In honor of my mother who turned 95 earlier this week. She lives in Omaha.
I came across this interesting site. Democrats Against UN Agenda 21.
So what? Most of your towns provided funding and/or infrastructure development for these private projects. They used Redevelopment Agency funds. Your money. Specifically, your property taxes. Notice how there’s very little money in your General Funds now, and most of that is going to pay Police and Fire? Your street lights are off, your parks are shaggy, your roads are pot-holed, your hospitals are closing. The money that should be used for these things is diverted into the Redevelopment Agency. It’s the only agency in government that can float a bond without a vote of the people. And they did that, and now you’re paying off those bonds for the next 45 years with your property taxes. Did you know that? And by the way, even if Redevelopment is ended, as in California, they still have to pay off existing debt–for 30 to 45 years.
So, what does this have to do with Agenda 21?
Redevelopment is a tool used to further the Agenda 21 vision of remaking America’s cities. With redevelopment, cities have the right to take property by eminent domain—against the will of the property owner, and give it or sell it to a private developer. By declaring an area of town ‘blighted’ (and in some cities over 90% of the city area has been declared blighted) the property taxes in that area can be diverted away from the General Fund. This constriction of available funds is impoverishing the cities, forcing them to offer less and less services, and reducing your standard of living.
They have been doing that in Rockford. A 30% or 40% reduction in street lighting. Eminent domain against profitable businesses. And definitely cronies getting the fist shot at the goodies offered. The property gets taken from the unfavored and given to the favored.
So is it Agenda 21 or just the usual corruption? I’m not sure it matters.
Some recent articles on the subject:
A former Mississippi heart surgeon who was jailed for 14 months on drug charges that were eventually dropped said marijuana might provide protection from the deadly Ebola virus, according to gulflive.com. Dr. David Allen, who is now the medical director for Cannabis Sativa Inc., said in a paper written for a medical digest that marijuana should be studied as one answer to the international Ebola crisis.
The paper has been picked up by several marijuana and health news websites and has been shared via social media more than 100,000 times, the story said.
Well we also posted the story. Ebola And Cannabis?
The Medical Minute: 3 Things We Can Learn From Cannabis, Ebola, and Awkward TV Interviews.To which I replied (link added):
Ebola kills by cytokine storm. Look up “cannabis cytokine“.
Cannabis regulates every system in the body studied so far. So the universal miracle claims are not too far fetched. Provided the cannabinoids are matched to the disease. There are agonists and antagonists. There is THC and CBD and a host of others. All cannabis is not the same.
Never say “wood” when you mean mahogany. Or bamboo. Or pine. Same for cannabis.
And something I already covered. Dr. Allen’s original post from October 10th. The one that has gone viral: CBD Protective Against Ebola Virus.
An emerging idea is that flattering words — even saying ”Have a nice evening” — are a form of abuse called “street harassment“:
A 24-year-old aspiring actress has been filmed being catcalled 108 times as she strolled around New York City – even though she was wearing a plain T-shirt, jeans and sneakers.
Shoshana Roberts, a graduate of Kutztown University in Pennsylvania, was captured on a hidden camera by her friend, Rob Bliss, as she walked through the city’s streets.
Over a ten-hour period, she was pelted with dozens of unsolicited comments, including: ‘What’s up beautiful?’, ‘Hey baby’, ‘Smile’ and ‘Have a nice evening darling’.
She was even followed by some men for several minutes, with one repeatedly asking her: ‘You don’t wanna talk? Because I’m ugly?’ Others winked at her, whistled and made inappropriate noises.
The shocking video, filmed in August, was later posted on YouTube and Facebook by Miss Roberts, who describes herself as ‘a New York City-based actress with a black belt’.
Alongside the clip, Miss Roberts wrote: ‘This happens daily to so many people. We don’t put up with harassment in school, at home, or at work, so why should we have to put up with it on the street?’
She added: ‘Everyone has a right to feel safe.’
Really? That’s a fascinating “right.”
What constitutes harassment, anyway?
