|
November 21, 2010
Birther Madness
Some Birther Madness from Ulsterman's Deep Throat. The she in question is supposed to be Nancy Pelosi. We shall she. Insider: Well, she was at it again and then she says something along the lines of, "How about I just hand over the goddamn certification file. They want me to go there? Because that's where they're pushing me."This could be the smoking gun. Or just the smoking bong. Only time will tell. And then the insider goes on to what he considers the real deal. The Insider thought that Nancy Pelosi would retire so she can covertly release information that will make the investigation easier. But she didn't retire. She got elected minority leader. Insider thought that if that happened the fix was in. Well there is way more on the Ulsterman site. It will be interesting to see who double crosses whom first. The Insider's final thoughts should Pelosi be elected Minority Leader? Duck and cover kid. Duck and -expletive- cover... Well she was elected. We live in interesting times. Way too interesting. Update: The very latest on the birther question. Well latest to me. Sept. 26 this year. It discusses the certification file. It also makes some unwarranted assumptions (they so want this to be true). So be careful out there. I did find it helpful when it comes to keeping up with the latest birther angle. Who knows? There may be something to this one. I have some confirmation of the birther question link information here. Purported copies of the two different types of certification. Curiouser and curiouser. I just had an odd thought. What if the above is Hillary's words being put in Pelosi's mouth and Deep Throat is Carville? This stuff will drive you nuts. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 11.21.10 at 07:36 AM
Comments
Yep. I looked at the article you link to in the update, but as soon as I saw this passage: "The Constitution also specifically states that dual citizens are expressly excluded from running for office of the presidency" I knew that there couldn't possibly be anything worth reading in the rest of it. That passage is a blatant lie, and I cannot fathom how any intelligent and honest person can pay attention to anything else the author has to say. Why would you link to such an article, except to ridicule it? Milhouse · November 21, 2010 01:34 PM Milhouse, This stuff will drive you nuts. M. Simon · November 21, 2010 06:23 PM Why link? Well the birther stuff interests me. I link to what interests me. You are not required to read it. ====== There are some who wish that this President could be made to go away with the wave of a wand. This birther stuff is evidence of their longing. ====== My theory is that we got into this mess because the Republican Party became the social issues party. "As long as you are right on social issues - spending doesn't much matter." M. Simon · November 21, 2010 06:30 PM Yeah - what Eric said. And what Milhouse said. However, IF our president were legally (by Hawaiian law) adopted by his Indonesian (Soerto) father, and IF his mother requested Indonesian citizenship. Then, there might be a problem. Indonesia does NOT allow dual citizenship. If he's legally adopted by the laws of his state that could also explain why he has no long-form certificate. Adoptees are legally nonpersons in most states - they are not permitted to see their original birth certificates. Kathy K · November 21, 2010 06:43 PM Milhouse, Kathy, Uh. The post is titled Birther Maddness. I thought it interesting that Republicans certify one way for all states and the Ds do it differently depending on the state. Seems curios. It also is a "fact" that no one so far (sceptic or believer) denies. As I pointed out in the article: I don't think you can jump from that fact to "he is ineligible". My exact words: It also makes some unwarranted assumptions (they so want this to be true). So be careful out there. I'm sorry - I had no idea of the amount of emotion invested in this topic by the sceptics. Will I be more careful in the future? Maybe. Maybe not. M. Simon · November 21, 2010 07:57 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2010
October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
I saw you face thieves coming! So hands off my f-ing face!
How long will I be allowed the safety of my own car? Out In Force My Imagination Is Getting Better A Mopping Up Operation A "right" that puts an end to rights I Have Another One A Grinding Mill No sardines and no quarter? Rolling Back Socialism In America
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The linked piece says this:
Based upon the Constitutional provision stated in Article 2 Section 1 which proclaimed that no candidate could run for the office of president unless they were a natural born citizen, obviously the requirement had not been met. The Constitution also specifically states that dual citizens are expressly excluded from running for office of the presidency.
There is no constitutional provision anywhere requiring certification, nor does the Constitution "specifically state that dual citizens are expressly excluded from running for office of the presidency."
While Obama may or may not have been properly certified by the DNC, that is not an issue of constitutional dimension. The argument that a dual citizen by birth is not a natural born citizen is the legal opinion of those who promote it, based on their interpretation of "natural born." (An argument which I think would be summarily rejected even assuming it ever came before the Supreme Court.)
Here's what Art 2, Sec 1 says:
***QUOTE***
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
***END QUOTE***