|
August 04, 2009
Having something to say versus finding something to say
In general, I prefer blogging when I have something to say about something, as opposed to when I have to find something to say about something. * That's because the former is more sincere, and less driven by a sense of "blogligation" than the latter, which in my case often takes the form of saying something about something that others are blogging about, lest I appear to be neglecting or not interested in the subject. For example, if fifty students were suddenly shot by some damned nutcase in another classroom, I'd have to say something -- even though I'd resent the hell out of that sense of having to. It's like, whose life is this? Why should the stuff we call news get to dictate my blogging agenda to me? It's as if other people -- even random events -- are telling me what I have to do, and I don't like it. However (and here's the catch), I have learned that the blessed people who actually read my stuff don't really care whether what I have to say is something I had to say, or found to say. Some seem to prefer the latter to the former. Perhaps this is because I care more about the former than the latter, and the less I care, the less I tend to be emotional, and the less I find myself struggling over, say, pointless nuances involving endless internal contradictions in my thinking. Philosophically none of this matters, because once I put whatever I put here, I then have it, and whether I was originally driven by having to say it -- or by the process of finding something to say something about -- becomes irrelevant. Likewise, whether I hate or love what I wrote (or hated or loved the process of writing it) has no relationship to what readers seem to like. That's because my tastes are not yours, and there is no accounting for taste. Anyway, I'm sure I am neglecting a lot of important issues right now, but whatever they are, you can be sure that someone, somewhere isn't! * It should go without saying that if the goal is blogging, having nothing to say is not an option. So if you have nothing to say, never say it! posted by Eric on 08.04.09 at 12:03 PM |
|
August 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Two Cows
Having something to say versus finding something to say Deliberate aquaculture leads to accidental horticulture Feeling The Heat Commercial Real Estate We need socialism now! (The details are unneccesary...) How the original Kenyan birth certificate came to be destroyed in the Twin Towers Trousers are indecent, and so is freedom Order A Pizza Today Honoring the natural born truth
Links
Site Credits
|
|
So in other words, you had something to say about having nothing say.
Or did you have nothing to say and just felt you had to say something?
Or have you been saving this post until you really had nothing to say?
This post raises more questions than it answers.
Including, did I comment here just because it had no comments?