Moving The Movement

The Conservative Tree House is looking into how Julison Communications orchestrated the rise of the Trayvon Martin case to national prominence.

Ryan Julison (pictured here) was hired by Trayvon family attorney’s Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump to create the initial image of “Trayvon Martin” and consequently “George Zimmerman”.From the outset the media hook, created by Julison, was baited with innuendo of racist intent. Simply, it made for a more appetizing media story. Once the media took the bait and ran with the completely racist shooting narrative, Julison did nothing to correct the falsehood.

Ryan Julison specifically and intentionally used this narrative to launch a media image campaign to benefit his clients Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton. Professional spin, combined with the professional obfuscation and ommitance of facts.

Ah. But there is more. From the comments:

His Facebook page also represents he is involved with Black farmers settlement (Breitbart-Pigford?) which would lend to some reasonable speculation that Julison’s “involvement” is also coordinated with assistance of the WH “optics” team.

You need to read the whole thing and follow the links to get up to speed.

In light of all that the author of the piece is asking for help.

We need to chase down the angle of Pigford networking to his *cough* “PR” firm and find the network. It’s gonna be another deeply riddled group of associations. If Julison is connected to the fraud we know Pigford to be then that explains the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) immediate involvement, with Sharpton, Jackson, Jealous etc etc….

If you look back on the Trayvon updates I mentioned a couple of times how similar the Trayvon framing was to the Pigford scam(s).

People wanted to know what they could do to help? Well, here’s an opportunity. All readers start researching the network(s) and find the connections between Pigford, the CBC, and the Ryan Julison media consulting/imaging firm.

Where is this going to lead…. ? Much discovery is yet to be found. Drop any leads here and we’ll begin assembling the angles, and connecting the dots.

And for those lawyers among us I thought this comment from some one claiming to be a lawyer was interesting.

For now, you should note that Mr. Julison’s primary business and focus is NOT crisis management, it is working with attorneys to get publicity for their cases. (I said in the attached file why attorneys would want to use a PR firm, the FINANCIAL BENEFITS being the ONLY motive for attorneys wanting publicity.)

In the litigation I expect Zimmerman to file against NBC, MSNBC, Sharpton, and The Scheme Team I will be most curious about the communications between The Scheme Team and Julison’s business.

And Mr. Julison advertises his connections to The Today Show. In the scandal where NBC is shown to have doctored 911 audio tape to support The Scheme Team’s “Zimmerman is a racist” narrative, I expect the civil litigation attorneys to depose NBC employees, Crump, the other lawyers, the Martin family, and Mr. Julison.

I am now really curious who said what to whom, if anything, about doctoring the 911 audio, and getting the 911 audio played to millions of viewers. After all, an audio department employee, or the producer would NOT be able to get this kind of stuff on the air without round tabling it with quite a few people, especially since the allegation was so explosive …

If we can bust these guys wide open in the next few months it should have a tremendous impact on the election. Not necessarily in Obama’s favor. Get crackin.

And like a gift that keeps on giving, Jeralym Merritt of Talk Left noted this comment by the Martin’s lawyer, Benjamin Crump.

“The lying has begun,” Mr. Crump told CNN.

And opined:

That is completely unacceptable. Lawyers should not opine on the “character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of any party or witness.” (see below) Prediction: Some lawyer somewhere will file a grievance petition against him before this case is over.

If we all pitch in (one way or another) I believe we can defeat Obama while providing ourselves with entertainment for years to come. Let me repeat. Get crackin.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “Moving The Movement”

  1. ItsMichaelNotMike Avatar
    ItsMichaelNotMike

    I was doing some follow-up research on Julison and happened upon this page(yes, here it is Sept. 11, 2012, and the Zimmerman case has NOT gone away).

    In this blog entry you mention “some one claiming to be a lawyer…” That was my post and I am in fact a lawyer in California.

    The foundation for my comment on the WHY and MOTIVATION lawyers on cases retain PR people was from personal observation since 1985, specifically in my seeing and understanding why lawyers were motivated to retain (very expensive) publicists or PR firms to work on particular cases.

    Lawyers don’t “do PR” to obtain justice for the client. Ultimately, lawyers use PR outfits to make money. (And PR outfits are a business too. They don’t take on causes and work cases for free. They have bills to pay, families to support, kids to send to college, and want to be able to buy nice things.)

