|
October 30, 2009
In order to reduce carbon emissions, we'll have to increase them!
Great news! According to a Princeton University study, if we take greenhouse gas emissions arguments seriously, the implementation of cap-and-trade will have precisely the opposite effect that it's intended to have. Carbon reduction laws encourage widespread deforestation as trees and other vegetation are harvested to produce energy from biomass to replace oil and gas. The problem is that in long run, this process actually increases greenhouse gas emissions, which cap-and-trade is meant to reduce, according to Searchinger.But will this faze Boxer, Kerry, and company? Hell no! The goal is not really to decrease greenhouse emissions, but to take control of the economy. Cap-and-trade is also unconstitutional, but then, so is federalizing heath care, regulating wood, federalizing hate crimes, and most of the legislation they're passing these days. posted by Eric on 10.30.09 at 04:57 PM
Comments
The "leaders" of the global warmmongering community are uninterested in global worming. They want power, politicians mostly. They want money, Gorequemada for instance. They are anti-technology and their goal is to reduce, if not eliminate, man's footprint on the Earth. The followers, the people who vote for them, mostly really think they're trying to save the planet. I've heard more than one pine for a time when man lived in harmony with nature. When I tell them the only time like that there were only two people on the Earth (Adam and Eve), they don't like that. Veeshir · October 30, 2009 05:39 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2009
September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
In The Future, Every War Will Be Vietnam For 15 Minutes
In order to reduce carbon emissions, we'll have to increase them! Theocons vs Communists Palin Calls For Hoffman - GOP Folds That Which Is Not Seen Capitalizing on personal destruction As RINOs and Social conservatives battle over the future Church And State Where Does The Oil Come From? "Respected Imam" killed in FBI shootout
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Just skimmed your post on wood. I think we need to bring back congressional effigies as a form of protest. You can tar and feather an effigy, or hang it by the waist from a liberty pole....
Yours,
Tom DeGisi