|
August 24, 2009
"pour in gunk to make the system lock up then gun the motor until it seizes"
Watching this video of the execution of an innocent Volvo (which I had to force myself to do) made me feel a combination of emotions. Sadness (yes, I'm not alone there), because even though I've never been a Volvo driver (I can remember howling with laughter when I saw George Carlin ridicule them as "safe cars"), this was obviously a perfectly good car. A lot of technology and human effort (to say nothing of raw materials) went into it, and someone could have used it. I might have bought it myself if it had been a good deal when I needed a used car. But thanks to some sadistic-minded, wasteful edict emanating from the "green" mentality currently in vogue with the new adminstration, these clueless functionaries at the bottom of the cash-for-clunker hierarchy get to have fun pouring a liquid glass, "killer app" mixture into the crankcase, to make absolutely sure that no one can ever use that engine again. So much for the idea of "recycling." The above is nothing less than an exercise in sheer waste. In a sinister twofer, it represents both a waste of resources, plus a deliberate trashing of a once proud car culture: "My most honest, most visceral response to Cash for Clunkers is sadness-sadness that old cars are being destroyed before their natural end. Older cars are rolling history. Chevrolet isn't making any more 1991 Chevrolet Caprices, for example. These cars are a non-renewable and, in my mind, precious resource."I have to admit, as I forced myself to watch the annoying video above, I felt anger, and even hatred for those who would deliberately implement a such a program. I see the destruction of that engine as symbolizing pure, naked, raw, disgusting abuse of power. I realize it will sound harsh, but I think that car was more useful than the useless bureaucrats who ordered its destruction. Here's the assessment of Brian Dunbar (at whose blog I found the video): Me, I'm driving a '97 Escort. I don't exactly like it but she runs well enough and my commute is short enough and I damn sure don't want a car payment.That's what they'd like to do to the rest of the economy. And what the more malevolent among them would like to do to many of us.... MORE: M. Simon reminded me of a video he linked, showing the destruction of an American car, an Oldsmobile to be exact. Not that the make and models are especially relevant (most cars are multinational these days), but the point is that they're spending taxpayer's money to destroy perfectly good cars. It's wastefully destructive, and bad economics. While I'm sure the bureaucrats would deny it, I can't help suspect that the anti "clunker" movement has at its core the belief that cars are bad. It reminds me a little of the movement to destroy guns. posted by Eric on 08.24.09 at 12:52 PM
Comments
Another cash for clunkers video: http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2009/08/cash_for_clunke.html Not a Vulva. OK. My spelling isn't the best. Or maybe it is intentional. M. Simon · August 24, 2009 04:08 PM So much for "reuse, recycle." HeatherRadish · August 25, 2009 12:22 PM Here is a video to make strong men (and women) weep: the cash-for-clunkers destruction of a Corvette, for crying out loud: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTYL-h5_hb4&feature=player_embedded lbphilly · August 25, 2009 04:45 PM Car destruction raises my Rand-fetishest hackles. Seize the engine, destroy the motive power of the world. Day by day she seems more prescient than ridiculous. I'm waiting for Pelosi to propose the Anti-Dog-eat-dog Act. Chris Hay · August 26, 2009 04:22 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A Reality Check In Iraq
Castro enters the fight against the "racist right" In retreat from science fiction Tips for travelers wishing to avoid loopholes At least as dangerous as rope A Few Words On Market Manias "pour in gunk to make the system lock up then gun the motor until it seizes" But for a villain, the culture might have been lost Carbon Market Frauds The Marijuana Option
Links
Site Credits
|
|
That whole deal ticked me off, destroying perfectly good cars because of their religion. You know they were hoping to get lots of older SUVs and pick-up trucks.
My prediction is that they'll find lots of fraud.
They've run out of money but all the dealers are complaining about not being paid for the cars they took in (and destroyed).
As for this
I might have bought it myself if it had been a good deal when I needed a used car.
Don't do it. Not unless you can afford it out of petty cash and don't mind car-payment levels of garage work costs.
I sold used cars on a Volvo lot for about 6 months. I made a lot of money a car, more than twice what I made selling used cars on a Honda lot.
Why? High end cars have greater mark-up on the used market.
Why did I go back to the Honda lot when I could make the same money selling half as many cars?
Because I got sick of selling what looked like a perfectly good used car for nearly $20K (This was 1993) and having it come back on a tow truck a week later.
European cars in general and Volvos in particular are very expensive to own.
In order to replace a broken dashboard switch like a fan rheostat (the plastic part, not the wiring or anything else), takes over 2 hours (at ridiculously high, European car shop mechanic rates) because you need to take the dashboard out to fix it.
You can always bring a Volvo back to life (which makes that clip even more egregious), but unless you're a mechanic, it's gonna cost.