|
September 21, 2009
Government medicine at the State Fair
Let's see if I can get this straight. A killer (acquitted by reason of insanity in the 1987 slaying of an elderly woman whose body he soaked in gasoline to throw off search dogs) who has been declared criminally insane, with a history of escape, was taken on a "field trip" to the Washington State Fair, whereupon -- guess what? He escaped, duh! (Video here.) While the nurses at the hospital had warned against letting such risky patients go on public outings, in recent years, "the types of patients allowed to participate in the outings has become more inclusive." (Inclusivity, as many of us have been forced to learn, is an important government concept. A friend who is a public school teacher told me that many staff meetings are devoted to the constant need for its implementation.) So, the trip was allowed despite the murder of the elderly woman*, despite his previous escape (during which he "attacked a sheriff's deputy in the jail booking area, knocking him unconscious"), and despite a recent ruling that he was a threat to the public: A Yakima County judge had ruled two weeks ago that Paul remained a threat to the public because of his aggressive behavior and his decreased awareness of his psychosis, The Spokesman-Review reported Saturday.Davis is of course a union rep, and naturally the union's primary concern is worker safety. (It would not surprise me if the union agreement enables them to take evasive action and if necessary run away for their own safety in the event one of these patients gets violent, the public be damned.) But I don't mean to knock the union workers assigned to watch him, for at least they did report the escape immediately. Their "administrators," however, "waited nearly two hours before calling law enforcement." Naturally, this delay "gave Paul plenty of time to disappear." He was finally caught, but don't worry! There's now tough talk from government bureaucrats, one of whom went so far as to actually call the situation "unacceptable." "He is in a bad mental state," his brother, Tom Paul, told The Associated Press. "Why would they load him on a bus and take him to a fair?"Um, sorry, but the issue isn't field trips per se; it's taking dangerous murderers with previous escape histories on them. I have no problem with busing a group of severely depressed patients out to the countryside, and I don't think most reasonable people would. Is there no common sense? Or is the problem that common sense and bureaucracy do not mix? That's the larger issue here, because remember, this is a government run hospital. If despite all their funding and employees and committees and meetings they can't figure out that a dangerous murderer with an escape history shouldn't be going to the State Fair, how can they be relied on to make tough decisions about whether your gall bladder should be cut out? Or whether your child's leg really does need to be amputated? Or which doctor is best qualified to do it? I find it unacceptable, for example, to read that routine gall bladder surgery led to the amputation of an air force veteran's legs. By the way, the story of how the airman lost his legs is a classic example of government ineptness, and because this is about government medicine, I don't think it's off topic. The gruesome details were reported in a link sent to me in an email over the summer, and while I didn't write a post at the time, I didn't forget. It's a chilling story, but worth reading: ...A resident had punctured Read's aortic artery, which is near the gallbladder, with one of four ports that had been inserted into his abdomen. The resident hadn't even removed the gallbladder. The resident and the chief surgeon, Maj. Kullada Pichakron, who was observing, raced to clamp his artery and sew it up in time to save his life. At 11 a.m., Pichakron brought Jessica Read into the operating room to explain that Read was alive but the artery was leaking. A vascular specialist was needed to properly repair the valve, but the specialist at David Grant had separated from the Air Force eight days earlier. The replacement wasn't scheduled to arrive until Aug. 5.Neither did the hospital administrators "feel the urgency" when the mental patient walked away at the State Fair. At least, they didn't feel enough urgency to bother to pick up the phone and call 911 for two hours. We are of course more horrified by a criminally insane killer escaping at the state fair, even though no one lost his legs and nearly died. Yet each horror story involved government medicine, and a lack of accountability. Whether we should be more horrified by one than the other is a good question. MORE: * Since he was found not guilty by reason of insanity, does that mean the woman was not murdered? I might be mistaken in the legal sense, but were she my mother, I'd probably be inclined to think of her as having been murdered anyway. But because of the legal finding, she was no more "murdered" than she would have been murdered by an escaped tiger which mauled her to death. So I stand self-corrected. posted by Eric on 09.21.09 at 09:59 AM
Comments
About Airman Colton - sounds like a veterinarian would have been better. I wouldn't let those Air Force doctors touch my dog, let alone me. Frank · September 21, 2009 05:39 PM Washington State also routinely releases rapists and child molesters considered dangerous by the experts and the bureaucrats. The worst are subject to some monitoring. Bleepless · September 21, 2009 09:03 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2009
August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Foolish truths
Death Panels By Proxy, Jail Time For The Uninsured If there's a "right" to health care, then what about the "right" to buy groceries? Extremist SEPTA photographer fesses up to terror plot He Helped Write A Book Ask not what the NEA can do for you... You Can't Cheat An Honest Man "he figured he could get away with it" Bring It On She Is Bright - They Are Stuck On Stupid
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I've always wondered if the dr.s who claim a person is "cured" would be willing to take the responsiblity for the actions of said person.