|
June 24, 2009
Black And Green
Via HotAir, Tom Friedman has a bold plan to end the theocratic state in Iran: put a $1 tax on U.S. gasoline! Sure, it will be a terrible burden on everyday Americans during the worst economic conditions in a generation, but surely the mullahs will embrace democratic reforms if they have slightly less money! Only exclamation marks can capture the enthusiastic absurdity of this international politics version of the broken windows fallacy! Friedman cites the collapse of the Soviet Union, but this is a very poor analogy for several reasons. First off, in Communist states where the leadership had the will to crack down (e.g. Cuba and N Korea) there was no change in power despite loss of Soviet funding. Second, a major reason the USSR collapsed was that nearly all its constituent nations had been militarily coerced into the Union and retained their own nationalist/ethnic pride: Ukrainians voted 10:1 for independence when given the chance (and you can't really blame them). Iran isn't homogenous, but it's not very likely to break up along ethnic lines either. Third, oil was only a minor factor in the overall economic devastation wrought by Communist ideology itself. The notion falling oil prices, and their effect on grain purchases, were the decisive factor ignores the fact they had to buy grain in the first place, due to 70 years of steadily worsening harvests. Iran's regime is dysfunctional, brutal, and increasingly illegitimate, but not Communist. And even were the Persian petro-economy to utterly collapse, which may happen anyway, it's not clear why anyone should expect that would lead to political change, given that the mullahs seem quite unwavering in their belief in their own holiness, and also quite willing to murder anyone who expresses a opinion otherwise. The most likely outcome has the mullahs cracking down even harder, and the country gradually starting to look more and more like Afghanistan under the Taliban (except with nukes; that should be fun!) Ultimately only two things reform militarized regimes like Iran's: moderation/capitulation from within, or military force from without. Don't bet on either happening anytime soon. posted by Dave on 06.24.09 at 08:56 PM |
|
June 2009
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2009
May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
A conspiracy of cultural illiteracy
Black And Green Saudi Underwear Revolution Reports From Iran Regime Change Iran Logo Banned It's high time we headed in the wrong direction? A single DDOS can ruin a mullah's entire day! Government Failure At last! Some spine! Don't take what he says literally
Links
Site Credits
|
|
It's policies such as this that belie the proggs' claims to be looking after the people. As Charles Murray has observed, if one really cares about the unsophisticated little guy, one attempts to make the the rules of citizenship simple, clear and easy to follow, and one doesn't deliberately drive up the costs of his goods and services.
That doesn't describe the proggs. Remember, when they loftily inform you that everyone seeks power, they are telling you nothing about their opponents, but they are telling you everything about themselves.