|
May 25, 2010
And they can't be fired!
Here's an incident epitomizing the stubborn bureaucratic recalcitrance which has the most of the country in a deathlock and which fuels the Tea Party Movement. A notorious (and famously incompetent) Philadelphia principal who presided over the racist attacks on Chinese students -- and who was found not even to be properly credentialed to be a principal -- had resigned her job in seeming disgrace. But -- it turns out she's still working for the school district! Well, you know, "working" should be in quotes, for she actually is not working. But she is being paid $124,000 a year by the taxpayers. Former principal LaGreta Brown is gone from troubled South Philadelphia High School but remains on the School District payroll at $124,000 a year, officials confirmed.Yeah, well big deal! Even the worst government bureaucrats cannot be fired, because they belong to powerful government employee unions with ironclad contracts, and armies of lawyers at their disposal to march into court end enforce their damned "legal entitlements." Of course, I don't live in the Philly area anymore. Not that that changes anything. The same ruling class runs things here. Actually, the Inquirer story reminded me of a report in the Mackinac Center's Michigan Capitol Confidential about the sweetheart union deals that educrats have even in this impoverished state. Naturally, the taxpayers know little or nothing about the details. Their only role is supposed to be to work in order to pay whatever the unions demand. In the Port Huron Area School District, about 70 percent of the $106 million operating budget goes towards paying employees covered by current collective bargaining agreements for teachers and a few other employee groups. Yet few people know what is in these or other school labor contracts.It goes on and on, for people who enjoy reading about things like the generous pension plans (similar to the ones that have bankrupted California). I think it's high time that government employee unions be made illegal. Maybe something like that should be placed on the ballot, for no legislature would ever dare pass it. That's because unlike the unelected union employees who really run things, elected legislators are timid creatures who actually can lose their jobs and therefore live in mortal fear that they will be fired. But suppose for the sake of argument that such a thing did make it onto the ballot and passed. Wouldn't the government unions simply pressure their lackeys in the court system to declare the measure "unconstitutional"? Yeah, yeah, I know. Another rhetorical question. (Next I'll be asking whether we 're living in Greece...) posted by Eric on 05.25.10 at 06:16 PM
Comments
Broken link to Philly.com article pst314 · May 25, 2010 09:57 PM If I recall correctly, Federal employees were allowed to unionize via an Executive Order by President John Kennedy. Could an Executive order legally rescind the privilege? Brett · May 26, 2010 07:48 AM Brett: it was JFK who done it. Gringo · May 26, 2010 09:33 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
How Many Has She Tricked?
And they can't be fired! "This incident will be reported." Outraged over outrage itself! Free Book Family Feud when tales become narratives, look out! Revisionist History The Narrative People A Republican You Can Believe In
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The traditional approach for opposing a problem such as this is to raise a public uproar and then hopefully persuade school board officials to change their policies. As demonstrated by years of prior experience, this approach has a minuscule probability of success. Perhaps it's time for a new approach. There are probably thousands of unemployed people in Philadelphia with plenty of time on their hands. They could organize mass demonstrations at the school board offices and demand similar no work jobs at the same salary. Why should they be denied their place on the public dole for non work jobs? Where is a community organizer when you need one?