|
January 21, 2010
Not by PC alone!
This is an ominous development, and I don't think it's being widely reported: WASHINGTON - Ex-cons who converted to Islam in New York and other state prison systems have turned up in Yemen as Al Qaeda terror recruits, a new Senate report says.Via China Confidential, who says the report raises an additional taboo topic: The report highlights another taboo topic for Islamist-appeasing liberals: decades of infiltration of U.S. prisons by agents of Saudi Wahhabism--Muslim chaplains trained in and certified by Saudi-supported Wahhabi institutes operating in the U.S.Why is all of this considered "taboo"? It's easy to blame political correctness, but I don't think that fully explains the reluctance on the part of so many -- in journalism, government, and law enforcement -- to discuss the problem. It is unreasonable to assume that the entire machinery of official information has been paralyzed solely by political correctness. I think that there are different mindsets at work which operate in collusion. Above all, there's the national security, "we know what's best" mindset, which I've touched on before, and which for various reasons wants to keep citizens out of the loop. (A major reason for this is that they don't want to reveal sources and techniques, etc.) Then there's what I would call the "responsible" class -- people in various positions which have convinced them that either they are in charge or else they should be -- and these people sincerely believe that putting out information such as the above would "cause a panic" and is therefore "irresponsible." An interesting proposition, to be sure. I tend to look for answers, for facts, in order to get some idea of what is going on. You know, that old-fashioned concept called "the truth"? I would hate to think that truth-seeking behavior is irresponsible, but in fairness, greater minds than mine (such as Churchill) did allow that truth is the first casualty in war. To which I would counter "Fine, but are we at war?" If so, should I just shut up? This raises, of course, the additional problem of Saudi Arabia. If we are at war, they really ought to be our enemy, for they are the chief supplier not only of the lethal Wahhabist ideology that sees us as deserving death, but the money that fuels it. Which means we all are fueling it, because we buy their damnable oil. It's tough fighting an enemy that's an ally, especially an enemy we fund every time we fill up at the pump. Finally, there are those in power who simply don't want to look bad. They hate to look incompetent, they hate having people read about their shortcomings, and they hate being laughed at. If too many Americans read about converted Americans seeking to be suicide bombers in Yemen, they might think our government officials are incompetent, or worse. So the people who might look bad would naturally be expected to have a strong interest in suppressing such reports to the extent they can. None of this is to diminish the powerful role of political correctness in this process, but it would be a mistake to assume that it's the only factor. posted by Eric on 01.21.10 at 11:56 AM
Comments
The door was opened to religious proselytizing in prisons by people like Chuck Colson. You do remember him? The Nixon hatchet man who was jailed for obstruction of justice after the Watergate mess, a friend of G. Gordon Liddy, he found redemption and became a born-againer committed to prison reform. His Prison Fellowship Ministries was rewarded by George Bush with a presidential medal. As an influential member of The Fellowship, his latest political push was opposing Prop 8 in California, on purely religious grounds, of course. Frank · January 21, 2010 10:42 PM Oops! Frank · January 21, 2010 10:52 PM Prop 8? Isn't that a bit afield? I thought this post was about potential suicide bombers. how can you keep Muslims out when you let Evangelicals in? I wouldn't keep Muslims out; only Muslims who approve of religious suicide. I'd also keep out fundamentalist Christians who approved of such things. Eric Scheie · January 22, 2010 12:54 AM Yeah, it seems to me that if you're gonna have prisoners find religion you should make sure that religion is one of the "be nice to your fellow man" ones. Veeshir · January 22, 2010 08:48 AM Ok, sorry about the off topic Prop 8 link to Colson - I couldn't resist. That's the trouble with things like Faith Based Initiatives - government that supposedly represents all the people, ends up taking the side of religion either through direct tax support, or allowing religious recruitment of a captive group, in this case prisoners. Frank · January 23, 2010 01:50 AM This is a minor point in the context of your post, but Churchill?? There are for authorship of that "truth is the first casualty" line, and neither was Churchill. Erwin · January 24, 2010 06:43 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"How do you do that?"
Pleistocene nostalgia for evolution's end times? A Disaster Of Biblical Proportions Take the bass line for a walk Free Speech Sleep deprived Northeastern federalist? Or "Communist in Republican Clothing"? Naked Dancing Girls Not Error - Fraud What Is Wrong With Massachusetts? Going Light?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It is unreasonable to assume that the entire machinery of official information has been paralyzed solely by political correctness.
Wherein Veeshir looks like a conspiracy nut.
The Saudis throw a lot of money around.
The revolving door between our gov't and Saudi "think tanks" is interesting.
Lots of our retired pols get money from the Saudis, presidential libraries for instance, they also work for "Consulting Firms" and it's both parties. I'm not discriminating.
When you have the powerful in Washington saying, "That's no big deal" it reinforces the PC bent our fine media and civil "servant" betters already have, they don't want to look all Sarah Palin or something, so they pretend it's not happening.
Saying unpopular truths is the rudest thing one can do in polite society.