|
October 03, 2010
my preliminary estimation of mysterious satellite activities
As I kept reading about "preliminary satellite estimates" of the crowd at the lefty Ed Schultz rally yesterday, I wanted to know what the term meant. It is repeated verbatim at countless left wing blogs, but it seems to have originated with a statement from a person named Nicole Belle at Crooks and Liars: Preliminary satellite estimates put the crowd size at 175,000 to 200,000 at about noon EST.That's it. No link to any "data," not even so much as a quote from anyone purporting to work for whatever satellite data entity is supposed to be providing the "preliminary" estimates. Nor is Ms. Belle's statement attributed to organizers. My preliminary opinion is that it's pure political hogwash wrapped in an official-sounding lie. Like making something up and attributing it to "top scientists." PJM's Charlie Martin is also skeptical, and has a good question: Where do they get these satellite estimates? PJM has been completely unsuccessful finding satellite companies that can give us these sorts of pictures on demand; there isn't a satellite passing over Washington, D.C., any time you want one.Aside from "they" who linked her, the only source seems to be Nicole Belle, who has not said where she got her alleged satellite estimates. What I'd like to know is why she would call them "preliminary." There either are available data from satellites or there are not. If someone has already done preliminary estimates based on that data, then presumably there is another, more definite estimate soon to come. How could the analysis and estimating be going on without anyone anywhere identifying whoever is supposed to be doing the estimating or citing any actual satellite source? There is a video showing Joe Madison speaking to the crowd about a "satellite image" alleged by the organizers to exist, but nowhere is anyone quoted by name who actually saw it, or even who says he saw it. So where is it? Freepers are saying it does not exist, and that if it did, it would be all over the Internet. But what is all over the Internet is Nicole Belle's claim of "preliminary satellite estimates." That there are a lot of gullible people ready and willing to believe anything that sounds as if it confirms what they want to hear does not surprise me. But for them to be claiming to rely on satellite data when no one has provided a single confirming reference or link, that's too much. I think it's worse than vandalizing Asimov, and I got pretty worked up about that, so writing this post seemed to be the least I could do. However, unlike the case of the butchered Asimov essay, this problem is not so easily solved, for there really was an original Asimov essay, but I am completely unable to find any satellite image of the rally. It's odd that the lefties who are citing it and claiming estimates based on it can't seem to provide a copy, isn't it? So I am forced to ask some questions. Since no one has the image, what happened? Why would the satellite fail to provide it? Precisely what did this satellite look like? Because if there was something hovering over the crowd (and surely there must have been, or why all the commotion?) then how do we even know it was a satellite? To leave no stone unturned in my search for the truth, I'm going stick out my neck and pose a few more questions. Might it be that what Ms. Belle thought was a satellite actually looked more like this? And can this "Nicole Belle" prove to everyone's satisfaction that she has not added that e to her name in the hope of disguising the fact that she's related to Art Bell? (All of this confusion could easily be cleared up!) So, much as I'd like to give her the preliminary benefit of the doubt, there's that old saying that goes "Trust but Verify!" I just want to see the data. Hell, it might be of assistance in evaluating this mysterious animated gif (link from Charlie Martin) contrasting the Glenn Beck rally with the Ed Shultz rally. I have a preliminary explanation as to why they are so different. Notice the huge swath of lawn on the left hand side they deliberately kept clear by moving away the hundreds of thousands of people that whatever flying object it was estimated? I think the most obvious explanation (which may be the Mother Of All Explanations) is that they wanted to keep it clear as a landing pad. I admit that this is speculation on my part, but I consider it my duty to be as helpful as possible in clearing up this baffling mystery, and I remain open to alternative theories. posted by Eric on 10.03.10 at 05:46 PM |
|
October 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2010
September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Some People Were Missed.
my preliminary estimation of mysterious satellite activities Gratuitous advice to the Republican leadership that isn't there (from a political nobody who doesn't follow them anyway...) "fast and loose with the facts"? Forward To Liberty A Song For This Season Good Advice You Want What?????????????? There is not enough, because there is never enough Bill Whittle Has Moved
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I always thought that if "they" were going to land they would use the flying saucer landing platform in the Bezerkeley hills.
http://berkeleynaturally.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/lhs-outside.jpg?w=400&h=300