|
September 23, 2008
An issue that should not be forgotten
Regular readers know that I am a Life Member of the NRA and a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. I've said that I could never vote for Barack Obama because of his socialistic background. (The ACORN connection especially worries me.) But aside from being one of the most socialistic politicians in America, Barack Obama is also one of the most vehemently anti-gun politicians, and for that reason alone, I could also never consider voting for him -- even if I believed his malarkey about how he supports the free market system. Like his running mate Joe Biden, Barack Obama is rated "F" by the NRA for numerous reasons, and that last link spells many of them out. In short, Obama-Biden constitute the most anti-gun ticket in United States history. Little wonder the NRA is running this ad: I'm glad they're running it. This is a major issue that neither the complex economic debate -- nor the relentless promotion of the "Vote for Obama or else you're a racist!" meme -- should be allowed to obscure. M. Simon sent me a link to some great NRA videos here. In this one, a veteran who fought for his country says he will never vote for a man who wants to take away his right to own a handgun:
And here's one revealing Joe Biden's appalling record :
How anyone who owns a gun (or who believes in the right to keep and bear arms) could even consider voting for the Democratic ticket is beyond me. posted by Eric on 09.23.08 at 11:54 AM
Comments
Slightly off topic, but the mention of "Slow" Joe Biden forces me to mention it. This is a quote which appears about 2 minutes into this CBS News interview of the Slow one by Katie Couric: “When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said, ‘look, here’s what happened’.” ... Stunningly stupid. Simply beyond words stupid. And, of course, Couric doesn't bat an eyelash at this display of ignorance. Here is the link: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4470093n (ht: dinocrat.com) boqueronman · September 23, 2008 03:11 PM John McCain's record on guns isn't great (I'm told GOA gave him an F- record, but that's GOA for you). But he's sure as hell better than Obama on them, and unfortunately there's no third choice that can actually win. (And the available third choices who can't win, well... I'm sure whoever's running Green is just as bad as Obama, and the LP's gone completely crazy.) Boqueronman: You're right, that is stunning. Though I'm not sure it's not stunning historical confusion rather than plain stupidity. (I'd give him a pass on "television" vs. "radio" as mere misspeaking, but the idea that FDR was President when the stock market crashed in '29 is the real problem...) Sigivald · September 23, 2008 03:40 PM "Factcheck.org" [sic] has been wrong a lot this election. The Obama quote that freaks me out is "I won't take your guns away. I don't have the votes in Congress." Not because it's unConstitutional--ffft, who cares?--but because people who believe in keeping people unarmed and dependent on the state for "protection" haven't reached critical mass in the House and Senate. Yet. Heather · September 23, 2008 03:49 PM I'm with Heather. That quote is very, very scary. Moreso, because it's probably one of the few times he's been completely truthful. The 2nd Amendment is the canary in the coal mine for me. Donna B. · September 23, 2008 09:44 PM I think he just lost the Pink Pistols and a good number of gun owning Dems. Way to go dude, metaphorically shooting yourself in the foot. I tell ya, the guy is destroying his campaign every time he opens his mouth. Blademonkey · September 24, 2008 01:30 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
September 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
September 2008
August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"The biggest story of the campaign"
"white privilege" defined "Disparate impact." A deadly remedy for a misdiagnosis Helping to bring about "change"? An issue that should not be forgotten Some Lovely Friends You Have Buddy Fanning the frames of flames Just say no! To Bush! Resurrection Thirty Missing Investigators
Links
Site Credits
|
|
BTW, FactCheck went hog wild on this mailer and Jim Geraghty effectively rebuts them.
Yet even then, in both links I provide, there was still no mention of Obama's great idea with the "5 mile radius" law or the fact the he openly said he supported the DC gun ban then supported the Supreme's finding in DC vs Heller; two irreconcilable positions. Not to mention that FactCheck consistently uses what Obama "says" as opposed to what Obama "does" for their "fact checking".
Am I the only one that thinks FactCheck has really changed during this election?