|
January 21, 2010
It Is Official
NASA agrees with me on the nature of drug abuse. Initial low-level involvement with drugs may result from peer pressure, drug availability or other risk factors in an individual's social or family environment. Subsequent escalation to and maintenance of higher levels of drug use is likely to result from biological, psychological or psychiatric characteristics of the individual user. In some cases, vulnerability may be inherited in the form of heightened susceptibility to a certain type of drug. In most cases, however, escalation will be caused by psychological traits or psychiatric conditions, some of which may also be inherited.Note the bolded parts. I have blogged every one of those points well before they became common knowledge. Every single one. Just to give one example: food, sex, and exercise junkies: You can go through some of my other articles on the nature of addiction at Drug War Articles. Or look at my sidebar under "Drug War" or "Addiction" in the list of topics at Power and Control. Here is a book on the subject: The Science of Addiction: From Neurobiology to Treatment Here is what one reviewer said about the book: First, let me say that I am a doctor specializing in alcohol and drug studies and the author of over a hundred publications so I have a good perspective of science books, etc. In a sentence, Carl Erickson's book, The Science of Addiction is one of the best books ever published on the subject. Anyone in the field of addiction medicine (e.g., physicians, psychologists, drug/alcohol counselors) or with a personal or other professional interest in addiction will learn from this book. While a bit more advanced than Drugs The Brain and Behavior: The Pharmacology of Abuse and Dependence, by the same author, it is still very readable, fully referenced and current. Two thumbs up to Dr. Erickson.The question in my mind is: what is so special about illegal drug use/abuse? We don't go after alcoholics unless they are harming others. We certainly don't legally persecute food addicts. Exercise addicts? Not even on the radar. The one thing I can think of is that there is a LOT of money in the persecution of illegal drug users. Which reminds me of another book I can personally highly recommend. Drug Warriors and Their Prey: From Police Power to Police State I wrote a review of that book a while back: How To Put An End To Drug Users. Just in case you are interested in a preview of the contents. H/T Drug Policy Forum of Texas Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 01.21.10 at 11:02 AM
Comments
Gregory, When the evidence all points in one direction and NASA joins in I'd call it confirmation. Besides when arguing wit the government it is always helpful to have a government agency on your side. M. Simon · January 22, 2010 12:29 AM Well, to NASA's credit, they now admit that "no evidence of CO2 driven global warming in any of the US temp data" and there won't be for decades: http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/12532 There is an important distinction between addiction and dependence. Most pain patients can become physically dependent on opiates, for example, yet they are not addicted because when they taper off, they lack the mental compulsion to use. Anyone can be made physically dependent, but it takes an addict to become addicted. Eric Scheie · January 23, 2010 12:29 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
January 2010
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
January 2010
December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"How do you do that?"
Pleistocene nostalgia for evolution's end times? A Disaster Of Biblical Proportions Take the bass line for a walk Free Speech Sleep deprived Northeastern federalist? Or "Communist in Republican Clothing"? Naked Dancing Girls Not Error - Fraud What Is Wrong With Massachusetts? Going Light?
Links
Site Credits
|
|
NASA? You have a plethora of possible sources at your fingertips (as you demostrated above), and you choose NASA?
The same guys who have been hyping AGW for eons? That NASA?