|
|
|
May 12, 2010
La Raza
La Raza means The Race. And some people call Tea Partiers racist. The gentleman in the video wants to take back the lands stolen from Mexico. In 1848. The war that started in 1846 was over whether Texas could join the Union ( Mexico was against it) and what the boundary with Mexico would be. I have a word of advice to La Raza in Greek. Molon labe. You can read what Presidet US Grant had to say about the war in: Ulysses S. Grant : Memoirs. The speaker in the video is a piece of work. He doesn't like Jews. He does like underage girls. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 05.12.10 at 05:17 PM
Comments
I'm still trying to figure out how, after stealing the land from Spain (through a war of independence), who originally stole the land from the Indians, how Mexico can lay claim to land which was then successfully stolen from them. Are they claiming their claim on this land comes from being the winners of the second-to-last war? William Woody · May 12, 2010 07:08 PM Why does this fellow fancy that if this land were given back to Mexico he would have the freedom to shout these kinds of ideas? Why does this fellow imagine that Asia is poor? He seems like a very confused young man. Someone should set him straight. Most of the chicanos I grew up with in New Mexico, though, would have just called him a wetback or a maricon and been done with it. @Wm.Woody: LOL. My guess here is that since most Mexicans are mestizo, their claim is that they're the *original* owners by virtue of their Indian descent. Julie · May 13, 2010 03:41 AM If we were all one race people would still discriminate, based on, age, weight, hair color, education or lack of education, Hugh · May 13, 2010 08:34 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• Seven years! (And they said it wouldn't last!)
• Is It His Katrina? Nyet! • I bought more than I bargained for. Or did I? • Blackout • erased from the national debate? • Best protection against sinister invaders • To the left of Obama on gay marriage. (The list grows...) • Jewish Anti-Semitism. Is such a thing possible? • The bullet did it. End of narrative? • Reality Check
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Short version: he thought it was wrong for the US to go to war with Mexico and called the US Civil War punishment for our transgressions against Mexico. I note that President Grant did not offer the territory back to Mexico. Wrong it may have been but it was a fait accompli.
If they want Texas back, we want reparations for the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Santa Anna first.