I don’t like it when strangers ask me for money on the street. I for one would prefer to be complimented on my physical appearance, and although such days are long in the past, I used to enjoy compliments, and even (horror of horrors!) the occasional sexually suggestive remark. I find it less irritating and threatening to be solicited for sex than for money.
But asking people for money is considered constitutionally protected behavior, while what they call “street harassment” is being called a “gateway crime”:
Street harassment is a gateway crime that makes other forms of gender-based violence OK. Studies conducted show that between 80-90% of women have been harassed in public. With legal recourse to address school and workplace harassment, streets remain one of the final frontiers in addressing and affirming basic, guaranteed civil rights.
Comments range from “you’d look good on me,” to groping, public masturbation, and worse. These “compliments” aren’t about sex or about chivalry. They are about power.
In the old days, women would simply haul off and punch a guy who got “fresh.” Now the activists want crude remarks to be criminalized, and the laws changed to enable women to sue railroads, transit authorities, and bus lines when a passenger tells another passenger she is beautiful or to have a nice evening. The list of possible offenses includes “leering” (a.k.a. the “male gaze“).
Where’s my right to feel safe?
It has some people wondering.
He said he could not guess how long it will take to determine the cause of the accident and to make repairs. Culbertson said the company carried insurance on the mission, which he valued at more than $200 million, not counting repair costs.
He stressed that it was too soon to know whether the Russian-built engines, modified for the Antares and extensively tested, were to blame.
“We will understand what happened — hopefully soon — and we’ll get things back on track,” Culbertson assured his devastated team. “We’ve all seen this happen in our business before, and we’ve all seen the teams recover from this, and we will do the same.”
It looks like we are having a bout of corruption supported by big pharma.
VICE has found that many of the researchers who have advocated against legalizing pot have also been on the payroll of leading pharmaceutical firms with products that could be easily replaced by using marijuana. When these individuals have been quoted in the media, their drug-industry ties have not been revealed.
Take, for example, Dr. Herbert Kleber of Columbia University. Kleber has impeccable academic credentials, and has been quoted in the press and in academic publications warning against the use of marijuana, which he stresses may cause wide-ranging addiction and public health issues. But when he’s writing anti-pot opinion pieces for CBS News, or being quoted by NPR and CNBC, what’s left unsaid is that Kleber has served as a paid consultant to leading prescription drug companies, including Purdue Pharma (the maker of OxyContin), Reckitt Benckiser (the producer of a painkiller called Nurofen), and Alkermes (the producer of a powerful new opioid called Zohydro).
Honor dies where interest lies.
The article cited was brought to my attention by Jason Calley.
A top computer scientist discusses what the brain scientists get wrong.
Well, these are metaphors, which can be useful. Flows and pipelines are metaphors that come out of circuits of various kinds. I think in the early 1980s, computer science was dominated by sequential architectures, by the von Neumann paradigm of a stored program that was executed sequentially, and as a consequence, there was a need to try to break out of that. And so people looked for metaphors of the highly parallel brain. And that was a useful thing.
But as the topic evolved, it was not neural realism that led to most of the progress. The algorithm that has proved the most successful for deep learning is based on a technique called back propagation. You have these layers of processing units, and you get an output from the end of the layers, and you propagate a signal backwards through the layers to change all the parameters. It’s pretty clear the brain doesn’t do something like that. This was definitely a step away from neural realism, but it led to significant progress. But people tend to lump that particular success story together with all the other attempts to build brainlike systems that haven’t been nearly as successful.
Except the brain does do back propagation. And the chemicals that do the job of back propagation? Endocannabinoids.
Maybe that explains why he has never heard of them. Endocannabinoids are not common knowledge. A survey of medical schools offering courses in endocannabinoids got responses like these:
• Are you aware what type of institution we are? Why would we offer that here?
• The topic hasn’t gained enough traction or notoriety on this campus to be fully explored… Y’know what I mean?
• I have no idea what that is.
• You will have some very brief exposure to cannabinoid receptors and their effects in our curriculum.
• No course would touch upon this subject longer than five minutes.
• There are 12 mentions of cannabinoids in the curriculum database but no mention of the endocannabinoid system.
