|
November 10, 2009
No one is accountable. And nothing is anyone's fault!
Speaking of police accountability, check this out (from the Wiki entry for Jeffrey Dahmer): In the early morning hours of May 30, 1991, 14-year-old Konerak Sinthasomphone (by chance, the younger brother of the boy whom Dahmer had molested) was discovered on the street, wandering naked, heavily under the influence of drugs and bleeding from his rectum. Two young women from the neighborhood found the dazed boy and called 911. Dahmer chased his victim down and tried to take him away, but the women stopped him.[29] Dahmer told police that Sinthasomphone was his 19-year-old boyfriend, and that they had an argument while drinking. Against the protests of the two women who had called 911, police turned him over to Dahmer. They later reported smelling a strange scent while inside Dahmer's apartment, but did not investigate it. The smell was the body of Tony Hughes, Dahmer's previous victim, decomposing in the bedroom. The two policemen failed to run a background check that would have revealed that Dahmer was a convicted child molester still under probation.[30] The officers laughed about the incident, one joking that his partner was "going to get deloused."[31] Later that night, Dahmer killed and dismembered Sinthasomphone, keeping his skull as a souvenir.I hate it when outrageous stories in Wiki are correct, but unless people are making up wild tales, it's true. John Balcerzak is in fact the president of the Milwaukee Police Association, and a movement to recall him failed 312-397. On the bright side, it's reassuring to know that 312 Milwaukee officers have enough of a sense of decency that they don't want as their president a guy who bragged about "reuniting" Dahmer with his victim.* Just goes to show you, it's hard to discipline people these days. Not even Bush and Ashcroft could fire the government employees who gave visas to Mohammad Atta and company. And if President Bush couldn't fire government employees, that means I couldn't do it either, not even if I had real power. So.... if I couldn't remedy the problems of which I complain, perhaps I shouldn't sit in judgment of those who can't. Democracy is humbling. And disillusioning. *It may not have been his fault. And the issuance of visas to Atta and company might not have been the fault of the people who issued them. And what about the failure of the Army to discharge Major Hasan? MORE: Just for tonight, may I please at least be allowed to sit in judgment of those who apparently think that complaints about "homophobic statements" have any place in the discussion of the torture murder of a fourteen year old boy? This trivializes something absolutely horrific.... Whatever "homophobia" the officers may have engaged in pales in comparison to the monstrousness of the underlying crime. Political correctness does function as a diversion, doesn't it? posted by Eric on 11.10.09 at 09:44 PM
Comments
Like I posted yesterday, the web has abundant stories of bad cops and DAs. via instapundit. As he wrote: WHAT THE FBI WAS DOING INSTEAD OF STOPPING NIDAL HASSAN: http://reason.com/blog/2009/11/10/mississippi-cardiologist-wont
hoss · November 11, 2009 09:18 AM Following the law was not the problem. They were fired for utterly failing in their duty. Even 2 strange women knew something was horribly wrong, and did a better job tyring to protect that kid, than 2 police officers who supposedly are good at reading people and seeing through lies. Dahmer's lies didn't work on those women. If they officers gave a crap, they would hav asked more questions, they would not have smelled a dead body then walked away. Who knows what motivated one of the worst cases of negligence ever, but surely cops that bad should not be cops. They should go do something that does not require investigation or decison making. plutosdad · November 11, 2009 12:28 PM Oops sorry john got the 2 mixed up. Actually they gave visas AFTER 9/11. That was what got them in trouble. That was the sorry state of affairs. plutosdad · November 11, 2009 12:32 PM I heard from someone else this evening the details of the cleveland case (the bloody woman screaming for help) and thought of this immediately. Midwest city, outrageously indifferent police officers, an incredible stink and basically the whole neighborhood knows something horrible is amiss with each of the guys. If I didn't know better, I might think certain entities were actually working to keep these psychopaths in business, so to speak. The fractal nature of evil revealing itself, in sloppy repetition with cosmetic changes. What are we to make of this in view of the fact that the officers in the dahmer case were later rehired, and the chief in the current case is "confident" his underlings acted properly? Further to that, the fri noticia dump dump provided all kinds of goodies re hood. someone up high defdept knew about communications to known alqaida and $ xfers to or from paki. unnamed peep decided not to conduct any interviews with anyone that either worked under, along side, or above, the curious major who had been extremely vocal in his desire to leave the army entirely, in addition to espousal of violence against us peeps and soldiers. Why was a nutjob like that [i]not[/i] allowed to leave? Who in their right mind could look at what was known and not at least make inquiries or just boot the guy out, as he wanted? They will tale it is, take your pic;, bumbling, miscommunication, chinese (egyptian-sumerian?) walls, agency competition, lack of imagination (only they mean yours), and anything else they can throw. Why for, all this po po state and surveylance? can we get a refund since it dont work? ^WizeUp · November 14, 2009 10:25 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
November 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
November 2009
October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The importance of being vicious
Cheaper And Easier To Find Dual Loyalties Major Hasan feeds the campaign to disarm America Treatment Denied Huckabee's unfair double standard in shoe-shopping! Obama Rejects All Options On Afghanistan, Demands New Plan Too many heresies! All Abortion All The Time Matters Of Faith
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Why would consular officers be fired for following the law in force at the time? Congress wrote the regulations concerning the issuance of visas. Those laws were followed--each an every officer who issued a visa to the 9/11 killers was hauled before Congress to defend his/her granting of the visas.