“The President of the United States doesn’t respond to taunts.”
Mostly he issues them. And then denies issuing them. Sometimes on the same day!
“At no point have I ever suggested, for example, that someone is a war monger meaning they want war,” Obama asserted.
..
During the White House press briefing this afternoon, Obama’s press secretary Josh Earnest defined an upcoming political rally opposing the deal as a “pro-war rally.”
Because of course he did.
Anyways, we all know how dignified this President has been.
Trump’s crass media-driven popularity won’t last past the first serious round of attack ads (merely quoting him should suffice), but this administration manages to make him seem credible by contrast.
Comments
8 responses to “Troll Level: Double Reverse Meta”
those who oppose iran deal do not want to allow iran to get bomb so they want war with iran that makes them war-mongers. To con people since they are neo-con artists they say they don’t want war but can’t say how they will stop iran from getting the bomb without war again they are war-mongers.
Do you or do you not want Iran to have nuclear weapons?
The whole thing has become so farcical that show such as Veep and The Brink look more like documentaries than spoofs or comedies.
It is now assumed that the President and VP (and senior leaders in Congress) are stupid narcissists surround by butt-kissing toadies.
“It is now assumed that the President and VP (and senior leaders in Congress) are stupid narcissists surround by butt-kissing toadies.”
Who else would want to run for office in today’s toxic environment? If Jesus Christ ran for president as a Republican with the Buddha for veep they’d be dragged through the mud.
The beauty of the constitutional system as it existed was that the government was so limited and the power was inherently split up so that it didn’t matter much what kind of corrupt, incompetent criminal scum got elected.
“It is now assumed that the President and VP (and senior leaders in Congress) are stupid narcissists surround by butt-kissing toadies.”
Perhaps because they are? Most politicians are. And that includes mayors and dogcatchers…
Suggestion for a completely unrelated thread:
National Review since Buckley: fustian, boring, redundant, plodding, reflexive knee-jerk, predictable conservatism, and just plain dull, or what?
What used to make the Spectator (the London one) entertaining was that they didn’t care how Tory or Labour someone was as long as they wrote well. Ramesh Pondero and his boring clique of righty-tighty clones could take a lesson from that.
“At no point have I ever suggested, for example, that someone is a war monger meaning they want war,” Obama asserted.
I am so effing sick at listening to these democraps parsing words to death. Nothing means anything, whatever the meaning of “is” is. Gimme Trump!
Over at PJ Media Susan Goldberg is claiming Trump supporters want to destroy the Republican party. Allow me to offer a bipartite answer to that one, Susie.
1) The Repugnican party is destroying itself by betraying every reason anyone voted them in. “We won’t be fooled again”- some rock group
2)Effing burn it to the ground, they deserve it, the effing scumbag democrat-lite bastards!!!!