• We don’t teach anything like that at this school
• If it is mentioned, it is not a particular focus or talking point. I haven’t heard the endocannabinoid system come up in conversation.
• This is a school for people who want to become “doctors.”
• I never heard of it. We probably don’t teach it.
• Why are you asking that question? I don’t believe that’s an appropriate question. I wouldn’t waste other faculty member’s time with that question.
Lets see. You have more cannabinoid receptors in your body than any other type and it is not taught in medical school? Houston (and New York, and Chicago, and Berkeley, and Dallas, and…), we have a problem.
But you can help. Teach a doctor about endocannabinoids.
I took two of my recent favorite topics and combined them for a ‘net search. Just to see what came up. And what came up was interesting. To say the least.
First off, in business news.
Ebola.com was sold to a marijuana-related company based in Russia that paid mostly in the stock of another marijuana company.
But the story’s not over yet. As recently as September of this year, Weed Growth Fund was known as Ovation Research, which according to this BusinessWeek profile was in the business of distributing “stainless steel cookware products for retail and wholesale customers in North America.”
Then, on Sept. 19, the company filed with the Nevada Secretary of State changing its name to Weed Growth Fund. (We tried to contact Weed Growth Fund by phone and email to ask about the deal and name change, but got no answer.)
Why would a marijuana company want to own the URL Ebola.com? Elliot Silver, DomainInvesting.com’s publisher, asked Blue String Ventures founder Jon Schultz this very question. And while Schultz replied that he did not know why Weed Growth Fund wanted the domain, he did send Silver to this Marijuana.com article in which Cannabis Sativa CEO Gary Johnson (the former two-term New Mexico governor and Libertarian Party presidential candidate!) claims that marijuana can be used to treat Ebola. (You can see him do it in this Fox Business interview.)
Here is the interview. I think Gary makes a point. What harm is there in trying to help with cannabis? Who knows? It might help. (We’ll get to that in a bit.)
Can Cannabinoids in Cannabis Paste fight off Ebola? Interesting question.
Brad Morehouse, founder of NewCure.org believes that it will greatly decrease the mortality rate and, quite possibly, be beneficial in clinical use.
“Enough research has already been done, and current evidence of cannabinoids killing other diseases, such as Lyme disease, is overwhelming,” says Morehouse. “Cannabis is currently being researched as a natural substance to fight HIV and build up the body’s immune system, since it’s one of nature’s best antiretrovirals.” U.S. federal and state laws, as well as research restrictions on drug companies, severely hamper the advancement and investigation of the healing properties of Cannabis. The worldwide research conducted so far indicates that Cannabis has significant medical potential and myriad therapeutic uses. Researchers in the natural-cures arena, however, are at a further disadvantage–they cannot work with the Ebola strain as the mandatory Level 4 Bio-Safety lab is way beyond the reach of such research. Regardless, Morehouse believes the time has come to tap into the anti-inflammatory properties of Cannabis (which is now being utilized in a cutting-edge paste form) and its benefits to the immune system.
Studies conclude that Ebola kills by cytokine storm, a potentially fatal immune system reaction. Besides Cannabis having antiretrovirals, cannabinoids are anti-inflammatory, which decreases the severity of cytokine storm. The study of cannabinoids has led to many important discoveries in immunology–not only the existence of a new physiological system (the endocannabinoid system), but also its role in the regulation of the immune system. Studies examining the effect of cannabinoids on immunity have shown that many cellular and cytokine mechanisms are suppressed by these agents. Klein&Cabral, 2006
The people at the link are selling Cannabis Paste. So they might be biased. OTOH they may be on to something if the research they point to is valid.
Here is some one I trust Dr. David B. Allen on the question.
