Have a heart! (Preferably with with some fava beans and a nice Chianti….)

The other night it occurred to me that the following headlines were related:

This one:

IRS auditor reaffirms that conservatives, not liberals, were targeted

And this one

26% of Obama Supporters View Tea Party as Nation’s Top Terror Threat

Had to read that again. Here’s the explanation:

…among those who approve of the president’s job performance, just 29% see radical Muslims as the bigger threat. Twenty-six percent (26%) say it’s the Tea Party that concerns them most. Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the Tea Party than radical Muslims.

As for those who disapprove of Obama’s performance, 75% consider radical Muslims to be the bigger terrorist threat. Just one percent (1%) name the Tea Party.

That kind of polarization is not the sort of thing I have ever seen among Americans before, and I have lived in this country for nearly 60 years.

So I read on.

Sixty-seven percent (67%) of voters think it is at least somewhat likely that terrorist groups will soon gain access to nuclear weapons, including 34% who feel it is Very Likely.

Huh?

Does that mean the Tea Party is poised to acquire nuclear weapons?

Who knew?

Here’s how the survey questions were worded:

4*Which is a bigger terrorist threat to the United States today – radical Muslims, the Tea Party, local militia groups, the Occupy Wall Street movement, or other religious or political extremists?

5* How likely is it that terrorist groups will soon gain access to nuclear weapons?

I would like to think that the 26% of Obama supporters who think this way are hysterical and simply projecting their emotional rage. Surely, they cannot really think the Tea Party is the biggest terrorist threat to the United States today.

Or can they?

I honestly don’t know. What I do know is that this country is ceasing to be the country I grew up in, and which I sometimes delude myself into thinking still exists so I can get to sleep at night.

While I was mulling this over,  a friend emailed me a link which left me speechless.

A Texas teenager who has been in jail since March faces an eight-year prison sentence because of a threatening joke he made while playing an online video game.

In February, Justin Carter was playing “League of Legends” — an online, multiplayer fantasy game — when another player wrote a comment calling him insane. Carter’s response, which he now deeply regrets, was intended as joke.

“He replied ‘Oh yeah, I’m real messed up in the head, I’m going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts,’ and the next two lines were lol and jk,” said Jack Carter, Justin’s father, in a statement to a local news channel.

The statements “lol” and “jk” — meaning “laughing out loud” and “just kidding” — indicate that Justin’s statement was entirely sarcastic, said his father.

But a Canadian woman who saw the post looked up Carter’s Austin address, determined that it was near an elementary school, and called the police. Carter was arrested one month later, and has been in jail ever since. He recently celebrated his 19th birthday behind bars.

Authorities charged him with making a terrorist threat. If convicted, he will face eight years in prison.

“These people are serious. They really want my son to go away to jail for a sarcastic comment that he made,” said the elder Carter.

Got that?

Sarcasm = terrorism.

And we wonder why the IRS was going after what 26% of Obama supporters (including Joe Biden) consider the biggest terrorist threat to the United States today?

Seriously, I cannot believe this stuff is happening in the United States of America.

And I wouldn’t believe it if I didn’t see it on a daily basis. At least the latest story has gotten around. I wonder how many more there are that haven’t.

Words fail me. I am beyond disgust. Sure, I can write another stupid post, but nothing I say or think means a damned thing. I’m glad I took up metal work. Inanimate objects are more sane than humans.

I mean, really. What am I supposed to say here?

Should I defend our First Amendment right to be sarcastic?

Should I defend the right to voice opinions that are tacky or otherwise not in good taste as I did very recently?

Should I point out that phrases like “OFF THE PIGS,” and “EAT THE RICH” have advocated murder and cannibalism for decades?

Or…. should I point out that the sarcastic advocacy of cannibalism is at least as old as Jonathan Swift? And the actual eating of children in advanced civilizations is even older?

Why bother?

If the Constitution of the United States makes no difference, why should my “terrorist” opinions?


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

7 responses to “Have a heart! (Preferably with with some fava beans and a nice Chianti….)”

  1. Neil Avatar
    Neil

    I’d say that 26% is engaging in pre-emptive justification. For what they intend to do to the Tea Party demographic in the near future, that is.

  2. Frank Avatar
    Frank

    Inanimate objects are more sane than humans.
    Daily life has almost become science fiction?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIYrGYGgVxA

  3. Simon Avatar

    Inanimate objects are more sane than humans.

    And that explains my recent focus on electrons.

    ECN Magazine – MSimon’s blog

  4. Neil Avatar
    Neil

    Another example of the insanity:
    Bottled-water purchase leads to night in jail for U.Va. student

    “The woman was on edge after spending the night listening to stories from dozens of sexual assault survivors at an annual “Take Back the Night” vigil on Grounds, said Daly’s defense attorney, Francis Lawrence.”

    http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/state-regional/bottled-water-purchase-leads-to-night-in-jail-for-u/article_45498018-e019-11e2-b98a-001a4bcf6878.html

  5. Eric Scheie Avatar

    Yeah that’s right! Throw the book at a 20 year old girl for buying water (she faces 5 years) while dangerous felons are free to commit home invasions and mayhem, like the guy caught on the nanny cam:

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/29/arrest-made-in-nyc-suspect-in-nj-home-invasion-caught-on-nanny-cam/

    ***QUOTE***

    Custis, whose last known address was on Irvine Turner Boulevard in Newark, has 12 felony convictions dating back to the early 1990s. He was most recently jailed in connection with a string of burglaries across New Jersey in March 2011 and served 10 months at the Southern State Correctional Facility in Cumberland County, according to court records. He was released in December.

    In July 2006, Custis escaped from a state Department of Corrections halfway house and was later arrested for burglarizing more than 20 homes in Hamilton and Trenton, according to court documents.

    ***END QUOTE***

    It would not surprise me if the victim owned no guns, believed the police would protect her, and (last but not least) voted Democrat.

    After all, the Republicans hate homos!

  6. Gringo Avatar
    Gringo

    Hollywood can make movies full of violence and make billions of them on an annual basis [estimate], yet a teenager can make a violent statement clearly made as a joke- LOL & JK- and gets jailed.

  7. Neil Avatar
    Neil

    Eric, I’m not sure either party covered themselves with glory on that one. What struck me was the similarity of the two mindsets that put both groups of people on a collision course.

    Note that the arrested woman was jumpy because she’d just been to a “Take Back the Night” event. Having been to a few, I can say that’s a nasty little party at which the organizers try to convince young women that every man they meet wants to rape them. Many moons ago, I foolishly believed I was a feminist, and it was that exposure which convince me otherwise. She was primed for a flight or flight reaction.

    The cops, on the other hand, had no business assaulting someone for buying what they believed to be beer. You see, they’ve been to too many very similar parties at which they convince themselves a la Javert that “civilians” (not “citizens”) are all reprobates who are liable to turn violent towards a cop at any moment, so any interaction with said civilians must be commenced with the maximum allowable use of force.

    So, each of those groups saw what they wanted to see, and they both got what they wanted to get. And it was all over bottled water.