A Man Of the People

Donald Trump favors letting government take your money without due process.

Two Texas senators have offered legislation this year to require conviction before someone’s assets could be seized. Sen. Konni Burton, a Republican who often pushes civil-liberties legislation to protect personal information and property, was a fierce critic of Trump during the campaign. She and Sen. Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa, a McAllen Democrat, have formed an unlikely team pushing this asset forfeiture legislation.

Trump’s reaction?

“Who is that state senator? I want to hear his name. We’ll destroy his career…”

Down in the comments there was this:

Maybe his next executive order will be to abolish the 4th ammendment.

And this:

Are you guys stupid? This is big government trying to take your assets before the convicted nobody should want this if you want to live in a free Society

And this:

Don, dude, the people who voted for you do not support the current civil asset forfieture regime (it’s, well, like a swamp monster for them). You reeeeeeealy are killing your base with this uninformed talk. Think about it, Don.

And this:

It is extremely upsetting that Trump is supporting the abolition of the 4th amendment. Civil asset forfeiture is the most grotesque form of fascism.

What people who like giving police this power forget is that they try these tactics out on the Drug War where it is relatively easy to get assent. And then once precedent is well set they roll it out on the rest of us. That way, if you go to court to resist the policy in your case, they have thousands of uncontested cases to point to. Very clever.

Trump should go back and reread his Ayn Rand. Or read this little ditty from Milton Friedman.

“Whose interests are served by the drug war? The U.S. government enforces a drug cartel. The major beneficiaries from drug prohibition are the drug lords, who can maintain a cartel that they would be unable to maintain without current government policy.” — Milton Friedman

Every time a politician claims to be fighting drugs what he really means is that he is aiding the Drug Cartels. I thought we learned that from Alcohol Prohibition. We didn’t even need Milton Friedman to tell us.

And as an addendum for the strict constitutionalists out there. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feral (not a misspelling) Government has no legal power to be doing what it is doing in aid of this Prohibition. And they are all in it together – no Republican or Democrat President in the last fifty (or more) years has stood against this policy of theft by government.

You can find out more about this policy (forfeiture) at Forfeiture Endangers American Rights.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

5 responses to “A Man Of the People”

  1. […] now that he is getting around to such “populist” ideas as renewed support for noxious policies like asset forfeiture, I am forced to ask a […]

  2. Simon Avatar

    Mike Pence’s home State legislature is trying to pass an Asset Forfeiture reform bill,

    Indiana Bill Takes On “Policing for Profit” Via Asset Forfeiture, Closes Federal Loophole
    http://www.activistpost.com/2017/01/indiana-bill-takes-policing-profit-via-asset-forfeiture-closes-federal-loophole.html

  3. ZZMike Avatar
    ZZMike

    Does anybody ever bother to check anything out?
    “PARTICIPANT: And I told him that the cartel would build a monument to him in Mexico if he could get that legislation.
    THE PRESIDENT: Who is the state senator? Want to give his name? We’ll destroy his career. (Laughter.) Okay, thank you.”
    “”He was making a point about how much he opposed that kind of philosophy,” Eavenson told the Dallas Morning News. “I appreciated what the president said. I can assure you that he is on our side.”

  4. Simon Avatar

    ZZMike,

    From what I can tell of the exchange Trump is on the side of the sheriffs. He favors Asset Forfeiture without due process.

    Evidently neither Trump nor the Sheriffs favor the 5th Amendment. Now Trump may have made a mistake. But the sheriffs?

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.