for a woman to do, by preventing paternity testing. They already have rigged laws so that the man, upon ‘no fault’ divorce, has to pay alimony, to a woman who cuckolded him.
This is pure evil, ranking right up there with the worst tyrannies of the last century. Modern misandry masking itself as ‘feminism’ is, without equal, the most hypocritical ideology in the world today. The laws of a society are the DNA of that society. Once the laws are tainted, the DNA is effectively corrupted, and mutations to the society soon follow. Men have been killed due to ‘feminism’. Children and fathers have been forcibly separated for financial gain via ‘feminism’. Slavery has returned to the West via ‘feminism’.
Shaming Language and Projection as a Substitute for Rational Debate : As discussed previously, any legitimate and polite questions about the fairness of anti-male realities in the legal system and media are quickly met with Pavlovian retorts of ‘misogynist’ and ‘loser’.
Another bit I liked:
Lastly, the religious ‘social conservatives’ who continue their empty sermonizing about the ‘sanctity of marriage’ while doing absolutely nothing about the divorce-incentivizing turn that the laws have taken, have been exposed for their pseudo-moral posturing and willful blindness. What they claim to be of utmost importance to them has been destroyed right under their noses, and they still are too dimwitted to comprehend why. No other interest group in America has been such a total failure at their own stated mission. To be duped into believing that a side-issue like ‘gay marriage’ is a mortal threat to traditional marriage, yet miss the legal changes that correlate to a rise in divorce rates by creating incentives for divorce (divorce being what destroys marriage, rather than a tiny number of gays), is about as egregious an oversight as an astronomer failing to be aware of the existence of the Moon. Aren’t conservatives the people who are supposed to grasp that incentives drive behavior? An article worthy of being written by The Onion could conceivably be titled ‘Social conservatives carefully seek to maintain perfect 100% record of failure in advancing their agenda’.
Another good bit. It explains why current male/female conditions are a bubble. Look at the charts on the site for more information.
Lefto-‘feminists’ will be outbred and replaced very quickly, and rural American conservatives will be the only resiliently youthful population among all the world’s white ethnicities. The state that lefto-‘feminists’ so admire will quickly turn on them once the state calculates that these women are neither producing new taxpayers nor new technologies, and will find a way to demote them from their present ’empowered’ position of entitlement. If they thought having obligations to a husband was such an awful prospect, wait until they have obligations to the husband-substitute state.
From The Misandry Bubble. Read the whole thing.
Also see his latest on the subject: It is Time to Expose Misandry
Cross Posted at Power and Control
Comments
4 responses to “They Declared War On Men”
The state that lefto-’feminists’ so admire will quickly turn on them once the state calculates that these women are neither producing new taxpayers nor new technologies, and will find a way to demote them from their present ‘empowered’ position of entitlement. If they thought having obligations to a husband was such an awful prospect, wait until they have obligations to the husband-substitute state.
Women hate having their earnings stolen by the state even more than men. It’s taking the bread from the mouths of kids. Hence the heavily-female Tea Party.
Getting women to hate men is simply a divide-and-conquer statist con game. Women are wising up.
Great post, btw!
Years ago I worked with a team of salesmen some of whom could sell anything. They never took no for an answer. A few hours with the client and they would have him or her believing that buying would change their lives in the most marvelous ways. Several of these salesmen were single and used the same high pressure techniques to ‘score’on their dates.
I often had to deal with the irate customers who woke up the next day with buyers remorse. I have wondered for years now, how many young men go to prison for just being an unethical salesman? It may be despicable and leave the victim ‘feeling’ they were more abused than if they had been an unwilling rather than a gullible participant, but it is not the same as rape.
Will,
I was an excellent salesman when it came to the other sex. But my technique was a little different.
My favorite “trick” was asking a woman to “sleep naked with me – no sex”. Of course once she takes her clothes off she thinks “I’m going to get laid”. You can see it in her eyes.
Then I sleep with them naked and keep my promise – no sex (well maybe a little fondling).
About 3/4 of the women I tried that on came back gagging for it.
I met my current mate that way. Thirty seven years ago. Four children. She told me something about her attitude. “Is there something wrong with me? Is he gay?” The “I don’t need you” attitude works miracles with females. Plus if she talks you into bed it is hard to then claim “rape”.
[…] is absolutely true. In a comment I left to M. Simon’s post the other day, I explained why: Women hate having their earnings stolen by the state even more than […]