|
December 01, 2009
Fish gender is confusing, and gender confusion is fishy!
I've been keeping aquarium fish for years, and I have long known that fish gender is nowhere near as starkly defined and inflexible as it is in higher animals. It has long been known that many species of fish can and do switch gender, sometimes routinely. The process is not well understood, though. Earlier Glenn Reynolds reminded me of this when he linked a piece with the provocative (some might even say "transphobic") title of Something in the Water Is Feminizing Male Fish. Are We Next? It's one thing to worry about pollutants in our freshwater supply. It's another to find out that all across the country, male fish swimming in some of that water are becoming "intersex," their male sex organs producing immature female eggs. Although the condition occurs naturally in some species, it shouldn't happen to black bass. But a new study shows that it is, and in numbers far greater than ever suspected. The phenomenon raises serious concerns about the pollution levels in our rivers and could threaten several species.Far be it from me to accuse the author of either being "transphobic" or capitalizing on other people's "transphobia." But if you Google "intersex fish" you will see innumerable scary articles that make the phenomenon appear new and dangerous, and above all, caused by human activities. This is highly speculative stuff, and I am seeing very few reminders of the fact that gender fluidity in fish (whether called "sex change" or "gender change" or whatever) is hardly a new phenomenon. The basics are discussed in "Hermaphroditic Fish Can be Two Sexes at One Time -- Fish Can Change Gender to Increase Their Reproductive Potential: Not all fish can change sex, but many can. In fact, the majority of reef fish will change gender at some point in their lives. These fish are considered hermaphroditic and such fish have a few options. Some fish are simultaneous hermaphrodites meaning they are both genders at the same time and could potentially mate with any other individual in their species. Other fish are sequential hermaphrodites and these fish change sex at some point in their lives. Protandry is when a male becomes a female and protogyny is when a female becomes a male. Some fish can change their gender more than once, going back and forth between genders.
This is complicated stuff, and I am no expert, but I think it's worth reminding people that the phenomenon is anything but new. From a 1984 New York Times piece titled SEX CHANGE IN FISH FOUND COMMON: Conversions from female to male are now known to occur in species belonging to at least 14 families, while conversions from male to female are known in eight families.And in 2003 gender-change was described in black sea bass -- not as something that "shouldn't happen," but as a routine "phase of life." Gender-change is just a phase in life for the black sea bass. They are born in the wild as females, and when they reach about 2-5 years of age, they change to a male. Black sea bass in captivity can change their gender much faster than those in the wild. This is causing a problem for the fish breeder in commercial fishing industry.(More here.) I realize that black sea bass are not the same as black fresh water bass, but still, I'm confused. It seems to me that as a threshold question, people ought to be asking exactly how abnormal this is. My worry is that because "intersex fish" sounds scary, people might simply be assuming that something is very wrong and that therefore, "we" did it. The concern over intersex fish is not new, except that in 2003 the culprit was said to be cattle hormones used in feedlots. Now it's pee from women using birth control pills. I'm not saying that hormones in the water aren't messing with the fish, for how could I hope to prove such a thing? But shouldn't the people who are pointing to humans as the culprit have to prove something beyond the assertion of a correlation? I hate to sound like a parent in denial, but what if the fish are just going through a phase? MORE: From the abstract of "Widespread occurrence of intersex in black basses (Micropterus spp.) from U.S. rivers, 1995-2004": Intersex was not found in largemouth bass older than five years and was most common in 1-3-year-old male largemouth bass. The cause(s) of intersex in these species is also unknown, and it remains to be determined whether the intersex we observed in largemouth and smallmouth bass developed during sex differentiation in early life stages, during exposure to environmental factors during adult life stages, or both.How is it that the cause was unknown then, but so widely suspected now? posted by Eric on 12.01.09 at 04:27 PM
Comments
Geez, it's like you haven't been watching the global worming deal. "Science" only makes money when WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!, merely saying, "Yeah, fish change sex. We're not sure why" is a recipe for no grants. Nothing happened in the past. All knowledge is only 8 or fewer years old. That's one of my pet peeves, "studies" are proving stuff we already knew and "scientists" always seem surprised. Veeshir · December 2, 2009 08:58 AM If it has to do with sex anything other than the missionary position is abnormal. And what is with the fish and early Christianity? Maybe missionaries ought to start screwing like fish. M. Simon · December 2, 2009 10:35 AM may I pick a nit? gender and sex are not synonymous so fish do not have gender but they have a sex (and sex). I don't know when this use of "gender" when "sex" is the proper term came into use - and sometimes I think it's political - but it is jarring. Darleen · December 2, 2009 08:44 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
December 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
December 2009
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Cracking down on cowards who avoid having their lives saved
Something Is Rotten In Denmark Fish gender is confusing, and gender confusion is fishy! ITER Back To The Drawing Board Where's my Christmas stimulus? What To Do? Hopelessness is happier! And cheaper! The importance of avoiding the unimportant ClimateGate Charges Investigated Government Is A Criminal Enterprise
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I used to breed Betta splendens, Siamese Fighting Fish. Early on, I discovered that I could 'select for gender' by changing the pH and temperature of the water in which they hatched. It's been nearly 40 years, so I don't recall the exact parameters, but generally, warmer water and higher pH led to all-female broods, and vice versa.
Might changes in the physics and chemistry of the sampled waters be at play here?
And yes, many fish not only change gender, but change it back and forth at various ages, population densities, and in response to other environmental pressures. Wrasses and sea bass (e.g., groupers) can flip the sexual identity switch seemingly at will.