![]() |
|
![]()
April 04, 2010
Fun with Linux on Easter!
Happy Easter, everyone! I've been offline for more than a day, and haven't had time to blog, but yesterday I saw my old friend Dean Esmay. Among other things, he was installing, tweaking, and playing with the latest version of Ubuntu Linux, and burned an extra CD for me. Dean is pretty excited about Ubuntu, and as a longtime, off-and-on Linux user, I have to say that I was amazed at the ease with which it was able to configure itself on an otherwise useless old Compaq latop someone had given Dean because it wouldn't accept an install of Windows XP. This just seemed so effortless and so instantly user-friendly that I couldn't wait to take it home and try it. You can run it off the CD and do just that as an evaluation, or you can do a total install alongside Windows. I tried it out very briefly last night on my main computer, and it configured itself with no problem. But that was not surprising, as the computer is reasonably new. It was late at night and I didn't have time to get into heavy tweaking, but I figured as the real test I would try it in my old clunker of a laptop, a Dell Latitude C-600, which runs at 850 Mhz, and has 500 megs of RAM. It runs XP, but slowly, and I don't use it much, as I have a newer Inspiron 700m for use on the road. Well, here it is, all fired up and running on the Ubuntu CD, and I'm writing this very post from the evaluation operating system on the CD. I didn't have to do anything except stick it in and turn it on! It did everything else, found the network, and is just incredibly FAST. This is almost like having a new laptop and not an old clunker. I am very, very impressed, and I highly recommend Ubuntu Linux. The version/a> I am using is 9.10, and it can be freely downloaded here. My thanks to Dean for turning me on to this and reiviving my interest in Linux, and I totally second what he says here: All those years of saying Linux is "not ready for prime time?" I'm not sure I can even say this. Installing Ubuntu was easier than installing Windows, and this thing is fast and remarkably stable. And very easy to work with, so far.Absolutely. But remember, kids, playing DVDs on Linux is a felony! So I would never advocate that, and heaven forfend that I would I ever be an accomplice to such a thing. posted by Eric on 04.04.10 at 06:03 PM
Comments
I have dealt a little w Ubuntu and other Linux sources. Can't play online Tetris with it, or at least I didn't know how to tweak it. I believe I had played DVDs all right on it. I need MS Access for my work, and it is too much of a hassle to transfer stuff over. So I will stay w XP. Gringo · April 4, 2010 11:28 PM I know this has been beaten to death, but have you tried Open Office? I like it as it just 'works' for me. Ubuntu really is the camel's nose for Linux. I prefer straight up Debian, but for noobs Ubuntu is crack on a stick. guy · April 5, 2010 12:10 AM I'm planning on partitioning my new 1.5 TB HD and my installed 1 TB Drive in about a week and was planning an Ubuntu partition. Along with an XP Partition and Probably a DOS/Windows Partition. There are some nice virtual machine suites on the 'net that I plan to use. I will report on how it goes. M. Simon · April 5, 2010 05:40 AM I have several flavors of Linux, including Ubuntu, running as VMs (via VMware Player) on my laptop. Bagley · April 5, 2010 03:27 PM Good stuff. I should really get a Linux box going. Might have to lean on Dean. It's funny, I do 90% of my work in HP-UX or AIX, but I've never installed any flavor of UNIX. TallDave · April 5, 2010 07:58 PM "But remember, kids, playing DVDs on Linux is a felony! So I would never advocate that, and heaven forfend that I would I ever be an accomplice to such a thing." Not always true. Only playing DVDs encrypted with CSS (copy protection) is a felony due to DCMA. mirradric · April 6, 2010 12:42 AM Guy: I looked at Open Office for its database "capabilities." Not user friendly at all. It was set up for allegedly easy transfer for those who had a version of Access 2007, but NOT for previous versions of Access. Not worth the hassle. Gringo · April 6, 2010 10:12 AM |
|
May 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
May 2010
April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Jewish Anti-Semitism. Is such a thing possible?
The bullet did it. End of narrative? Reality Check La Raza Moconology for those who want to moconomize What is gay? Mind if I ask? madly not caring Doing The Conservative Thing Happy Birthday, Salvador Dalí! You Can Already Count The Cost
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I used for 5 years it since Breezy Badger, but dumped it earlier this year for Arch Linux.
And there are derivatives out there: Crunchbang for minimal installs, and Linux Mint, which is basically Ubuntu + media codecs.