|
October 10, 2010
"There is a major change occurring within conservative thought."
That's what one advocate says about an idea floated by Michael Savage (a man I can't stand) to impose a 20% tariff on all Chinese goods: In his book that just came out today, "Trickle Up Poverty," Conservative talk show host Michael Savage has proposed a tariff on Chinese goods in order to restore America's manufacturing sector, specifically:That's just the kind of "conservative" change we need. A Freeper calls it the Smoot-Hawley-Savage Tariff: One of Savage's proposals is to raise tariffs on China. Maybe he can call it Smoot-Hawley-Savage .Imposing protective taxes on Chinese goods (along with Savage's related proposal to tax all foreign automobiles, including those made here) is anything but conservative, if we assume conservatism means economic freedom and free markets. And if history is any guide, protective tariffs are just about the worst thing that could be done to the economy right now. But that goes to the merits of what he says about one subject. There is more to Savage than merely bad ideas. It's not so much that he says things that irritate me so much as the way he says things. I would hate hearing him say something I agreed with, for the guy's voice just plain grates on my nerves, and gives me the creeps, and has since I first heard him at the young and impressionable age of 41. At 56 I might not be young, but I'm still impressionable. Or maybe it's just that whatever the process is that causes grating things to grate on the nerves worsens with age. Grating things seem to grate more than they used to, and not only was Savage one of more grating things I have endured, he seems to have gotten even more grating. So while I'm less tolerant, he's also less tolerant -- which makes him less tolerable for me. And life is too short. Perhaps I should ignore him in the hope that he will just go away, but I have long suspected the man was a Democratic or leftist plant of some sort, and he has been caught giving money to Democrats. But I'm not sure that this proves he is necessarily part of some grand conspiracy to confuse and destroy the right. He might simply be doing what he does for the money. He has a personality that is unique in its ability to simultaneously enliven and stimulate his "choir," while nauseating those who aren't in the choir. Interestingly, the latter group includes people who might agree with him on the issues: Something about Savage has always rubbed me wrong. I share his outrage at the immigration disaster, and several other issues, but I just get the willies when I listen to him.I always thought it was no accident that he started in San Francisco. I first heard him when I was disgusted with the Clintons and leaning towards the right, and I have to say that he would have given me pause, but I was smart enough not to take the bait. I believe he has kept many a leftist on the left, especially those who are not capable of suspending their emotions long enough to realize that he does not speak for everyone on the right, much less conservatism, and disliking him should not translate into disliking the right (any more than disliking Keith Olbermann should translate into disliking the left, much as we who are to the right of Olbermann might hope it will). I think Savage could use a lesson in civility from Ann Coulter, but I should be careful what I wish for. As to why his book with its tariff advocacy is being released now in October (on the heels of an election), that might just be another coincidence. After all, no genuine conservatives would support protective tariffs, would they? It's the sort of thing that might encourage divisions. MORE: It occurred to me that the call for protectionism may be Savage's way of attacking Glenn Beck (who advocates free trade, especially with China), and I learned that Savage has ridiculed Beck's eye problems: Michael Savage attacks Glenn Beck; calls him the 'hemorrhoid with eyes', crazy, and a fraud (among other things) after Glenn announces he may be going blind.I was surprised to see what a low regard most of Freepers have for Savage. Just look at these: "I shut that guy off a long time ago. He is mentally ill."Wow. I would have expected him to be more popular there. While there is no way to prove it, Savage's call for protectionism may very well be a politically insincere ploy, calculated simply to target Beck. If the guy is in fact the trollish provocateur I have long suspected him to be, perhaps I shouldn't be writing about him at all. posted by Eric on 10.10.10 at 02:54 PM
Comments
It is one thing to have tension between fiscal and social conservatives, but what worries me here is to see a populist wedge driven right into free market conservatism -- by a demagogue who claims to support the fiscally conservative, free market Tea Party movement. Do they have to fuck with economic conservatism too? Or is this just Savage's typically contrived way of trying to mess with Glenn Beck? http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/233/41366/ Eric Scheie · October 10, 2010 04:40 PM I actually enjoy him & find him more interesting than most on talk radio. Some of his ideas are out there, but some are on the mark. He has a breadth of knowledge that's rare on talk radio, hence his derision of "Rush Bimbo" & Hannity (the Wallbanger, a elitist slur referring to Hannity's days as a construction worker) & O'Reilly (the Leprechaun). He despises Coulter, & accurately described Levin's radio voice as "Groucho Marx's grandmother after a hysterectomy" jeff · October 10, 2010 06:32 PM Jeff, welcome back! I have missed Beautiful Atrocities, and I'm so delighted to see you stop by that I won't even disagree with what you said! (Nor will I ask how much Savage paid you to say it...) Eric Scheie · October 10, 2010 06:42 PM Savage is a horrible, bitter kvetch if you ask me. He's either a troll or psychologically disturbed, or most likely both. Nothing he says should be taken as indicative of conservative thought generally. Can he go half an hour without referring to his PhD from Berkeley? I'm not impressed. @Jeff: Do you really think his derision at his competitors is due to his great breadth of knowledge, rather than that they're, you know, his competition? DJ · October 10, 2010 07:31 PM Would you consider Jerry Pournelle a populist, or a closet liberal? Would you be interested to know that he's consistently advocated tariffs for a number of years now? Does this make any difference in your public position? (I doubt it {g}) Casey · October 17, 2010 11:42 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
What Coco doesn't know won't hurt her
Trade runny ruins Craigslist Crackdown Conspiracy Coverup A Shift On The Left? Complications Is sexual freedom now an official heresy? Cheery News - It Is Way Worse Than We Thought When Money Is At Stake Protect us from the toxins we consume -- and the toxins we emit!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
What Savage forgets is that without low cost inputs you can't sell to the global market.
Savage has no clue that outputs = inputs.
In fact he is ignorant of Riccardo.