New coincidences from Barry birther territory!

Via Dean Esmay, I found a hilarious post by Ace tearing WorldNetDaily a new one over the latest Birther "revelation." This time, it seems WND has learned that Barack Obama actually was born in Hawaii, only in 1957 instead of 1961.

The evidence? A typo on his MySpace time. Which is, um, his real birth-year of 1957; all other claims he was born in 1961 are faked. Or somethin'.

Which means he was now born in Hawaii -- now he's born in Hawaii, in this theory, not in Kenya-- but Hawaii wasn't a state then so he's not a citizen.

Incidentally, they don't say this would make him a non-citizen; they just imply it, by noting the state was just a territory at the time.

Of course anyone born in a US territory is a citizen, too. So this article hints at a new theory by which Obama is not a citizen whereas in fact it's a new, goofy new theory based on a typo that proves he is a citizen.

You've really given up all credibility and are now blatantly hit-whoring when you don't mention such an important fact, but imply -- and leave your readers to erroneously conclude -- that this would make him a non-citizen.

Ace has more, and it's very funny.

The only thing I'd add to this fascinating new theory is that in an utterly amazing coincidence, the Republicans' 1964 Republican presidential candidate was also born in a United States territory before it became a state.

AND he was also a United States senator.

AND, in an unbelievable coincidence, he was also called Barry!

But what would be even a more astounding coincidence (if only it were true), if we subject the numbers in their birthdates to a numerological analysis, both Barrys are threes.

Barry Obama: Born August 4, 1961 (8/01/1961)

8+4+1+9+6+1=29, and 2+9=12, and 1+2=3

Barry Goldwater: January 1, 1909 (1/1/1909)

1+1+1+9+0+9=21, and 2+1=3

Three!

Bingo!

If that doesn't prove Trilateral Bilderberger involvement, I don't know what does.

But alas! By setting back the Obama birthdate to 1957, WorldNetDaily's latest revelation has wreaked havoc with my numerological analysis, and forced me back to the drawing board, because if his new birthday is August 4, 1957, then,

8+4+1+9+5+7=34, and 3+4=7

Seven.

How discouraging!

But perhaps I'm missing something. If some of the more enlightened readers can decode the new hidden meaning, I'm all ears.

MORE: As M. Simon pointed out, my math is wrong. Obama is a 2. (Unless WND is right about his 1957 birth, in which case he's a 7.)

But surely, there has to be a Bilderberger Trilateral connection somewhere..... Maybe the Illuminati.

AND MOREL Barack Obama has appointed many Bilderbergers and Trilaterals to the top 14 spots in his inner circle!

Here's a breakdown:

Of Barack Obama's 14 top cabinet selections, 9 of them are affiliated with the Bilderberg group, 10 of them are affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations and 5 of them are affiliated with the Trilateral Commission

14 top jobs to Bilderberg/CFR/Trilaterals.

That's 2 times 7.

He's obviously using the power of both of his birth years for synergistic effect!

Case closed.

posted by Eric on 08.23.09 at 12:37 PM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/8688






Comments

You might want to check your math. Or is that part of the joke?

M. Simon   ·  August 23, 2009 07:55 PM

I guess Barry O is a 2, isn't he?

Maybe he is better off as a seven!

Eric Scheie   ·  August 23, 2009 08:22 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


August 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail



Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives



Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits