Voter Fraud In The Computer Age

About 25 minutes.

Or a shorter version at 9 minutes running time.

Black Box

And this bit of history:

2016 – Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

It can’t happen here.


Some Changes Coming (maybe)

Breitbart reports:

The Washington Post broke news of Trump’s decision Thursday night, citing five administration sources.

Strong evidence points to George W. Bush’s ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton as a leading candidate to replace McMaster.

What about John Bolton?

During a speech at the 2011 annual National Rifle Association convention, Bolton said that President Barack Obama has “disdain for the American people.” He also said that the President is “using [the drug war] in Mexico, and the use of drugs in our own country, not to combat the illicit narcotic, but to use it as a foundation to argue for stricter gun controls at the federal level.

I take it that he intends to support Trump’s new plan to “combat the illicit narcotic”.


Drug Derangement Syndrome coming from the top

So now Trump is calling for the death penalty as a way of solving the war on drugs.

MOON TOWNSHIP, Pa. – President Donald Trump on Saturday again called for enacting the death penalty for drug dealers during a rally meant to bolster a struggling GOP candidate for a U.S. House seat here.

During the campaign event in this conservative western Pennsylvania district, the president also veered off into a list of other topics, including North Korea, his distaste for the news media and his own election victory 16 months ago.

Trump said that allowing prosecutors to seek the death penalty for drug dealers – an idea he said he got from Chinese President Xi Jinping – is “a discussion we have to start thinking about. I don’t know if this country’s ready for it.”

“Do you think the drug dealers who kill thousands of people during their lifetime, do you think they care who’s on a blue-ribbon committee?” Trump asked. “The only way to solve the drug problem is through toughness. When you catch a drug dealer, you’ve got to put him away for a long time.”

It was not the first time Trump had suggested executing drug dealers. Earlier this month, he described it as a way to fight the opioid epidemic. And on Friday, The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration was considering policy changes to allow prosecutors to seek the death penalty.

But on Saturday his call for executing drug dealers got some of the most enthusiastic cheers of the night. As Trump spoke about policies on the issue in China and Singapore, dozens of people nodded their heads in agreement. “We love Trump,” one man yelled. A woman shouted: “Pass it!”

What can I say that I haven’t said in this blog for over 15 years? The only way to solve the drug problem is through deregulation? That the problem is created and fueled by the laws which criminalize consensual behavior and create vast economic opportunities for criminals? That without drug laws, there would be no criminal drug dealers?

But there I go repeating myself. It’s all a waste of time. There is no possibility of having a rational discussion with clearly irrational people.


On Tariffs

Men with guns (government) can make any steel mill profitable. Trump is a genius.


It Was The Drugs That Did it

Cruz was reportedly taking antidepressants.

Some of the side effects of antidepressants include aggression, agitation, changes in behavior, hallucinations, suicidal thoughts — and homicidal ideation.

Something I wrote in 2004.

It turns out that anxiety disorders are the most common mental health problem in the United States. They are worth $46 billion a year to the pharmaceutical industry. You don’t suppose this fact has any thing to do with the pharmaceutical industries being in the forefront of the Drug Free America campaign do you? Of course not. They are just trying to keep you from being addicted to natural products at the cost of 1/10th of a cent per dose when they are more than willing to sell you an FDA and doctor approved, pharmacy sold product that will do the job for a dollar a dose. They have only your best interests at heart. Just ask their accountants.

It seems like we may need to be talking to their lawyers as well.

So was it the drugs? We don’t know for sure. But we have indications.

Update: 19 February 2018 0424z

Lew Rockwell has a list of mass shootings and the drugs involved.


As sure as sunrise tomorrow, they will blame the guns

While I know it’s getting to be a broken record, I feel the need to repeat a brilliant insight from William S. Burroughs:

After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it.

How true.

And how they must love psychopathic nitwits like Nikolas Cruz.


Happy Valentines Day

Roses Are #FF0000
Violets Are #0000FF
All My Base
Are Belong To You.

Originally from a Front Page comment


Me too busy!


Whatever happened to sexual freedom?

I don’t often agree with Bill Maher, but it seems he’s all but alone in the MSM, and frankly I’m surprised he’s still allowed on the air.

There are a few very brave women whose voices have been drowned out by a gigantic chorus of sexual repression, but almost everyone else is silent in the face of an emerging sexual police state.

Much as I’d love to return to the land of the free and the home of the brave, it seems we’re trapped in the land of the enslaved and the home of the cowards.




Pathogens And Politics

( About 5 1/2 minutes )

Mentioned in the video: PLOS One – Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism


All Miracles Almost All The Time

The miracles happen near the end.

( About 13 1/2 minutes )


Historical Knowledge Or Moral Character

The goal of the Marxists is to destroy the culture from within to put themselves in power. What they forget is that inner weakness invites external attack. Which means some one else will ultimately hold power. Or as the saying goes, “A revolution eats its own.”

( About 3 minutes )


I Have Been Saying That For Over A Decade

I have the video set up to start at roughly the 13 minute mark. You need only watch it for about a minute to get the point.


We Should Starve Them At Their Source

What to do about post-modernism (does post-modernism mean pre-agricultural?).

Here is a link to New Real Peer Review.


Crazy Women

From the video: “There is nothing more dangerous than a weak man”.