There is good scientific evidence that cannabinoids, and in particular Cannabidiol (CBD), may offer control of the immune system and in turn provide protection from viral infections (4). Cannabis has already been recognized to inhibit fungus and bacteria and can be considered a new class of antimicrobial because of the different mechanism of action from other antimicrobials. (1)
Ebola is a complex RNA viral organism that causes the cell to engulf it by pinocytosis, and then the virus hijacks the cell to replicate itself. This replication can involve many mutations in the RNA code that make it difficult to impossible to create an effective vaccine. There are U.S. Patents showing evidence that Cannabinoids have significant anti-viral activity. (3) (4)
Normally any virus infected cells will produce surface proteins that are identified as foreign. The Immune system attacks these cells when the surface protein is identified as foreign. The Ebola virus infection causes the cell to produce proteins that hide the virus from the immune system. The viral proteins are sterically shielded, i.e. “hidden” from view, thereby hindering cellular (and thus viral) destruction by the immune system. This mechanism allows the RNA virus to hide the infected cell by shielding it from view from the immune system.
The cause of death by this virus is the body’s own immune response to the viral infection. This is what causes the mortality and morbidity of this infection. Subsequently, the virus triggers the immune killer cells to release the enzymes (cytokines) they hold. This release of enzymes causes other lymphocyte to release even more Cytokines in a Storm of release. This is properly termed a Cytokine Storm.
Causes small blood clots to form in all arterioles, called; DIC or Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Causes a massive Coagulopathy where the blood will not to clot properly simultaneously with the DIC (Bleeding and clotting occur at the same time.) Toxic Shock Syndrome occurs when the cytokines release causes the blood vessels to dilate to such an extent that a shock state exists.
Cannabinoids are proven to reduce and prevent Toxic Shock and DIC (2)
There is much more at the link. Dr. Allen knows cannabis and endocannabinoids so he may be on to something.
The video explains simply what Dr. Allen ran down in more medical terms.
The video was done by THC University.org
Eric brought to my attention that although it is generally true that Prohibitionists reside on the conservative right it is not strictly true. In Louisiana Democrat Senator Mary Landrieu opposes medical cannabis while her main opponent Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La favors medical cannabis.
There’s no reason Landrieu shouldn’t be for legalizing marijuana in such situations. There’s no reason anymore anyone should oppose it.
Landrieu’s not the only slow liberal Democrat on this one. National Review was for it 18 years before The New York Times finally backed it earlier this year.
Also for it: Landrieu’s main challenger, Rep. Bill Cassidy, R-La.
The best thing to do would be to make marijuana legal, period, then sell it and tax it as we do tobacco and liquor. Barring that reasonable move, however, the next best thing is allowing people suffering through chemotherapy or other draining regimens to smoke some pot.
Nevertheless, there was Landrieu on the stage in Shreveport last week, staring down a rising Cassidy and about to see a poll the next morning that had her trailing him by 9. The first lightning round requested a “yes” or “no” on medical marijuana.
Cassidy, who fielded the question first, had already said “yes.” His affirmative response seemed to take one of the very nice liberal moderators aback for she asked him to repeat his answer, and the candidate (who is also a medical doctor) said “yes” again.
Next up was retired Air Force Col. Rob Maness and out shot an immediate “no.” I’d like to see Maness change his mind on that issue, but he’s a military officer and those guys have a way of being hidebound on issues like allowing someone withering away because they have no appetite from firing up a bong hit or two and getting the munchies.
Finally the question came to Landrieu. And she said “no.”
According to Real Clear Politics Cassidy is likely to be the final winner of the race if no one gets a majority in November.
In other news, Eric has kept me up on a challenge to the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) in Federal Court in the Eastern District of California.
The U.S. government claims marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug with no medical benefits. But that claim will be up for debate Monday in California when a federal judge is scheduled to hear testimony from doctors that conclude the opposite.
Doctors Carl Hart, Associate Professor of Psychology at Columbia University, retired physician Phillip Denny, and Greg Carter, Medical Director of St. Luke’s Rehabilitation Institute in Spokane, Washington will testify Monday that marijuana — real name, “cannabis” — is not the demon drug the federal government makes it out to be. Accepted science does not justify the listing of cannabis as a dangerous “Schedule I” substance, many say.
There is more on this all over the ‘net. Have a look around. And if you are wondering why the case is sometimes referred to as “Schweder” and sometimes a “Pickard” you can follow the motions made in the case and the rulings of the judge at eastern_district_of_calif/schweder-marijuana-case/. And just to relieve the suspense: it is a multiple defendant case and Schweder and Pickard (is that you Jean Luc?) are two of the defendants.
