Sometimes, nothing is something to worry about

After reading various reactions of doctors and other health care providers who submitted posts to the Grand Rounds special post-healthcare reform edition that Glenn linked earlier, I'm worried about what might happen over the next two years. I think everyone who opposed Obamacare should be worried too.

From a partisan political standpoint, the worst thing that could happen would be nothing.

As several medical bloggers who have analyzed this pointed out, what is being put in place is not health care reform, but health insurance reform. As my congressman (John Dingell) put it, it's a framework:

"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."
And just as it took time to get the bill passed, will take time to implement the framework.

First comes the health care insurance industry, and then the health care system itself. By the bill's own terms, this will take years.

The Democrats are not suicidal, and I think it is highly unlikely that they will even come close to implementation stage of their real goal any time soon. A nightmarish goal it is, but ordinary people probably won't see it happening between now and the elections. If the Democrats have sense, they will make sure that nothing happens that will adversely affect ordinary people in the near future. That will play right into their hands, because they'll be able to sit back and say, "the Republicans told you the sky was falling, and look! Everything is under control."

And because this is a highly political, highly partisan issue, many people on the right (myself included) did in fact shriek loudly and frequently about how this would mean the end of the best health care system known to man, etc. Which it will, but the point is, the stuff that will hurt people won't happen right away.

So the Democrats will do everything possible to make the Republican look like a bunch of hysterical whining ninnies, like a bunch of little boys who cried wolf. And see, the big bad wolf never came!

The lesson is that if you say the sky is falling and it doesn't fall, you have a bit of a problem. I hate to sound like a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, but if we see the Pelosi bill as providing the legal framework for the destruction of the health insurance industry (and as we all know, health care is hopelessly dependent on health insurance), then it's like placing demolition charges in a building with timers set to go off at whatever point is deemed "optimal." The building would still look fine and be fine, even if its fate is sealed.

If you don't like that image, another way to look at it is like a fence. First come the post holes, followed by posts planted in the ground. People can still come and go. The one day, the fence is up. But it will be too late! As Sonny in A Bronx Tale told the bikers after he locked the doors.

"Now yous can't leave!"
So I guess I'm worried about nothing.

posted by Eric on 03.30.10 at 04:31 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/9531






Comments

Something is already happening:

http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2010/03/senate_operatio.html

ATT, Caterpillar, and other companies are already having to do write downs and possibly as a consequence dump retirees from their drug benefit plan.

M. Simon   ·  March 30, 2010 06:38 PM

Speed the day when we get even a second rate healthcare system in this country. As it is, we rank something like 38th. All the Western European countries kick our ass in this regard.

So what's up with you right-wingers? Are you shooting to make us 50th or even 60th? Or will you only be happy when our healthcare system resembles that of Zimbabwe, with only a few plutocrats having access to healthcare?

Letting markets control healthcare is insane. It just allows cheaters to profiteer.

And what you're espousing are hardly classical values. The Greeks and Romans had enough sense not to trust unregulated markets. Oh, and they thought profit was theft.

Anonymous   ·  March 30, 2010 11:28 PM

Get back to us when you have some numbers better than "something like", and some methodology behind them. And a pseudonym. Anonymous is just fucking lazy. Like your "statistics."

Please trot them by again, because we've treated those idiotic WHO studies like the Globetrotters treat the Washington Generals.

Phelps   ·  March 31, 2010 06:14 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


March 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits