|
August 27, 2009
Heather has THREE mommies!
Such a scenario will be possible in the near future. In light of news reports like this one, some people will be worrying that the "institution of reproduction" is under assault. Others will worry about whether that should that be the government's business. If you're willing to pay to utilize such advanced DNA techniques, by what right should the state be able to stop you? In a piece titled "The Bioethics of a Three-Parent Embryo," Wired interviews University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Jonathan Moreno about these issues, and he zeroes right in on possible political considerations: There are going to be a lot of techniques that offer people in gay couples the chance to reproduce in non-traditional ways. This is one possible pathway. We are going to be facing some very interesting social questions about how far this goes.My body, my blastomere? Or does it cease to be "mine"? Ethicists will haggle, but suppose all I want is a new liver? Suppose a guy and his wife want the DNA of himself, his wife, and all their best friends scrambled Mixmaster style to create a child with five or six parents and they all consent. Is that the business of others? If so, on what basis? Is it "conservative" to want the government kept out, or is that liberal? We're not in a good position to tell people how to have kids.Bioconservative? Yes, there is such a creature! Bioconservatives are individuals whom oppose human augmentation, whether cybernetic, genetic, or nanotechnological, as opposed to transhumanist whom advocate self-modification.I don't seem to have written about the phenomenon before, but I think I'm probably a bioliberal at heart. posted by Eric on 08.27.09 at 10:06 AM
Comments
The writer is confused. "Embryo" and "self-modification" are unrelated concepts. Being against embryonic experimentation and for the right to self-modification does not create an inconsistency. Bob Smith · August 27, 2009 01:22 PM To rely an on old quote: "It is scientist job to ask what can be done. It is the duty of society to determine what should be done." Just because we can doesn't mean we should. Maybe this isn't your "no way in Hell" product, but you have some limit. You would, for example, refuse to allow embryos to be raised in womb-tanks to be used as protein enhancements in dog food. If "whatever can be done" is OK, and left to everyone's individual devices to decide, how would you address that travesty? There are some limits on what people are "free" to do. We just disagree where we draw the line. My vote on this sort of stuff is "nope." Talk about taking a run at the cliff of the slippery slope! Mrs. du Toit · August 27, 2009 03:51 PM Imagine the custody hearing and child support dispute. Donna B. · August 27, 2009 05:04 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Happy birthday, Glenn Reynolds! (You're in good company...)
Win One For Mary Jo Heather has THREE mommies! Slogans like "Socialism or death" can be carried too far Inequality For a psychopath, hate is love, and race is a game Who says we don't have shock "treatment"? Was Saddam Really Working On A Bomb? A Reality Check In Iraq Castro enters the fight against the "racist right"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Things are getting interesting in that field. People's morals and ethics are going to be tested severely as we decide on stuff like "clones' rights" and whatnot.
I'm against creating life to experiment on it, but if you want to be "molded", I'm all fer it. And if you can produce a new liver out of some cells from my snot? Ah-choo.
I can't remember who wrote it, but I read a book about a future where they have bio-sculpting machines. There are no Drs, you get into the tank and come out "cured".
They also can "sculpt" you, as the name implies. So you can be 8 feet tall and purple, striped green and brown with no hair anywhere, you can have gills and webbed feet or......
Very interesting.