And the corollary to that is: “There is nothing more dangerous than a crazy woman.”

We now have a collaboration of the two. It will be fatal.


Jordan Peterson and Camille Paglia also make the point about men keeping civilization (the electricity, the cars, the water supply, the internet, etc.) going.



The purpose of the Legislature is to make criminals. When that exceeds rationality they run short of funds. We have more laws than we have money to enforce.

What a surprise.


That Reminds Me

Angel Albert used to frequent my living room in Bezerkely back in the late 60s. He was waiting for G.G. Witch to get home. She lived a few blocks away.

( About 7 minutes )


The Patriarchy Is Not Going Away

( About 11 minutes )

300 million years of evolution will not be erased by a social campaign.

You want to fix things? You must pay the one thing that most people are very unwilling to pay. Attention.

( About 18 minutes )


Happy New Year!


Merry Christmas!



Cleaning up after asses

Perhaps my logic isn’t as good as it should be, but I’m having a bit of trouble understanding something, so I decided to share it here in the hope of summoning the collective mental processing power of the commenters.

In a local Ann Arbor park which is frequented by dog owners, someone — most likely an angry anti-dog person — created and printed out this scolding reminder directed at irresponsible dog owners:


Whoever “posted” it went to a lot of trouble, for each one was reinforced by black construction paper, and put in a plastic sleeve. There were at least a dozen of them, and each one was rudely fastened to a tree, not by staples, but by ordinary construction nails driven right into the trees! So, I’m guessing that the dogshit hater was no tree lover, and certainly not motivated entirely out of concern for the natural environment. Not only do multiple posters like that ruin the natural beauty of the park, but driving nails into trees is not good for trees:

When hammering a nail into a tree, you penetrate the bark which opens the door to pathogenic fungi which may invade and damage or even kill the tree. If an insect bites a hole in the bark, that is also dangerous, but unless it is a borer, the wound is shallow and can be healed quickly. A fungal infection of a shallow wound may be counteracted by the tree, which forms chemicals to block the growth of the fungus. The actual nail may act as a syringe, inoculating pathogens deep into the tree. If the pathogenic fungus can reach the xylem, the water transporting canals, it may use these as elevator shafts for quickly invading the tree.

When you prune a tree, you cut a living branch. The wound may invite pathogenic fungi, but by making a clean cut with a saw (not a machete) near the base of the branch, you allow the tree to swiftly cover the wound with new tissue. It is important not to damage the main trunk, for example by sawing from the top and then let the branch fall down by its own weight, ripping the bark of the main trunk. An infection of the main trunk due to careless pruning or nails may kill or seriously distort the shape of the tree.

The metals of the actual nail may also affect the tree. When the nail corrodes, dissolved metals may toxify it. A tree in a weakened stage may die from other stress such as drought.

Infections may or may not happen due to the wound. The tree may very well overcome the nail and survive, but when the sign falls down, the secondary growth of the tree trunk will embed the nail inside the tree. If the nail does not corrode, somebody using a chainsaw in the future may hit the nail and have an unpleasant surprise.

Lovely. So the anonymous dogshit hater is doing harm to the environment — ostensibly for the purpose of helping the environment. As to whether the scolding message will have any positive effect, he or she has probably not stopped to consider that the sort of people who don’t pick up after their dogs are inherently irresponsible scofflaw types who give other dog owners (like yours truly) a bad name. Laws already require picking up after one’s dogs in city parks (or anywhere else), and these intractable people are not obeying them. I agree with the sentiment that they are in fact asses.

But since when would an ass heed an anonymous command not to be an ass?

That’s not my only logical problem. My attention was drawn to the silhouette. Donald Trump, no doubt about it. He’s got the no symbol circle around him, which means…. What? Is this a double message, unrelated to dogshit? Trump is bad and should be banned? And by the way pick up after your dog? Or is there some tie-in, as if to say if you don’t pick up after your dog, you are being like Trump? Might they think that because almost everyone in Ann Arbor hates Trump, comparing irresponsible dog owners to him will shame them into submission?

But just how valid is this comparison? There’s no way to make a logical connection between Trump and dogshit or between Trump and irresponsible dog owners, because Trump is not a dog owner, and is said not to like dogs.

William McKinley is the last president to not have a dog, though he had other pets.

But Trump’s legacy, other than the occasional dog-related insult, may exclude the beloved canines, after all.

“Donald was not a dog fan,” Ivana Trump wrote about her former husband in her memoir, Raising Trump. When she brought a poodle named Chappy into their home, Trump fought back. But Ivana’s love of dogs would not be quashed: “It’s me and Chappy or no one!” she told him. And he eventually acquiesced—but never seemed to grow all that fond of that poodle.

The feeling was mutual: When the president went near Ivana’s closet, “Chappy would bark at him territorially,” she wrote.

But for now, “There are no plans” to add a pet to the household, a White House spokesperson told CNN.

Got that? Trump does not like dogs, so for that reason alone it would follow that he doesn’t like dogshit. But in addition, the man is reported to be a germophobe — so much so that he doesn’t even like shaking hands. Simple logic would dictate that a man like that would absolutely loathe dog feces.

Which means that he almost certainly shares the same sentiment as whoever is putting up those posters.

So, in the interest of more complete accuracy, I offer this accurately cleaned up version of the poster.


That will be at least as effective, right?