A Professor at Wake Forrest is in trouble with the SJW crowd over something he penned about Islam.
“I come from the American Left. I am a feminist. I am a gay rights activist,” he begins. “Consequently, the argument I am about to make for tighter U.S. controls on immigration of Muslims may surprise some readers. It shouldn’t.”
Gilreath goes on to claim that “Islam is endemically antithetical to the well-being of gay people,” contending that “If anything approaching this kind of destruction had been unleashed under the banner of any political organization, the Nazis or Klan for examples, the Left would be quick to condemn and short on tolerance for adherents who ask us to believe that they only subscribe to the ideology’s nonlethal tenets,” but that “because this mayhem is perpetrated in the name of religion…the gloves stay on.”
And here is the capper:
The article spawned a demonstration on campus by students who claimed that his article was “offensive and overgeneralizing,”
How do you get collectivism without over generalizing? As I have said before, “The ideal of socialism is that everyone gets enough to eat. The ideal of capitalism is that everyone gets what they want to eat.”
H/T Athos.
Comments
2 responses to “Collectivists Shouldn’t Generalize”
I agree if you believe in sharia law that says kill the gays no come in here! bill maher has it right.
Not just Bill Maher – a lot of other people. He’s just the only one who seems to be getting away with speaking truth to idiots.