I really don’t understand how Stephen Green managed to drunk-blog this morning’s Tiger Woods apologia, but he did. There is not enough alcohol in the world to get me through such a thing.
But alcohol is a funny, perhaps cosmic, thing. After drinking a few glasses of wine, I remembered Stephen’s bravery, and I thought I would at least take a look at the actual apology. I always liked Tiger Woods (who seems like a basically decent guy, the scandals notwithstanding), but I couldn’t get past the first few seconds.
Here’s the YouTube video. Perhaps others can stand to watch it. I can’t. Whether his pain is real or not, there’s too much pain, and not enough relief. (Some people get their kicks from champagne, but drunk or sober, I get no kick from schadenfreude.)

He says he’s sorry, and Stephen thinks he really is.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t, but the point is, he did apologize (even if I can’t stand to revel in it).
I guess that means that the comparisons that have been made between him and the president should end.
MORE: I don’t listen to Glenn Beck, nor have I read his book, but I keep seeing claims on the left that in his book, Beck actually claims that Tiger Woods is worse than Pol Pot, Adolf Hitler, and a number of others:

In his chapter titled, “U.S. Presidents: A Steady Progression of Progressives,” Beck treats us to his list of the “Top Ten Bastards of All Time.” The occupants of that list, in ascending order, are Pol Pot, Robert Mugabe, Teddy Roosevelt, Bernie Madoff, Adolf Hitler, Keith Olbermann, Pontius Pilate, FDR, Tiger Woods, and Woodrow Wilson.

Does anyone know whether the book actually says that?
If so, the next question is simple one. Is the man serious? If not, then it’s just comedy and no big deal.
Because if he really does think that way, he’s not helping the conservative cause in which many of his followers believe.
MORE: I earnestly hope Glenn Beck either didn’t say what he’s reported as saying or that he is joking (and is a buffoon as opposed to a loon), because according to Mark Tapscott, he was taken very seriously at CPAC (including calls for him to run for president):

Beck’s address certainly confirmed him as a front-rank figure in the conservative movement. But I think it will help define Beck as one of the narrative setters for the movement, not as a candidate. But of course, politics is the most unpredictable of endeavours, so who knows.

Sorry, but I don’t think much of a “Tiger Woods is worse than Hitler” narrative.