|
October 11, 2010
Wedge Issues
I have been meaning to write a post about wedge issues (with the usual delays and procrastinations) when commenter Fritz obliquely brought up the issue. So I went a lookin and found this. So - procrastination over. Carl Paladino, Tea Party darling and New York Republican gubernatorial candidate, went on a shocking anti-gay rant, telling a group of Orthodox Jewish leaders that homosexuality is unacceptable.I believe the days of wedge issue politics are numbered. Why? Well there is a tale in that. To start it is always wise to know what you are talking about. A wedge issue is a social or political issue, often of a divisive or otherwise controversial nature, which splits apart or creates a "wedge" in the support base of one political group. Wedge issues can be advertised, publicly aired, and otherwise emphasized by an opposing political group, in an attempt to weaken the unity of the divided group, or to entice voters in the divided group to give their support to the opposing group. The use of wedge issues gives rise to wedge politics.Of course this kind of thing could backfire. In fact it often does. As it did in Illinois in 2004 Currently Wisconsin is also embroiled in a culture war. The economy has dominated the debate in the race for governor, but groups opposing abortion and supporting reproductive rights say the stark differences between the candidates mean results of the Nov. 2 election will have repercussions for years to come.OK. Republicans are doing again. I knew it couldn't last. Despite these examples (and how the two races turn out and the exit polling afterward) I think this tactic will get deep sixed. Why? Well to figure out that question we have to look at why wedge issues are used. That is not to hard - it is used because there is not a dimes worth of difference between the major parties on general issues - you know - one party wants socialism hell bent for leather. The other party is not quite in such a rush. Some choice. So you need wedge issues to crank up your base and maybe gather a few votes from the other side. The down side is that you get a culture war. Straights vs gays. Dopers vs alkys. Pro abortionists vs those who prefer a black market in abortion. And on it goes. And you know this kind of thing works. In some places at some times. And when it does the outcome is always ugly. How do I know? Because it has worked before in Germany against the Jews. In fact it seems to be happening in this country against gays. Just suicides so far. I'm not encouraged. Still. I don't think Americans will stand for this. It is not in our nature generally. Most of the time. People who push this crap are playing with fire. Why? Because there are some of us who would rather vote bankruptcy than culture war. And with all the economic issues on the table a "Culture War" is unnecessary unless you have nothing generally different to offer. I don't care who the TEA Party darlings are, if they are culture warriors I will work against them with all my power. So - Thanks Fritz! Because I will be God Damned if any of these bastard sons of bitches are coming after any one, because Jews will always be on that list sooner or later. Which is why I take this sort of thing personally. And why Republicans have such a hard time attracting Jews. You stupid fucks. OK. Deep breath. Anyway I think this will end in time because unity on financial issues is the most pressing issue now and we will not have a culture to fight over unless we get our economic house in order. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 10.11.10 at 09:43 AM
Comments
Eric, This is true, but the paradox is that people who want to be left alone also want to leave other people alone. This provides a political vacuum into which activist busybodies step and begin to interfere with those who just want to be left alone. Never trust any activist who agitates for a "cause," regardless of how "just" the cause might appear. T · October 11, 2010 11:23 AM At a lunch get-together last Wednesday, about 15 gay friends and I got around to discussing politics and the California governor's race. "y Jack Chang SAN DIEGO – Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman said Friday that she would defend voter-approved Proposition 8, which prohibits same-sex marriage, if she becomes governor next year." This was an unforced error on her part. The job of enforcing state laws is up to the Attorney General, not the Governor. But to appease the religious right, and that includes a majority of registered Republicans, she had no choice. So, I have the choice as usual of voting economic vs. social issues. This time I'll hold my nose and vote economics. The rest of my friends won't. So just how many people do Republicans turn off by the wedge issues? At a time when gay teenagers are killing themselves, you'd think the assholes Republicans would enough sense to keep their fucking mouths shut. Frank · October 11, 2010 02:46 PM Frank, The California Republican Party has been a millstone around fiscal conservatives since forever. They keep losing elections and can't seem to figure out why. Here is a Democrat who talks about what is wrong with both parties in CA and also lands a solid blow on voters. http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2010/10/we_dont_do_numb.html M. Simon · October 11, 2010 04:34 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Krugman Vs Reality
Housing Is Not The Only Sector Underwater He's Not Here To boost sluggish Amazon rankings, give your book a lift! The scolded squishy independents will soon have their turn Wedge Issues Who Has The Title? 1010101010 "There is a major change occurring within conservative thought." "deep down I know exactly -- and anonymously -- how you feel"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Didn't see your post before I wrote mine.
What some candidates forget is that it's a mistake to see this issue simply in terms of the number of gays (who are few in number), because the issue resonates with people who are not in the least gay, but who want to be left alone, and see it as a freedom thing.
It's a wedge issue that does not necessarily work as planned, and it can have repercussions beyond the ostensible race involved.