I can't decide what's funnier in all this: that Krugman thinks this arms treaty is "desperately needed," that he likens spending cuts to "blood lust" while claiming the GOP won't do anything to address deficits, or his intimation that the GOP having a voice on spending may mean the end of the Republic as we know it.

Via HotAir so, stealing from the prodigy whose ingenious photoshops on the AIITH blog (some of us remember) gave us so much subversive joy after 9/11, I'll ask an exit question: Who wants to bet Krugman loses all interest in reducing deficits when the new Tea-infused GOP raises serous Social Security reform?