|
May 07, 2010
People who want to be left alone are racists! And Jacobins!
As I have pointed out in a number of posts, what I most like about the Tea Party movement is that it consists of largely of people who want the government to leave them alone. That's a new phenomenon in American politics, because traditionally, political activists tend to be people who want to tell others what to do. That is why they enter politics. But the American people have finally wised up to the fact that the only way to defeat activists is by becoming anti-activist activists. In a long intellectual criticism of the Tea Party Movement in The New York Review of Books (titled The Tea Party Jacobins"), University of Chicago professor Mark Lilla explains that wanting to be left alone is the driving force behind what he calls the "libertarian mob": Many Americans, a vocal and varied segment of the public at large, have now convinced themselves that educated elites--politicians, bureaucrats, reporters, but also doctors, scientists, even schoolteachers--are controlling our lives. And they want them to stop. They say they are tired of being told what counts as news or what they should think about global warming; tired of being told what their children should be taught, how much of their paychecks they get to keep, whether to insure themselves, which medicines they can have, where they can build their homes, which guns they can buy, when they have to wear seatbelts and helmets, whether they can talk on the phone while driving, which foods they can eat, how much soda they can drink...the list is long. But it is not a list of political grievances in the conventional sense.Obviously, Lilla does not believe in the right to be left alone, and thinks that someone simply has to be telling us how to wipe our asses. To his way of thinking, you'd have to be estranged, aimless, and juvenile not to want help with such things. What he misses about the Tea Partiers is that they're sophisticated enough to understand why ordinary activism has failed, and why they are not being left alone. Simply electing the right people to political office cannot fix the problem of entrenched bureaucracies which were designed to be politically bulletproof, and which basically dictate terms to the legislators whose job is to pass legislation endlessly expanding their power, while increasing the size and scope of their irreversible demands on taxpayers' money. And I do mean irreversible. Just get elected to even the lowest city council and try cutting staff positions or wages. They're unionized and they will simply take the city to court, where enforcing the terms of their union contracts is a legal slam-dunk. As to government pensions (which drain huge amounts of money), they are more of a legal entitlement than Medicare or Social Security, because the latter are not "entitlements" but acts of Congress which can in theory be revised or repealed. Government pensions are legally enforceable obligations. People who are legally owed money will demand and get it, regardless of whether the people who have to pay it ever consented to pay it, and regardless of whether they want to be left alone. The Tea Partiers have seen past the game of pretending the legislature really runs things when in reality they are obsequious scriveners for unelected elites. Unlike conventional politicians, this "libertarian mob" is actually willing to say "no more" to the bureaucratic ruling classes and mean it. This scares the crap out of them. posted by Eric on 05.07.10 at 03:33 PM
Comments
Dear me. Somewho who writes -- with a straight face -- of an increase in "an astonishing—and unwarranted—confidence in the self." thinks we do not have the right to be left alone. What a shock. Mary · May 7, 2010 10:03 PM Eric: RE: "PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE LEFT ALONE ARE RACISTS! AND JACOBINS!" The busy-bodies of the nanny state are essentially the same Wilsonian "progressives" who passed prohibition, demanded that American "make the world safe for democracy," and passed sedition laws during WWI that made it a crime to criticize the Wilson administration. One of the biggest lies of the last half century is placing fascism on the political right; it is in reality a variety of socialism, c.f. Goldberg's book "Liberal Fascism." These types can't abide by people who wish to mind their own business, and live their lives without interference, and expect the same from others. Like fascists, they use violence to enforce their edicts upon others; only it is (usually) delivered not by jackbooted thugs, but by bureaucrats in suits, carrying briefcases full of documents that restrict your freedom, drain your bank account, and tell you what to do. The essence of an iron fist in a velvet glove. Georgiaboy61 · May 8, 2010 02:40 AM "It fires up emotions by appealing to individual opinion, individual autonomy, and individual choice, all in the service of neutralizing, not using, political power." This was a way too long and tedious piece, but the above quote is accurate...provided we replace that "It" with "The internet". The language of the "ANGRY POPULOUS" is becoming remarkably similar, regardless of your horizontal persuasion... left to right, right to left. While Obama would have us go forward to read "news" on both right and left sites, let me suggest you go forward and read the comments. Just for the fun of it...haha...note that IT...start replacing pronouns with your choice of nouns. Are we ALL angrily "neutralizing" because we can't be, or chose not to be, more specific? I say "YES"! Not sure about you, meaning Classical Values' readers, but there is nothing I hate more than feeling "neutralized in the height of my anger". Penny · May 8, 2010 07:36 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Your home is your castle, and your computer is in your home. Right?
Hey man, cut me some SLACK! The Shape of Things to Come? GOP Ousts Senator Are we losing our freedom? (And other rhetorical questions....) Elitist roots oppose change Hammering Small Business It's Always About Greed People who want to be left alone are racists! And Jacobins! "Some people ain't made for small-town life"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Could he talk about middle-aged adults in a more condescending way? Lilla, as is common for the modern day statist, confuses society and government; they are not the same.
You're right Eric. What scares them is the fact that people neither want nor need their sage guidance in living their own lives.
Lastly, could there be anything more guided by naked self-interests than the welfare state? I mean, it is based on the forcible expropriation of money from one person for the benefit another. The poster child of the welfare state would be a teenager with their hand out going "Me, me, me!"