What is happening is that Prohibition is breaking down. The state of the law is going to be messy for a while.
Let us say that by transmission methods encouraged by the left Ebola doubles every 21 days. In 31 doublings there will be 4 billion dead. Lets do the math 31 *21 = 651 days. A little less than two years.
The above post is a bit over simplified as it ignores changes in the population. At some point the infection rate will slow down as logistic curve effects begin to suppress exponential growth. You obviously cannot have more infected than exist in the local population pool and as the death rate grows the number of immune survivors also increases and at some point then will become a large enough portion of the population that the fertile ground for growth in a virgin population will also start to slow the spread as fewer and fewer members of the population are susceptible to the infection. Also social behavior will change when it really gets out of control just as it did during the plagues. Towns will cut themselves off from infected areas, high risk behaviors such as social kisses will disappear.Visits to prostitutes will drop off as people realize such contacts put them at very high risk.
That said the above growth numbers will be valid in the early expansion of the disease through virgin populations at the point where the infection is like a grass fire burning across an open prairie.
Well for now the stupids – although retreating some – still have the upper hand. It will not last. Imminent death has a way of focusing the mind.
A screed by ChiefIO on Ebola:
So we’ve already dodged the bullet once (maybe – we still have about 3 weeks to know) in Dallas. So what happens? ANOTHER brilliantly clueless idiot who is enamored of his own specialness and noble cause manages to put all of NYC (and through it all of the globe) at risk of a disease that has a 70% mortality and no proven treatment.
Yes, there are a few speculative treatments. I hardly find it comforting to think of a few speculative treatments as how to ‘bet the future of humanity’ in a prudent way.
Given enough trials, one of these times the ‘bug’ will escape to the general public. Some returning guy will spend the night with a hooker who has a dozen clients in the next dozen days (who did not give their names) and it’s “off to the races”. During flu season, those dozen will not be diagnosed as Ebola until AFTER they have infected another 2 or 3 each. At that point, in a dense urban place like NYC, this ends when 100% are dead, recovered, or naturally immune. The present mortality rate has at least 1/2 and up to 70% of NYC dead. Maybe not this time, but soon enough….
And in another bit of world class stupidity:
Well no. They are entirely rational.
Update: 25 October 2014 0341z
Rationality is starting to prevail.
NEW YORK (AP) — Alarmed by the case of an Ebola-infected New York doctor, the governors of New Jersey and New York on Friday ordered a mandatory, 21-day quarantine for all medical workers and other arriving travelers who have had contact with victims of the deadly disease in West Africa.
I last visited this subject in March of 2013. In light of my many posts on how cannabis can cure cancer at least in some people and given this is breast cancer awareness month, and in recognition of the GOP effort to continue drug prohibition I thought the subject could use a revisit.
A definition is in order and the wiki is probably good enough in this instance.
Crimes Against Humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum, “are particularly odious offences in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of human beings.” They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; massacres; dehumanization; extermination; human experimentation; extrajudicial punishments; military use of children; kidnappings; unjust imprisonment; slavery; cannibalism, torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution; and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
So would widespread persecution of people for what they like to smoke be considered a crime against humanity? How about denying the ill medicine in order to continue the persecution? Well that probably qualifies.
And where do the majority of these Nazis reside in the current era? As Bill Quick has pointed out and the Heritage Foundation has so amply proved, they reside for the most part in the Republican Party. And they do not appear to be ashamed of their position.
Help them out. Make Drug War Nazi a common phrase. And when asked, point out that they would deny some people medicine in order to continue the persecution of other people.
Among other things, they can steal your house:
A Norcross, Georgia, woman is pleading with city leaders not to take her home over an overdue tax bill of $94.85.
The woman says she never received any notices and never knew her condo had been sold at auction. Now city officials are trying to figure out what, if anything, went wrong.
Xui Lui says she never knew there was an overdue tax bill on her place because the notices were returned to city hall.
Lui bought the two-bedroom Norcross condo with cash in 2011. She lives there with her 4-year-old child. Records show she’s paid the county taxes and the city tax every year except that first year, when the certified letters warning of the outstanding balance were returned to the city because of clerical errors. That error turned out to be an incomplete address.
