|
March 20, 2010
Taking another bite at the Marxist apple
There are a lot of theories about what looks very much like the image of a face on an apple in front of Michelle Obama on the latest Newsweek cover. I saw Ann Althouse's discussion, and she thinks it looks like Karl Marx. Here's Newsweek's incriminating apple, followed by Karl Marx: Whether it's Marx or not, considering the Biblical story of Eve, I think Newsweek would have been well-advised to kill the apple entirely. Which they did (except it's too late) and which Hillbuzz thinks is no coincidence: Early this morning, 3/16/10, it looks like the White House ordered Newsweek to crop the photo so the apple is no longer visible online. Newsweek has cut the table out completely, now, because whatever's going on in this photo was noticed by the public.So Newsweek has only compounded the problem and made itself look more guilty. The apple has reached the attention of Snopes, where there's some discussion of whether it looks like Osama bin Laden. The Anchoress (who seems familiar with the phenomenon of images appearing in food) is skeptical: But I'm a Catholic; I have learned to be skeptical of images in food.Gerard Van der Leun expresses skepticism from a photographic perspective: The face of (Muhammad) (Karl Marx) (Rasputin) (Jesus) that so many around the blogosphere are seeing today is, alas, a mere figleaf of their imaginations. Sorry, kids, it just isn't there.Far be it from me to spoil anyone's fun, but for the record, I don't think it looks like Muhammad, Marx, Osama, Rasputin or Jesus. But still, this is so much fun that if I could be permitted another bite at the apple, I'd like to go on record as saying it's the spitting image of Jerry Garcia. This was my initial reaction, and I am not alone. I just don't think the forehead shape and general hairline match Marx. But I have seen Jerry Garcia many times over the years looking exactly like the image in that apple. Here are two examples, found by Googling, followed by the apple: But why on earth would Newsweek deliberately insinuate an image of Jerry Garcia into Michelle Obama's apple? I doubt they would. And I certainly hope they didn't. Far be it from me to give food to the idea that 1960s acid rock was a form of "Cultural Marxism" or anything.... posted by Eric on 03.20.10 at 03:12 PM
Comments
We're being distracted by the image on the apple. The "apple" symbolizes death. As a Catholic I love the Marion theology of Grimm's Snow White, so my first thought on seeing the photo was of the wicked witch who offered Snow White the apple. MO offering the U.S. the apple of "health(care)" symbolizes death. Remember, evil will always tell you what it's about to do. Believe your lying eyes. L.B. · March 20, 2010 05:57 PM It is James Clerk Maxwell. M. Simon · March 20, 2010 08:11 PM I first saw this story at The Anchoress. I checked the picture she posted (the same one that you have) against a copy of the print edition of Newsweek. The images of the apple are completely different. For example, the reflections which make up the "cheeks" are completely absent on the print edition. I don't know much bout digitizing images, but I think that the picture which has been circulating around the Internet is a photoshop. Andy · March 21, 2010 12:34 AM And here I thought it was me. John Brown · March 21, 2010 12:34 AM I haven't seen the print magazine, but if it does look different, it could easily be a result of pixillation... But that doesn't let Newsweek off the hook, so to speak. The shadows are quite evident and the webedition workers - from the original graphics person to the editor - saw it and let it go. For giggles, most likely, but it was (IMO) deliberate. Personally, I'm not a fan of Michelle Obama. During the campaign I saw someone who is far more problematic than her husband. But I will give her credit that she is, so far, conducting herself according to First Lady protocol, even if the faux fawning of the media that she is the new Jackie O and a Fashion Icon for the ages is gag-worthy. Darleen · March 21, 2010 11:28 AM It's Garth Hudson. Kenneth Greenlee · March 21, 2010 02:17 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
March 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
March 2010
February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
An "elderly white man" who sounds just like an anonymous commenter....
Hell hath no fury like real people scorned Taking another bite at the Marxist apple Intercoms, Wal-Mart, and rope. (Some assembly required.) How big is the Joe Arpaio tent? "I will never vote for a Democrat again" Liberating Joe Biden's inner voice "You know we're going to control the insurance companies" Get It Legal Tour We Will Keep Stealing
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Or, maybe it's God from Monty Python and the Holy Grail . . .