Touching

Super snooping technology is on the rise, as I just learned via an emailed link to a piece about "Desi" -- a new fingerprinting technology that can discern whatever you have touched:

With a new analytical technique, a fingerprint can now reveal much more than the identity of a person. It can now also identify what the person has been touching: drugs, explosives or poisons, for example.
It can probably reveal even more than that -- what you've eaten, who you've had sex with (and maybe what kind of sex....), whether you've handled weapons. In short, your entire, um, lifestyle.
Writing in Friday's issue of the journal Science, R. Graham Cooks, a professor of chemistry at Purdue University, and his colleagues describe how a laboratory technique, mass spectrometry, could find a wider application in crime investigations.

The equipment to perform such tests is already commercially available, although prohibitively expensive for all but the largest crime laboratories. Smaller, cheaper, portable versions of such analyzers are probably only a couple of years away.

From a courtroom drama perspective, what's really cool about this is that not only does it find the incriminating evidence, but it shows the it neatly framed in a fingerprint:
Because the spatial resolution is on the order of the width of a human hair, the Desi technique did not just detect the presence of, for instance, cocaine, but literally showed a pattern of cocaine in the shape of the fingerprint, leaving no doubt who had left the cocaine behind.
Kewl!

Fortunately, we live in a free country where the police would need a search warrant to run these kinds of tests.

But the Constitution does not apply to private employers:

Instead of drug tests, a company could surreptitiously check for illegal drug use by its employees by analyzing computer keyboards after the workers have gone home, for instance.
Hmmm....

Perhaps the sale of plastic gloves should be banned.

At least to minors!

posted by Eric on 08.08.08 at 08:44 AM





TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://classicalvalues.com/cgi-bin/pings.cgi/7012






Comments

[quote]Instead of drug tests, a company could surreptitiously check for illegal drug use by its employees by analyzing computer keyboards after the workers have gone home, for instance.[/quote]
I saw that movie.

CaptDMO   ·  August 8, 2008 10:32 AM

Coyoteblog recently had a video by a law prof on why you should never talk to the police, even if innocent, until you have spoken with a lawyer.
http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2008/07/learning-to-lov.html
One of the reasons for this: a)they are asking about selling cocaine b)you deny ever even being near cocaine c)they prove you have used cocaine d)a jury might not believe you and convict you of selling cocaine, even if you didn't.

So this type of testing has potential for abuse not just for invasiveness, but to convict you for lying to investigators, even if you didn't commit the original crime. (See Stewart, Martha. See also Libby, Scooter).

Assistant Village Idiot   ·  August 8, 2008 01:51 PM

This is one reason I handle weapons, shoot guns, drink whiskey, have sex, visit strip clubs, and handle money every chance I get.
When they falsely accuse me of some tawdry crime based on faulty trace physical evidence, everyone will say,"If you're surprised that he has traces of gunpowder, cocaine (another article saying it's on practically every dollar bill just popped up again), whiskey, beer, blood, bodily fluids, grease, and bar-be-que on his hands, then you just don't know SuperMike"

SuperMike   ·  August 8, 2008 04:44 PM

Post a comment

You may use basic HTML for formatting.





Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)



August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

ANCIENT (AND MODERN)
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR


Search the Site


E-mail




Classics To Go

Classical Values PDA Link



Archives




Recent Entries



Links



Site Credits