So she lost her house over a pittance, based on a bill she never received.
The city says they are “doing” their “due diligence”:
Norcross City Manager Rudolph Smith told WSB-TV on Monday, “We are going back and doing our due diligence. (The city contractor who handled the sale) will try to work something out.”
However, since the property has already been legally sold to another buyer, it’s unclear what can be done.
“Legally sold.” What a disgustingly loaded term that is. The state can take your property by right without even informing you?
Makes me wonder how many others have been screwed out of their property by governments.
Eric covered the nomination of Vanita Gupta, as acting head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, runnning down the Drug War aspects of her nomination. Surprisingly, a pro drug site, The Weed Blog, covered some other aspects.
The Washington Post reports that Obama intends to nominate Vanita Gupta, the American Civil Liberties Union’s Deputy Legal Director, to lead the Justice Department’s civil rights division. This news comes not long after Attorney General Eric Holder announced his imminent resignation, and indicates a continued initiative of positive federal drug policy changes.
Gupta has been outspoken on a number of issues, including racial sentencing disparities, federal incentives to state police that prioritize the investigation of drug arrests over violent crime, mandatory minimum sentences and related disparities, as well as marijuana legalization. She currently leads the ACLU’s Campaign to End Mass Incarceration. Gupta has also garnered bipartisan support with conservatives Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform and David Keene, former president of the NRA, both speaking highly of her.
“Vanita Gupta has witnessed the damage caused by our erroneous policies throughout her career. She’s a brilliant choice for this position,” says executive director of LEAP, Major Neill Franklin (ret.). “This shows that the federal government is aiming to look at drug policy issues through a social-justice lens rather than a criminal justice one. ”
Americans for Tax Reform? The NRA? Well other than the Drug War she does not seem to be a bete noire of the right.
So lets have a look at WaPo.
“In that zone, she’s been good to work with and a serious person,” Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, said in an interview. “She’s been open to working with conservatives on good policy. She has played a strong role in the left-right cooperation in criminal justice issues.”
David Keene, who was president of the National Rifle Association from 2011 to 2013, also praised Gupta’s “collaborative approach.”
“Vanita is a very good person,” he said in an interview. “I’ve worked with her on criminal justice reform issues. Most of the Obama administration people have been so ideologically driven that they won’t talk to people who disagree with them. Vanita is someone who works with everyone. She both listens to and works with people from all perspectives to accomplish real good.”
What our friends on the right fail to grasp is that except in certain small sections of the country the Drug War does not garner huge support. Last I looked the % of the population favoring an end to Cannabis Prohibition was 58% and rising. At what level of support for ending Prohibition does the Heritage Foundation give it up? If Segregation is any guide there will be die hards remaining for quite some time.
Well the Right wants to remain stupid on the issue. It will eventually cost them. Unless they can find a way to support Rand Paul.
The link goes to this Heritage Foundation pro-Drug War screed opposing the nomination of Vanita Gupta for daring to have opined that drug possession be decriminalized.
While the Drudge link might give the impression that the attack on Gupta is a “news” article, that is hardly the case. The hit piece was written by a Drug War booster who links his “research” which makes the claim that marijuana is
“an addictive, gateway drug. It significantly impairs bodily and mental functions, and its use is related to increased violence.”
What are the Drudge/Heritage think tankists thinking?
That pushing the Drug War a good campaign issue for the GOP?
Whatever they’re smoking, I don’t think it’s the right stuff.
This is Breast Cancer Awareness Month. And it is a Big Deal. So big our local paper made its front page pink. Evidently no one is aware that cannabis can cure some (maybe all) breast cancer. From the US Government. Copious links omitted here are available at the link.
