|
August 11, 2009
missing the good old dots
I've seen a lot of twisted logic in the health care debate, and it especially annoyed me to see opposition to government health care being attributed to racism. I well remember during the 1993 debate over Hillarycare (to which I was adamently opposed), there were a lot of the usual insults, imprecations, and the impugning of motives hurled back and forth, but I don't remember anyone being charged with sexism for opposing Hillarycare. It would have been laughable -- even by the standards of the left. Obviously, leftist "standards" have changed since 1993, but that does not explain in logic how opposition to government health care is racist. Has there possibly been a deterioration in basic logic since 1993? I realize that certain people have a way of "connecting dots" which aren't there, to their favorite causes which always are, but that's traditionally been the province of conspiracy theory thinking. (Black babies had AIDS. Doctors were Jewish. Jewish doctors gave them AIDS. Etc.) What made me laugh out loud was an attempt by the former president of Columbia attempt to link health care reform to the war on drugs. The former president of Colombia laid out Mexico's crisis to me in an interview this spring in Brazil: "Drug usage is unstoppable [in the United States] and the cartels have coyotes [people smugglers] planting on the streets hundreds of thousands of illegals selling drugs. The U. S. consumption has stayed level, despite huge costs and the jailing of millions of people."OK, I'm with him so far. And I agree with him about about getting rid of the Drug War. But look at what he says in the same sentence: He said the Americans must recant, and abandon, their drug prohibition policies and adopt European or Canadian-style health care to deal with the problem. Because they have not, Mexico runs the risk of being devastated as was Colombia.Since when does "European or Canadian-style health care" constitute an end to drug prohibition? The last time I looked, not only were all drugs illegal in both Europe and Canada, but they're still throwing marijuana offenders in jail. In most European countries, marijuana is still "in the same category as heroin or other hard drugs." Of course, anything might be in a 1000 page law that no one has read, so I don't want to be hasty. Tell you what. If the congressional health care bill legalizes all drugs, I'll at least partially reconsider my opposition to it. Maybe I'll call my congressman and ask whether he could reintroduce the drug relegalization provisions as a separate bill. Except, well, I strongly suspect that such provisions simply do not exist. Alas! Sometimes the whole world seems like a vast conspiracy of missing dots. They're everywhere, and it's so hard to fight them. They can't be seen, and they can't be caught! And the worst thing about them is that if you say they're not there, you're in denial! posted by Eric on 08.11.09 at 10:59 AM
Comments
A dot missed? (Not saying by whom.) Let us say, just for a moment, that Health Care "Reform"[1] and the War on Drugs are linked. Given that the "War on {fill-in-the-blank)" has been a dismal failure to all except those that sell military equipment and paraphernalia to "civilian" "police" troops (and those that build and operate prisons), why would such linking be a good selling point? And why would a reasonable freedom-loving person buy it? [1] "Destruction and obliteration" would be more accurate, but I quibble. Larry Sheldon · August 11, 2009 12:13 PM Sorry about the dupes--I keep getting messages that say the posing attempt failed. I'll stop now--there may be more dupes in the pipe. Larry Sheldon · August 11, 2009 12:15 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
With the government in charge, who will prevent overprevention?
missing the good old dots A Middle Of The Night Visit From Thugs Hilarity at Daily Kos Manufactured Dissent Super duper diaper lesson An AP Story I have not yet begun to feel sore! AARP Members Unhappy American hostages spend night in captivity
Links
Site Credits
|
|
A dot missed? (Not saying by whom.)
Let us say, just for a moment, that Health Care "Reform"[1] and the War on Drugs are linked.
Given that the "War on {fill-in-the-blank)" has been a dismal failure to all except those that sell military equipment and paraphernalia to "civilian" "police" troops (and those that build and operate prisons), why would such linking be a good selling point?
And why would a reasonable freedom-loving person buy it?
[1] "Destruction and obliteration" would be more accurate, but I quibble.