DNA, PTSD, And Abused Children

About 20% of the population have the genes for long term PTSD. About half those get enough trauma to initiate PTSD.

Now correlation is not causation but it is suggestive. About 10% of the American population has PTSD. About 10% of the American population are chronic drug users. Alcohol, pot, heroin, cocaine, meth, etc.

So you have to ask yourself. Why isn’t more being done to educate people on the connection between PTSD and chronic drug use? Well it would blow out of he water the whole “drugs cause addiction” idea. And a LOT of money rides on having a significant part of the population believing that idea.

Now we could make a start with DNA testing. We don’t have a test for PTSD. But we do have a DNA test for susceptibility to it. From: DNA of PTSD:

The genetic triggers for ADD/ADHD have been identified on several chromosomes in our genome. For example ADHD (Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) is recognised as one of the conditions that is perpetuated in families with PTSD (Yehuda, 2002). It is therefore conceivable that chromosome #5 may also play a significant part in the genetic transmission of other PTSD symptoms as a succeptibility exists in this gene. Focus for physical and personality traits is not on the “gene” itself, but on a segment of gene that contains the base letters that build a specific protein.

An abstract from the NIH: PTSD and DNA Methylation in Select Immune Function Gene Promoter Regions: A Repeated Measures Case-Control Study of U.S. Military Service Members.

Background: The underlying molecular mechanisms of PTSD are largely unknown. Distinct expression signatures for PTSD have been found, in particular for immune activation transcripts. DNA methylation may be significant in the pathophysiology of PTSD, since the process is intrinsically linked to gene expression. We evaluated temporal changes in DNA methylation in select promoter regions of immune system-related genes in U.S. military service members with a PTSD diagnosis, pre- and post-diagnosis, and in controls.

And from Genome Advance of the Month – Child abuse leaves epigenetic marks By Roseanne Zhao, Ph.D. – NIH Medical Scientist Training Program Track 3 Scholar

In addition to harming the immediate wellbeing of the child, maltreatment and extreme stress during childhood can impair early brain development and metabolic and immune system function, leading to chronic health problems. As a consequence, abused children are at increased risk for a wide range of physical health conditions including obesity, heart disease, and cancer, as well as psychiatric conditions such as depression, suicide, drug and alcohol abuse, high-risk behaviors and violence.

They are also more susceptible to developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-a severe and debilitating stress-related psychiatric disorder-after experiencing other types of trauma later in life.

Part of the explanation is that child abuse can leave marks, not only physically and emotionally, but also in the form of epigenetic marks on a child’s genes. Although these epigenetic marks do not cause mutations in the DNA itself, the chemical modifications-including DNA methylation-change gene expression by silencing (or activating) genes. This can alter fundamental biological processes and adversely affect health outcomes throughout life.

New research, published in the May 14, 2013, issue of the Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences, shows that PTSD patients who were abused as children have different patterns of DNA methylation and gene expression compared to those who were not.

What is most interesting to me is that the information is out there – I knew to look for it – but it has not reached the general public. It is almost as if the press was in cahoots with the DEA. But who could believe such a thing? Everyone here knows the press does its best to keep Americans well informed. Except in this particular case.

So my prohibitionist friends – do you favor continuing the war on abused children and their efforts to seek relief from the condition? You see – as this information gets out the kids are dropping Christianity. Why? Well would a Christian nation continue for 70 years or more to abuse abused children? My Christian Prohibitionist friends will be happy to see that I’m doing my part to get the information out.

Update:

Another good article on the subject: The Road to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Begins at the Intersection of DNA and Childhood Trauma

Our genetic predispositions are only part of the equation when it comes to determining our risk for developing psychiatric disorders. Exposure to stressful environments during critical periods of brain development plays a dramatic role in changing gene function and influencing response to traumatic events in adulthood.

The National Institute of Mental Health defines post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as an anxiety disorder arising in the aftermath of living through a dangerous or traumatic event. In PTSD the “fight-or-flight” response to fearful stimuli is activated in situations where it is not necessary for the body to defend itself from harm. It does not affect every individual who has been exposed to trauma. A major question in the field is how variations at the molecular level alter the likelihood that a person will develop PTSD.

In an insightful paper recently published in Nature Neuroscience, Klengel et al. shed light on the mystery of how genetic variability and life experiences alter our chances for developing neuropsychiatric disorders later in life. The authors identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (DNA sequence variations that differ across members of the population) in the FKBP5 gene. Variations in this gene alone were not enough to predict adult PTSD, but if the individual had been exposed to trauma as a child and had the genetic variation, the chances increased. Gene-environment interaction is a term used to explain situations where an individual’s likelihood of having a particular disorder or disease is dependent on a risk allele that arises from exposure to a specific environment early in life.

