Any method for doing anything that cannot be sustained for 100 billion years minimum is unsustainable. Nothing is sustainable in the long term. So why not just focus on getting by with an eye towards future requirements?
And let me add that the things people were doing 200 years ago were unsustainable. And 200 years hence?
My definition of sustainable? Can we keep it up for about 100 years? Which is time enough to figure out what to do next.
Which was brought up by a discussion of the Bloom Box fuel cell and water heater.
Now if you want to get more into the technology of the Bloom Box here are a couple of very pricey books that may help:
My Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary was published in 1973.
The word "sustainability" does not exist in this authoritative tome.
Could be somebody was just makin' stuff up?
.