|
June 29, 2009
No silence here!
Honduras. There. I just mentioned it. Wouldn't want some scold of a blog analyst to come along and ask why it is that only conservatives care about Honduras and where are the libertarians. But which side am I on? Why, the libertarian side, of course! I can't help notice that Hugo Chavez is threatening to intervene in Honduras's affairs, and a lot of countries (including Obamaland) are expressing concern that the removal of President Zelaya was illegal: The removal of Mr Zelaya has drawn criticism across Latin America and the wide world.Hmmm... Is there any way to support the Yankee empire in defiance of Chavez and Obama while still maintaining any shred of libertarian creds? I don't know, but I'd hate to be accused of silence. AFTERTHOUGHT: Lest I be misunderstood, I wrote this post to protest one of the things I most hate about blogging, and the blogosphere (if that term hasn't become outmoded....) For me, blogging is a spontaneous act, a labor of love, even. The problem is that if you discuss things like politics and international events, the score keepers come along tallying up points and positions, with the clear intent to influence you, or to "hold you accountable," and inject the noxious notion of obligation. They have a right to do that, of course, but I think it's despicable, as it interferes with free thinking, and thwarts the creative process. Whether stifling creativity is what they want to do, I don't know, but from time to time, I feel that I must object. Of course, there's a contradiction there, as I don't like feeling obligated to object -- not even when I am objecting to an unwanted sense of obligation. The problem is, scolds are often driven by the idea that they're doing something good, like the people who want to invade your house and castrate your dog while screwing in new lightbulbs. And if you don't say anything, they'll think you're another passive idiot awaiting their divinely guided intervention. No, no one has specifically asked me to blog about Honduras. It's just a news item which struck me as likely to fall into the blogligation category sooner or later, and I resent having my writing dictated by the whims of news items. Sometimes, the best defense is a good offense. MORE: My newsphobic resentment aside, I do think a good libertarian case can be made against supporting the the ousted president. People can read the details at Fausta's blog, via Glenn Reynolds. posted by Eric on 06.29.09 at 09:52 AM
Comments
Donald Sensing has a different perspective. Assuming he's right (as I trust he is, from experience), the Honduran military has a role much like that of the Turkish military; defending the Republic from civilian overreach. If half of what's said about their "President"'s re-election is true, there's no reason for a libertarian to oppose his deposition by the military and the resumption of actual democracy. Sigivald · June 29, 2009 03:09 PM Quick thoughts, facts and questions. 1) The President definitely was violating the law about referendum. 2) The Congress definitely could remove him. 3) Did the Constitution permit him to fire General Vasquez who defied him? The answer in the US would be "yes." In many nations it would be "no." 4) Does the Constitution allow the Supreme Court to order the President's arrest? Or the Attorney General to request it? Again, it isn't US law, it is another country. 5) I find no references to a Vice President being involved. But the Congress has appointed a new President, Micheletti. 6) Will the OAS give a hoot about what Honduran law says anyway? Or will they wing it based upon political considerations. It looks like politics at the OAS. Without detailed knowledge of the Honduran laws and constitution, and of the OAS, can we be sure of anything?
K · June 29, 2009 03:34 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2009
May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Overdosed on absolute relativism
No silence here! Neda Net EBAY ADMITS OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA! Something for nothing Iranian Says: Israelis Help Us Climate of Change The finest deficits money can buy Western colonialism comes in more than one flavor Understanding Before Voting
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Hard not to imagine that the driving force behind Pres. Obama speaking out in this case so much more forcefully, in support of a 'progressive/populist/leftist' president who wants to ignore constitutional prohibitions on an extention of his term, is that he is contemplating doing the same in 2016.