Elections undecided by midnight are void & preempted by federal law – Foster v Love 97; 9-0 Decision
The year 1997 means Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a justice at the time. So was Clarence Thomas.
Deciding Elections
by
Tags:
Elections undecided by midnight are void & preempted by federal law – Foster v Love 97; 9-0 Decision
The year 1997 means Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a justice at the time. So was Clarence Thomas.
by
Tags:
Comments
4 responses to “Deciding Elections”
You think the supreme court will pull another 2000 and negate the votes of 20,000,000 voters. I will take the other side of that bet. This ain’t 2000 with third way corporate democrats rolling over and playing dead. The rethuglicans on the supreme court know it would cause another civil war and they would get it first!
You think the Supreme Court will follow the law? I too have my doubts. That does not speak well for our system.
A 9-0 decision and you expect the Supreme Court to void that because politics? Banana Republic.
Lifelong racist China Joe is perfect for our country.
If the Supremes void the election in those States it will be because the States didn’t follow the law.
“We have always done it that way” – not any more if the court is honest.
I can see Democrats getting violent over this. I can see Napoleon – “give them a wiff of grape.” When you want mob action you also want a strong man, historically. I believe Trump is cold hearted enough for the job. LOL.
Democrats have been whipped into a frenzy. With knives. It ends in a bloody mess.
The Biden FAMILY is under investigation. LOL I’m glad Republicans are returning the favor.
Turn out the lights the partys over! Supreme court votes 9 to zip Tex haul ass out of here! We rethuglicans on the supreme court have plans for ameriKKKa and we don’t want dump getting in the way. We will make democrats enraged soon enough so go hold hearings on hunter biden and swallwell. If you want to keep challenging the election do it in congress unlike the democrats refused to do in 2000,2004 and 2016.