![]() |
|
![]()
May 13, 2010
To the left of Obama on gay marriage. (The list grows...)
Roger L. Simon has a very thoughtful piece about Laura Bush's support for gay marriage. Yes, that Laura Bush. The former first lady. Barack Obama is now to the right of her on this issue. She proclaimed that support in her characteristic well-mannered, low-keyed fashion on Larry King Live. (Okay, nobody's perfect.) I even had the suspicion that her husband agreed with her, but for political considerations didn't say so.This of course begs the question of what is conservative and what is liberal. One of the things I always liked about Roger is that he doesn't get hung up on such words: So what are we to think? Who is the "progressive" and who is the "conservative"? And what do these words mean? Well, not much to me, as I have said.I have long had reservations about gay marriage (mainly because of privacy concerns -- which also extend to government jurisdiction over marriage generally), but I cannot understand how it is that this issue became such a huge threat to activists on one side, and the be-all and end-all it is to the activists on the other. What delights me about Laura Bush's remarks is the damage it will do to the ridiculous and ongoing culture war narrative. MORE: The anti-gay commenters at FreeRepublic are trying to get me to change my mind about gay marriage. (Well, so did Matt Barber, but I'm stubborn.) posted by Eric on 05.13.10 at 08:29 PM
Comments
Eric Says: Just another example (like Nancy Reagan and Barbara Bush on Abortion.) of people hiding their true beliefs for political convenience, thereby lying to the people who support them. They win the benefits of the support from their followers, than after they are no longer useful, inform them that they were chumps, and they never really loved them. Is it too much to ask that we can have people who actually believe in what they are saying as opposed to cynically manipulating people for political gain? Diogenes · May 14, 2010 01:44 PM Gee, I dunno, probably because intolerant gits like you go ballistic over every perceived deviation from the Revealed Truth? Why not cut off the heads of the unbelievers to encourage the others? Casey · May 24, 2010 03:49 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Family Feud
when tales become narratives, look out! Revisionist History The Narrative People A Republican You Can Believe In Rand Paul on the CRA Matt Barber and Andrew Sullvan care deeply about your sexual desires! Examining The Drug War Spain's Green Jobs Program A Disaster More minimalist Puppy Love
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Our politicians will not deal with the hard issues, that would require a decision, responsibility and accountability, not
traits apparent in people who believe and practice promise them everything give them nothing.