History is written by the victors.
Churchill

And so is morality.
In another reminder of the principle I touched on in the last post (that moral debates are won by those who yell the loudest), Jeff Jarvis links to a very tedious “Culture War” skirmish between the American Family Association and NBC. The AFA has decided that a television program (“The Book of Daniel”) — featuring a minister with a substance abuse problem — is an attack on Christianity and Christians.
Why would that necessarily be the case? Didn’t Jesus go out of his way and endure great criticism to befriend and hang out with disreputable people like drunks, tax collectors, and sinners of various stripes? Wasn’t Jesus the guy who Christianity was named for? I haven’t seen the series (it hasn’t aired yet), but in theory, why can’t a guy with a substance abuse problem be one of his ministers as long as he beliefs are sincere (which according to the website they apparently are)?
Can’t they at least watch the show before jumping to the conclusion that it’s against Christianity?
A major reason the AFA gives for opposing the show is that it’s written by a “practicing homosexual.” I’m assuming their argument is that this is bad on it’s face, because no Christian could possibly be a homosexual, because homosexuality is condemned as a sin in the Bible. But isn’t there someplace else where it says all Christians are sinners? Aren’t there also adulterous Christians, lying Christians, covetous Christians, and Christians who don’t always strictly obey the Sabbath? Is the AFA arguing that Jesus would want a background check run on all writers to see whether they’re free from sin? Furthermore, where do they get the idea that homosexuality was one of Jesus Christ’s primary concerns?
Is the AFA free from sin? If not, then who put them in charge?
One thing is sure: they’ll try to yell louder than anyone else.
That’s because they hope that their yelling will be seen as the only “Christian” voice. Loud, cacophonous, and unreasonable. Isn’t that how the godless secular atheist heathens want to portray all Christians?
Back to Jeff Jarvis, who raises an interesting point about fairness.

Change the channel. Go watch the 700 Club, which offends me, though I?m not trying to keep you from watching it.

Jeff’s point about changing the channel, of course, is lost on people who are not content with merely not watching something they don’t like; as he says, their goal is to stop other people from watching what they don’t like.
Again, assuming there is some right to not be offended, isn’t it possible that some Christians might find the 700 Club just as offensive as other Christians might find “The Book of Daniel”? Don’t they have just as much right to complain that the 700 Club presents Christianity in an unfavorable light, and does great damage to the cause of Jesus Christ? Legally speaking, they do, but they’re just not as loud in presenting their moral argument.
Whether it be a left wing or right wing variety, it’s because morality is often confused with volume that the loudest voices win.