The researchers continued their quest by pinpointing the specific DNA change underlying the increased risk for developing PTSD later in life. During development, our DNA undergoes changes that result in the addition or removal of methyl groups. Methylation modifies DNA and can result in increased expression of a particular gene or gene silencing. Traumatic events can change DNA methylation beginning during development and continuing through adulthood. The researchers observed that FKBP5, which is a risk allele for a stress response regulator, had an altered methylation state in children exposed to trauma.

A video on the Limbic system – Hallucinations, PTSD

Cannabis for PTSD

More information and videos at DNA, PTSD, Abused Children, and Cannabis


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

8 responses to “DNA, PTSD, And Abused Children”

  1. Donna B Avatar
    Donna B

    30, maybe 40 years ago, I read that 10% of the population had a drug or alcohol addiction and that the percentage hadn’t changed and wouldn’t.

    Now that was a long time ago… and laws & enforcement concerning drugs are the same or more harsh, yet the 10% still holds.

    Hmmm… maybe laws can’t change addiction.

  2. Simon Avatar

    Laws can’t change pain.

  3. aguila2011 Avatar
    aguila2011

    This all sounds like a bunch of hooey to me. What does DNA have to do with POST TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME – PTSD? A random segment of the population experiences some kind of trauma, something so significant to “them” that their world changes. This is random also.

    It is like those who experience combat (war) and some survive physically and mentally while others suffers almost immediate effects on the battle field. Others have delayed reactions, sometimes years later. Why don’t we stop looking for funding dollars and just accept that some people are wired differently and some can handle more of some things while others can’t. Doesn’t make them bad people, just different. Trying to find a DNA link seems ridiculous to me. Then when someone “eureka!” discovers this, they will have a lot of explaining to do about under just what specific circumstances this deviant DNA will be activated. Again, sounds like a lot of hogwash to me. Someone should go get a real job.

  4. Simon Avatar

    aguila2011,

    We are talking long term PTSD. It is in fact genetic. If you want to confirm that look up “PTSD genetic”. You will find many pages of references. You can even find out which gene codes for it.

    The only reason it sounds like hogwash to you is because you are unstudied in the matter. You can remedy that if you wish. I have been looking at this for about 10 years. I first figured it out around 2002 when the information was sparse. It was in fact discovered a few years before I did. It is now common knowledge among those who study it.

    Everybody gets short term PTSD with enough trauma. It lasts much longer for those with the “right” genes. That long lasting is what we call PTSD – when it is a long term debilitating condition.

    As to how much trauma? That is hard to measure. But we do know that those coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan have about a 20% to 30% rate of long term PTSD.

    Yes trying to find the DNA link now IS ridiculous. It has already been found and is mapped.

    ==============

    And yes the stress/trauma is somewhat random. In “ordinary” life only about 1/2 those with the gene sequence get their PTSD potential activated.

    ============

    But no need to believe me. Study it on your own.

    Since you seem so incurious I’ll leave some more links for those who might actually be interested.

    https://www.google.com/#q=ptsd+genetic

    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/243717.php

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120402093509.htm

    http://news.yahoo.com/ptsd-risk-linked-genetics-190300364.html

    http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/05/02/child-abuse-later-ptsd-show-distinctive-genetic-signature/54377.html

  5. Simon Avatar

    From our memory-centered perspective, two conclusions are evident: First of all, the fear memory model clearly states how cumulative trauma exposure increases the risk of the development of pathological memories in a dose-dependent manner. This strong environmental predictor can simply not be neglected. To obtain valid results, genetic association studies on PTSD risk should investigate gene×environment interactions by modeling traumatic load quantitatively. Second, genetic factors which modulate PTSD risk most likely influence the way traumatic experiences are consolidated in a pathological fear memory structure. The anatomical structures which are involved in fear memory formation are well described and comprise the amygdala, the medial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus.

    http://www.hdbp.org/psychiatria_danubina/pdf/dnb_vol24_no3/dnb_vol24_no3_278.pdf

    What I have given in the post is a short hand description of PTSD. You can get more detail by following the links or finding your own.

  6. […] Well ok. I might as well go back to the article that I linked Maybe It Isn’t All In Your Genes – which discusses the heritability of addiction. You might also want to look up my recent DNA, PTSD, And Abused Children. […]

  7. […] you know from my article DNA, PTSD, And Abused Children, and others, PTSD is a favorite topic of mine. So how about a look at sexual orientation and PTSD. […]