    Out-of-context: Julison took down his “Julison Communications” pages. Screen captures I have of the deleted pages show Julison marketing his services to lawyers, a 2011 relationship with attorney N. Jackson (who is working with RJ against Zimmerman), and bragging up his work on the Trayvon Martin case) I will let those pages speak for themselves on WHY Julison, Jackson, and Crump had a business relationship.

    http://litigationuniverse.com/JulisonSalesPitchToLawyers.pdf

    http://litigationuniverse.com/JulisonSummaryBlogSiteEditedScrubbed.jpg

    http://litigationuniverse.com/JulisonBlogBeforeTakedownJacksonIsClient.jpg

    There’s an old saying that lawyers modify and tell PROSPECTIVE clients who are trying to retain the lawyer. It goes something like this:

    “I understand your desire for an apology from ________ and wanting justice, but my office is a business with overhead to pay. Unfortunately, obtaining apologies does not pay the bills, unless I would be content running a legal clinic at K-Mart. As an attorney I can get you MONEY. Eventually you will see money is a significant apology even though ‘I’m sorry” is rarely said by a wrongdoer.”

    Attorneys Crump and Jackson did NOT hire Julison to obtain justice for Tracy Martin, Sybrina Fulton, and Trayvon Martin. Everyone entered into a business relationship to MAKE MONEY.

    (If the motivation was NOT to make money then I am sure there are no contracts (retainer agreements) between Crump and Martin/Fulton, and Julison and whoever. Of course those agreements exist because it would be bad business not to have a contract binding someone like Tracy Martin to pay you money when the anticipated million dollar settlements start rolling in.)

    And make no mistake, Crump and Julison (the main co-conspirators) did not invest significant time and money in the Trayvon Martin case (labor, hard costs, employees, leases, vendors) because they wanted “justice for Trayvon Martin.”

    Naturally, when the exact attorney/client and publicist/client contractual relationships are revealed Crump will simply say: “What I meant by justice is that I would be obtaining money for my clients. You should know too that my clients intend to give most of the money to charity. That is, the 30% of any recovery they have remaining after paying taxes on parts of the settlements and our 60% contingency fees and costs.”(Crump won’t tell media the last sentence 🙂

    Lastly, take note that six months after the shooting my statements (allegations) have been proven correct. (Crump, et al., are in it for the money). How else to explain Crump is still around, even though he is not an attorney of record in the case. And Crump, et al., have fabricated evidence, tampered with witnesses, obstructed justice, and worked the media.

    And over time notice how Crump, et al., have kept changing their theories of the case. Specifically, they have gone from:

    “We just want an arrest, we want to know what happened;” to

    “Two shots were fired by Zimmerman, one to injure this (angelically portrayed) child walking with candy and ice tea, a second shot to execute this unarmed cherubic child.” to,

    “Race is the 600 lb elephant in the room; Zimmerman is a racist, the police are racists, the state attorney (Norm Wolfinger) is a racist; dad Robert Zimmerman is a racist, anyone who supports Zimmerman is a racist;” to,

    “We don’t know if Zimmerman is a racist or not;” and,

    “Zimmerman profiled this young black man (what happened to the child?) because he was wearing a hoodie (aka “hoodie profiling”);” and,

    “Zimmerman’s MO is to ‘take the law into his own hands’ by calling 911 when he sees what he thinks is suspicious activity by black people.”

    Further evidence indicating it is all about the money:

    – Sybrina Fulton made a financial claim against Florida’s victims assistance fund. (It is beyond the scope to discuss how Sybrina does not qualify to make a claim under the requirements/criteria listed by the state.)

    – Fulton, via attorney Jackson, has trademarked and copyrighted variations of Trayvon Martin’s name.

    – Fulton is the defendant on a declaratory relief action by Travelers Insurance, the E & O carrier for people who serve on The Retreat at Twin Lakes board or association. This is because Fulton has either made a claim to collect on the insurance policy or intends to make a demand. (Sidenote: IMO all courts should issue stays on any actions or claims filed by Fulton/Martin until there is a disposition on Zimmerman’s motion to dismiss where if the case is dismissed he gets immunity from civil suit. Immunity will have a ripple effect on all claims Fulton/Martin intend to make.)

    *end*

  2. […] Evidently the Martins have already collected over one million dollars. Minus lawyers fees and the cost of publicists. I wonder if Al Sharpton got a pay day out of this? Print PDF Categories: Uncategorized 0 […]