|
August 08, 2008
Touching
Super snooping technology is on the rise, as I just learned via an emailed link to a piece about "Desi" -- a new fingerprinting technology that can discern whatever you have touched: With a new analytical technique, a fingerprint can now reveal much more than the identity of a person. It can now also identify what the person has been touching: drugs, explosives or poisons, for example.It can probably reveal even more than that -- what you've eaten, who you've had sex with (and maybe what kind of sex....), whether you've handled weapons. In short, your entire, um, lifestyle. Writing in Friday's issue of the journal Science, R. Graham Cooks, a professor of chemistry at Purdue University, and his colleagues describe how a laboratory technique, mass spectrometry, could find a wider application in crime investigations.From a courtroom drama perspective, what's really cool about this is that not only does it find the incriminating evidence, but it shows the it neatly framed in a fingerprint: Because the spatial resolution is on the order of the width of a human hair, the Desi technique did not just detect the presence of, for instance, cocaine, but literally showed a pattern of cocaine in the shape of the fingerprint, leaving no doubt who had left the cocaine behind.Kewl! Fortunately, we live in a free country where the police would need a search warrant to run these kinds of tests. But the Constitution does not apply to private employers: Instead of drug tests, a company could surreptitiously check for illegal drug use by its employees by analyzing computer keyboards after the workers have gone home, for instance.Hmmm.... Perhaps the sale of plastic gloves should be banned. At least to minors! posted by Eric on 08.08.08 at 08:44 AM
Comments
Coyoteblog recently had a video by a law prof on why you should never talk to the police, even if innocent, until you have spoken with a lawyer. So this type of testing has potential for abuse not just for invasiveness, but to convict you for lying to investigators, even if you didn't commit the original crime. (See Stewart, Martha. See also Libby, Scooter). Assistant Village Idiot · August 8, 2008 01:51 PM This is one reason I handle weapons, shoot guns, drink whiskey, have sex, visit strip clubs, and handle money every chance I get. SuperMike · August 8, 2008 04:44 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Nine Years
Touching Leave Barak Alone Democrats Praising McCain Muhammad Ali On The Canvas Obama's Favorite Positions More Carol McCain Shades of Cory Maye John McCain YouTube Hero Changing Grove Parc
Links
Site Credits
|
|
[quote]Instead of drug tests, a company could surreptitiously check for illegal drug use by its employees by analyzing computer keyboards after the workers have gone home, for instance.[/quote]
I saw that movie.