|
November 17, 2010
What are those awful bigoted Arizonans smoking?
As Arizona has been much demonized lately, and is being subjected to a boycott, news that doesn't fit the "bigoted state" narrative is being under-reported. So there wasn't much national attention paid to the fact that on November 2, Arizona's "bigoted" voters approved Proposition 203, which made Arizona the 15th state to approve a medical marijuana law. State laws legalizing medical marijuana make a lot of people uncomfortable -- Federalism is a volatile issue, and I think its assertion in the drug war context threatens both the entrenched political right and the entrenched political left in so many ways that state marijuana initiatives are seen as politically disruptive. The left loves to invoke the specter of "states' rights" as an outmoded racist and bigoted legalism which we have "moved beyond." And while many conservatives favor states rights, they are not comfortable with it in the context of the war on drugs, which is unfortunately seen as a conservative issue. Plus, many "culture war" conservatives simply hate pot on a visceral level. Both sides would be delighted if issues like these medical marijuana ballot propositions just went away. The Supreme Court's seeming disposal of the medical marijuana issue on Commerce Clause grounds in Gonzales v. Raich only exacerbated this tension, and it is not clear at all that a similar case brought today would go the same way. Many commentators (including M. Simon) have noted that if the Commerce Clause allows federal jurisdiction over home-grown medical marijuana, then the federal ability to regulate health care is a no-brainer. From Justice Thomas's stinging dissent: Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything-and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.
The Court's definition of economic activity is breathtaking. It defines as economic any activity involving the production, distribution, and consumption of commodities. And it appears to reason that when an interstate market for a commodity exists, regulating the intrastate manufacture or possession of that commodity is constitutional either because that intrastate activity is itself economic, or because regulating it is a rational part of regulating its market.Sound familiar? If personal use of home-grown marijuana for health reasons is an economic activity subject to regulation under the Commerce Clause, then the purchase of health care would certainly be. And if a state cannot opt out of one federal law, it cannot opt out of another. Interestingly, right now the Obama administration is ducking the medical marijuana issue by deliberately failing to enforce federal marijuana laws in the states which pass these initiatives. WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration will not seek to arrest medical marijuana users and suppliers as long as they conform to state laws, under new policy guidelines to be sent to federal prosecutors Monday.Does this mean that the Obama administration would support a reversal of the Raich case? Not on your life. They hate states' rights, and love having the Commerce Clause trump everything. I'm sure they're delighted to have the Raich precedent left in place exactly as it is. In that respect, bringing another federal prosecution similar to Raich could possibly trigger a new appeal, and quite possibly a different result, so the seemingly liberal policy of not enforcing the federal marijuana laws actually helps preserve the heavy handed statist result in Raich. It ought to come in handy in the future. posted by Eric on 11.17.10 at 11:59 AM
Comments
I oppose medical marijuana for an entirely different reason. Medical marijuana is a mere dodge. There will be a 1:100 ratio between people who actually "need" the drug and those who go to their doctor to get high. There is already too much support for treating doctors as illicit drug dealers when they prescribe legitimate medications. Medical marijuana will make this effect much, much worse because a drug that is popularly known to be otherwise illegal will be "prescribed". There will be arrests, and since they will be related to pot, they will be covered by the media. The "doctor as dealer" will become a social problem, and politicians will pledge to deal with it, and they will chose enforcement methods that will make it even harder for me to get my Vicodin when I break my leg. Either legalize pot, or do not. Do not use this halfway measure that screws things up for people who don't have anything to do with the activist morons who claim that only pot brownies can ease their pain. Ryan Waxx · November 20, 2010 03:27 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2010
October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
If one in five of us are Eloi, then who are the Morlocks?
Prohibitions Libertareconomics 101 Did I impose on PETA last night? Libertarianism is dictatorial collectivism. And freedom is slavery. Letter To A Friend Sick of whatever I'm sick of, but how sick! This Is An Order A Split You're not special, but WE are -- an open letter to President Obama
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I remember our social conservative friends cheering the outcome of Raich. It will now come bake to bite them. Karma (not a Christian idea) is a bitch.
But as ye so so shall ye reap is a Christian idea. Reap it and weep.