|
August 28, 2009
Spare the boycott and spoil the backlash!
In light of M. Simon's earlier post, I thought a brief word about Glenn Beck would be in order. As Simon points out, "some folks are unhappy with Glenn Beck and want advertisers to boycott his show."I don't like Glenn Beck, and I don't watch the show. While I agree with a lot of what he says, his shrill yahoo style annoys me. To each his own, though. To be fair, I should point out that I even have trouble watching people on television when I agree with them, because not only is the presentation usually annoying to my senses, but I HATE commercials, and when one comes on I have to hit the mute button or change the channel, and at that point my patience to watch whatever I was watching is gone, and I have no interest in either switching back or "keeping track" of the timing of the commercial to unmute the sound. So I never watch Glenn Beck unless it's purely by accident flipping through the channels (and then only briefly). That said, I find it most annoying to be told not to watch him, as it's no one's business but my own what I watch or don't watch. What's really horrifies me about the Glenn Beck boycott is that the group which is spearheading it -- Color of Change -- is directly tied to the White House: Van Jones, who the Los Angeles Times describes as "a White House environmental advisor and co-founder of an African American political advocacy group that organized an advertising boycott of his program."Via Glenn Reynolds (whose commercial-free InstaVision I do watch, BTW.) So what do you do if you don't like a show but you don't like the boycott? Boycott the boycott? How? I'm not about to spend my time searching out Beck's former advertisers who canceled and not buying from them. I probably don't buy their stuff anyway, and unless I sat down and wrote letters in protest they'd never know (and I'm not going to do that either), so any boycott of the boycott would be lame and ineffective. And sending money to Glenn Beck strikes me as even more ridiculous; as it is I can't afford to support causes and people I do like. Hence the blogpost. Besides, if this White House-assisted boycott is actually helping Glenn Beck, why should I stand in its way? It deserves my sincerest efforts at ridicule. posted by Eric on 08.28.09 at 10:45 AM |
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The torch is
Spare the boycott and spoil the backlash! How Is That Boycott Coming? Red Ted This is government, right? Mind-Blowing Chutzpah, Or Mind-Boggling Lack Of Self-Awareness? What's In A Name Happy birthday, Glenn Reynolds! (You're in good company...) Win One For Mary Jo Heather has THREE mommies!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
You accused Color of Change of being engaged in "spearheading."
You said "spear." Racist.
Sadly, there really truly are people who think like that.