|
October 04, 2008
Who reports? Who decides? And who is undecided?
"They deserve to lose." So says Thomas Sowell about the unexplained Republican failure (so far) to present the facts. His piece is titled "Do facts matter?" and he's talking about these facts: Fact Number One: It was liberal Democrats, led by Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, who for years-- including the present year-- denied that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taking big risks that could lead to a financial crisis.Now, here is where I confess to a serious disadvantage -- one grounded in a major disconnect between mainstream media reality and blog reality. All of the above facts have been discussed in post after post at this blog, and in post after post at countless other blogs. So many times that I feel like a redundant bore repeating them. I repeat, for the umpteenth time, I hate being repetitive! How many times do I have to say that I cannot stand having to repeat myself? It is unoriginal and crass. Once I write about something, unless I have something new to say, repeating it feels like a degrading and meaningless chore. I say "meaningless" because I think readers of this blog already know what they think one way or another, and they are not going to be persuaded in the least by my repeating anything I have said. I suspect that most readers already know who they're voting for. But maybe I shouldn't be making such assumptions. Hmm.... This is as good a time as any for a reader poll. Not to find out who people are voting for, but simply to determine how many undecideds read this blog. So, if you could kindly take just a second and let me know how many of you are undecided, I'd appreciate it. I tried to create as broad a category as possible for the undecideds, so I am including people who might change their mind. I realize that this poll is not scientific, but it might at least give me some idea how many readers here are likely to be moved one way or the other by opinions, arguments, or facts. Sowell argues that facts only matter if people know about them, and that many people just plain don't. Facts don't matter much politically if they are not reported.He's got that right, because in the larger picture, it should not matter whether the Republicans deserve to lose. In that respect I think I'm both selfish and unselfish. Selfish because I think I will personally lose more freedom, and unselfish because I truly believe in my heart that if Obama wins, the country loses. I don't want to bias the above poll, but I don't think it will surprise any readers to hear that I'm not undecided. What I'm undecided about is whether that matters to anyone. posted by Eric on 10.04.08 at 10:48 AM
Comments
We conservatives (who tried to teach the Republican party a lesson in 2006, but apparently failed) never understand why the party won't publicize the outright dishonesty of the Democrats. It's just so frustrating to see issue after issue ignored. McCain has been in the "collegial" senate too long. It's why a Senator should NEVER be elected, they just don't get what leadership is. Our best hope is that Sarah continues to shine and comes back strong in 2012. She can do that if she gets on the trail for congressional replacements in 2010 and leads the party back to a majority in one or the other (or both) houses of congress. I do not expect the country to have a good two years with a Democrat congress (just witness the feckless and vicious nature of their running it the last two years), and the naive disaster that a 0bama presidency will foist upon us. Webrider · October 4, 2008 03:31 PM Fritz, I understand your point of view and I think it's not quite fair to decide on any particular vote in the Senate for either candidate. The deciding issue for me is who is going to do the least harm (or prevent the most harm) to the country. McCain wins hands down on that one.
Donna B. · October 4, 2008 06:32 PM "Sowell argues that facts only matter if people know about them, and that many people just plain don't." - Eric Sowell is mistaken. Facts only matter to people who care about facts, and those just don't form the majority of humans over the last several decades. Howdy Eric. Long time. ;) Ironbear · October 7, 2008 01:01 PM Thanks for the input. Hey Ironbear! Thanks for stopping by! :) Eric Scheie · October 7, 2008 03:03 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
October 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
October 2008
September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Bill Ayers Was Just A Guy In The Hood
So why bother with the debate? Some Interesting Friends You Have Senator "The Obama Youth"???? Money Following The Money Followers Frank-N-Fannie (a furtive subtext) riveting imageism tinged by double standards Ayers And Obama Care About Children Omaha Selections from the haystack
Links
Site Credits
|
|
McCain had one last chance to get my vote. He lost that chance by voting for the giveaway to Wall Street. I will be writing in Charles Jay for President, since even the Libertarian Party blew it this year. If McCain had stood up for the rest of us against this nonsense, he would have gotten my vote, no matter how much I object to many of his policies.
As far as Sowell's commentary -- yes, it was policies pushed for decades by liberal Democrats that led to the pile of lousy mortgages at the heart of the financial crisis. But it took a special kind of insanity, and this one is not the fault of liberal Democrats, to leverage and repackage those mortgages to the point that a smallish dip in valuations crashed major financial institutions.