|
|
|
July 13, 2009
High priced altruism, with zero deductible!
One of my objections to socialized medicine is that it would require people who don't abuse the system to pay for people who do. Like Ricky Alardo: Ricky Alardo, a homeless alcoholic nicknamed Ricky Ricardo, swigs cheap vodka by day at his favorite corner in Washington Heights, then calls an ambulance to chauffeur him to the hospital for a free meal and a warm place to sleep, courtesy of taxpayers who fund his Medicaid benefits.There's more, and it's a classic example of what happens when people know that someone else is picking up the tab. People who pay their own way or have major-medical style policies with high deductibles simply aren't going to behave like that. But if the government takes everything over, there will be no incentive not to act like Ricky Alardo. And no way to opt out. It's easy to say that health care is a right. (As I explained in this post, I disagree, which along with a But what is health care? Free ambulance rides to the ER whenever someone has a sore throat? If I don't do things like that, I resent the hell out of having to pay for people who do, and I think a lot of others feel the same way. Once again, Are strangers entitled to more from me than I give myself? MORE: Using an outdated figure of speech above, I mistakenly suggested that a cup of coffee could be purchased for a quarter. (My bad.) posted by Eric on 07.13.09 at 06:41 PM
Comments
The insane are impossible to deal with inside a sane system. Perhaps our current system is insane? Yes... it is insane to treat them as if they were sane. Of course they need a bed and food. Why not make that available outside the ER? Is our legal system and array of inflexible laws preventing that? Or... are these men sane to get what they need by manipulating the system we've set up? Why not set up a system that accommodates them? If they can sleep on an ER cot... why not set up a ward of them they can be transferred to? Then those horribly uncomfortable ER cots can be put to good use and something better designed for ER patients with more treatable conditions. Donna B. · July 14, 2009 04:10 AM I think a better solution, Donna, would be to tell people "You're not sick. Go away." And if they persist, don't give them the free ride to the hospital. But that would get someone sued for malpractice or something. I'm moving to the moon. Loren Heal · July 14, 2009 08:54 AM The biggest problem is that people are assholes. Many (Most?) people, at a fundamental level, don't care about anybody but themselves. I understand I live in Narcissism, VA and near Ego-centric, MD (the Greater DC metropolitcan region), but you see it everywhere. So no matter what "helping" system you devise, there will be people who will abuse it. The only good thing about the current fall of civilization (besides its hilarity) will be all these iceholes "demanding their rights" after the fall and the stunned looks as they realize that nobody cares about their precious selves. Veeshir · July 14, 2009 11:24 AM Loren, the insane are sick and really can't be told to just go away. An ER is not the place to daily deal with a chronic disease, but that doesn't mean they're not sick. Donna B. · July 14, 2009 07:55 PM are these men sane to get what they need by manipulating the system we've set up? Yes, it's called parasitism and it's a fairly common and very successful survival strategy. As long as the host survives and tolerates it... apotheosis · July 15, 2009 10:49 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
• If MADD has run out of things to do, I'd like to help!
• Baby lies can be good! • The Marginal Cost Of Life • India or China? • Free Health Care • Climate Models Are Not So Hot • Good news! From China! • Palin Climate Change • High priced altruism, with zero deductible! • If you don't like musical torture, you're a bigot!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I had some friends in grad school who grew up in the Soviet era. They once bought camping gear at Target, went camping with it, then returned it to the store. Their thinking was that if the store was foolish enough to have a liberal return policy, then they would be fools if they didn't take advantage of it. They said that's the way people thought back home.
I think that you may not only see more gaming of the system under GovCare, you may eventually see an acceptance of it as normal, with no stigma attached.
A quarter? Wow! Where is your coffee shop?