One study in mice and rats suggested that cannabinoids may have a protective effect against the development of certain types of tumors. During this 2-year study, groups of mice and rats were given various doses of THC by gavage. A dose-related decrease in the incidence of hepatic adenoma tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was observed in the mice. Decreased incidences of benign tumors (polyps and adenomas) in other organs (mammary gland, uterus, pituitary, testis, and pancreas) were also noted in the rats. In another study, delta-9-THC, delta-8-THC, and cannabinol were found to inhibit the growth of Lewis lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo . In addition, other tumors have been shown to be sensitive to cannabinoid-induced growth inhibition.[5-8]
Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis invasion and metastasis.[9-12] Two reviews summarize the molecular mechanisms of action of cannabinoids as antitumor agents.[13,14] Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor.
The effects of delta-9-THC and a synthetic agonist of the CB2 receptor were investigated in HCC. Both agents reduced the viability of HCC cells in vitro and demonstrated antitumor effects in HCC subcutaneous xenografts in nude mice. The investigations documented that the anti-HCC effects are mediated by way of the CB2 receptor. Similar to findings in glioma cells, the cannabinoids were shown to trigger cell death through stimulation of an endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway that activates autophagy and promotes apoptosis.
I sent the above excerpt to my local paper along with:
There is much more. And yet your paper like so many others in the country continues to ignore the subject. Prejudice kills. And then there is cannabis and Alzheimer’s. Cannabis and diabetes. Cannabis and so many diseases. Because we have more endocannabinoid receptors in the body than any other receptor type.
When this becomes general knowledge it will be an indictment of our whole “news” dissemination system. And you will deserve it.
In other news: Asking If ‘Big Gov’t Sucks’ Got This Girl Kicked Off Campus. Because you only have free speech rights in free speech zones. The rest of the country is zoned unfree.
And a real surprise here: A Heart Warming Police Story. Sort of. At least no one was shot. And no puppies were involved. Probably fortunately.
And of course the perennially popular …rich people versus French and German banks, Goldman Sachs, and the Chinese Communist pals of Henry Paulson.
Extremely low levels of the compound in marijuana known as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, may slow or halt the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, a recent study from neuroscientists at the University of South Florida shows.
Findings from the experiments, using a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease, were reported online in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Researchers from the USF Health Byrd Alzheimer’s Institute showed that extremely low doses of THC reduce the production of amyloid beta, found in a soluble form in most aging brains, and prevent abnormal accumulation of this protein — a process considered one of the pathological hallmarks evident early in the memory-robbing disease. These low concentrations of THC also selectively enhanced mitochondrial function, which is needed to help supply energy, transmit signals, and maintain a healthy brain.
THC? Isn’t that the stuff that gets you high? How can hat be good for you? Anyway my guess is that that kind of prejudice goes a long way.
Update: Well that post I linked on cannabis was from August of this year. How about Time Magazine – October 2012? In the very first paragraph:
…a new review suggests that drugs similar to marijuana’s active ingredients may hold promise for preventing— or even reversing— brain aging and possibly Alzheimer‘s and other degenerative brain diseases.
It is not like the information is new or hidden. It just doesn’t register.
This is an outrage:
The case against a 20-year-old UC Berkeley student charged earlier this month with rape has been dismissed, authorities said Friday afternoon, and he has been found “factually innocent” of that allegation.
Eugene Quillin was scheduled to enter a plea in the case Friday morning.
But Teresa Drenick, Alameda County district attorney’s office spokeswoman, said Friday afternoon that the case against Quillin was instead dismissed.
Quillin’s attorney, Ted W. Cassman, said shortly before 4 p.m. via email that the case was dismissed for insufficient evidence, and that the judge ruled Quillin to be factually innocent.
For over a week now, I have been reading about this case on an almost daily basis. The kid was arrested, held with a huge bail, excoriated in the press, etc.
And now? Will there be any apologies?
Does it matter that his life has been nearly ruined?
A friend said he didn’t understand why there aren’t more consequences for these accusers, and I think this comment explains why:
There seems to be a very reactionary, radical feminist movement on college campuses across America. It is clearly big enough to influence government and policy decisions. Unfortunately this movement seeks to subvert one of the basic tenets of the American criminal justice system: the rights of the accused. As a result, this young man’s future at Cal is over. Hopefully he is able to recoup his losses through some sort of lawsuit, and start fresh at another school.
When hysteria prevails, the rights of the accused mean nothing.