A New Theory Of Electrodynamics


I have just sent this out to a group of physicists and scientists to see if it has any merit.
Here is the cover letter I sent:

George Miley of U Illinois, Champaign is involved.
I am passing this on after a cursory review. It was published yesterday. Please give it 5 minutes before you give up. The speed of light bit in the beginning was off putting for me. But it gets explained better later. The equations at first glance are compelling. They are better covered in the second 5 minutes. I’m going to review it more carefully with multiple stops to get a better feel. This is rapid fire and not typical lecture speed.
I’m more at home with engineering but I am at least conversant with all the material presented. I have also introduced the video to Lubos Motl to see what he thinks.

It will be interesting if anything comes of it.
Here are some of the documents in the video:
Evidence of Cold Fusion?
Impulse Gravity Generator?
Gravitomagnetic Field of a Rotating Superconductor
and of a Rotating Superfluid [pdf]

Researchers now able to stop, restart light
The Control of the Natural Forces by Frank Znidarsic [pdf]
BBC News – Boeing tries to defy gravity
Quantum Chemistry – McQuarrie
http://www.cravenslab.org
Tapping the Zero Point Energy

H/T jlumartinez at Talk Polywell
Cross Posted at Power and Control


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

3 responses to “A New Theory Of Electrodynamics”

  1. Eric E. Coe Avatar
    Eric E. Coe

    The physics/math is mostly over my software developer’s head (brings back memories of high school), but a couple of things were noticeable:
    1. Tying QM back into classical physics via. this backdoor is an enormously appealing feature.
    2. Magnifying the effect through the use of ordered lattices = CRYSTAL POWER! … Oh geez. I know people who are into crystals, pyramids, etc.. If it turns out to be true, we will never hear the end of it.

  2. ThomasD Avatar
    ThomasD

    My skept-o-meter redlines when I hear things like fusion ‘erupts from microscopic regions.’ But this may simply be an inartful attempt to describe something in lay terms.
    Claiming to have discovered the ‘path’ of a quantum transition is also rather interesting. While it is well beyond my ability to evaluate such claims, it does make one wonder, if there is an identifiable path is it really a quantum state? Either the path is discrete, and therefore merely presents alternative quantum states, or it is continuous and therefore ceases to be quantum in nature.
    Curious stuff.

  3. M. Simon Avatar

    Some of my physics friends thought the video was bunk. Others thought it was food for thought.
    I’m in the latter category. BTW massless drive was first considered in the Mach-Einstein Conjecture. So far neither proved nor disproved.