|
July 18, 2009
Advance Care Planning
I just read an interesting section of the proposed health care bill that refers to Advance Care Planning Consultation. Now what the h e double toothpicks is that? Go to page 425 and read a ways and you come to: 4 ''(E) An explanation by the practitioner of theTranslation: you will be encouraged to give it up (DNR - do not resuscitate) fur da grater god duvall. i.e. "you are going to die - would you care to speed things along?" And now you know where the cost savings will come from. No doubt Obama's Science Adviser John Holdren had some inputs on that section. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 07.18.09 at 07:02 PM
Comments
It is not the government's job to deal with my end of life issues. And I'm not interested in mandatory counseling every 5 years. And I'm not interested in being forced into any health care plan. M. Simon · July 18, 2009 10:31 PM I'm not going to read more than you've posted... as that's probably more than the people who are actually voting on it have personally read. But... while I understand that it is not the government's job to deal with anyone's end of life issues, I certainly think you have a responsibility to deal with them yourself. Mandatory counseling is never going to work for anything anytime anywhere... and I don't like being forced into anything any more than you do. BUT... if this is the worst you can come up with in the health care reform bill, I wouldn't be opposed to it. (Please note again that I didn't follow the link.) The main problem I have with the bill is the assumption that we have a health care crisis to begin with. Call me callous or whatever, I just don't see it. Donna B. · July 19, 2009 12:38 AM Donna, The deal is that it only starts there. What happens when the Powers decide that health care costs are going through the roof and cutting back on doctor's salaries is not enough? Old folks will be denied care based on government policy. Because you have no enforceable contract with the government. I dread the day - coming in months - when I will be FORCED into Medicare. Since I have no regular doctor my chances of getting one then will be slim and none. Fortunately I think this bill has little chance of passing. M. Simon · July 19, 2009 02:08 AM I read the first 100 pages and found the following: Exemption for unions (Sec 154). I stopped reading after that. There are at least 1000 pages in this thing. Gideon7 · July 19, 2009 03:50 AM More: HR 32000 mandates a punitive tax of 8% on small businesses with payrolls over Note that income or profitability aren't considered - just payroll. Gideon7 · July 19, 2009 04:43 AM My DH & I recently went to a meeting on Advance Care Planning at our (RC) church. The doctor/speaker is responsible for the local Hospice and is a palliative care specialist. We discussed issues the medical community must deal with when faced with a crisis where the actions they could take are not clear-cut, the patient does not have a written outline for his/her wishes and spouse or children aren't reachable... (happens all the time) This was a thoughtful presentation done within the context of our religious beliefs and was very helpful. Susan Lee Susan Lee · July 19, 2009 10:02 AM I work in long term care, and have worked in hospice care (much of which is currently covered under Medicare.) I also absolutely loathe Obamacare and it's backdoor attempt to create a single payer government controlled system of health care rationing. That said, what you cited is typical government speak, similar mandates already exist within the nursing home and hospice regulatory schema. But the opacity of the verbiage certainly doesn't help to dispel a layman's concerns. The real problem is that this is just the legislation and it wouldn't even matter if it sounded nice and benign. After enactment what follows is that some executive governmental body then takes that law and turns it into regulation - and that is where things go horribly awry. ThomasD · July 19, 2009 02:10 PM "Czar" is a misnomer for "Commissar." Brett · July 20, 2009 08:16 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
July 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
July 2009
June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
The Oligarchy Controlling Washington
It's The Regulations Stupid They Are Getting Nervous Some scientists hate your ice cream. Others hate your nuts. Advance Care Planning Sinking The Russian Fleet Longevity is a temporary distraction from death All signs point to an endless recovery! The Buchanan-Obama axis of karma "I don't think I made a mistake"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I read the section, but I can't say I see anything besides, at most, encouraging someone to think through and set down their 'druthers. Where does it say they're plumping for DNR? I've already been through the mill where, in the absence of such documentation, control essentially passed from the family to the hospital. If you don't have a living will yet, do your family a favor and get one.