|
August 25, 2008
Rachel Hoffman Drug War Casualty
Reason Magazine has an early report. Earlier this year, police in Tallahassee, Florida raided the home of college student Rachel Hoffman, who friends say was a bit of a hippie-ish free spirit, and concede that she shared and sold small amounts of marijuana and MDMA within her social circle. Hoffman was at the time undergoing state-forced drug treatment after police found 20+ grams of marijuana in her car during a traffic stop. The raid turned up another five ounces of marijuana, plus six ecstasy pills and assorted pot-related paraphernalia.I think Radly Balko has it totally correct when he says it is Proving once again that the most dangerous thing about illicit drugs like ecstasy and marijuana isn't the drugs themselves. It's what the government does to you after you're caught with them.Watch the videos here or at ABC News. The police chief is obviously scum of the earth. How does the man live with himself? And will he or the other police involved be prosecuted for breaking the rules? Don't make me laugh. Worse, don't make me cry. Rachel's Parents intend to use the tragedy of their daughters death to get the laws changed. Including decriminalization of marijuana. The Tribune noted that "Mike Weiss, Hoffman's stepfather, said he wants police to stop saying Hoffman broke protocol He asked how Hoffman could understand how important protocol is and how an untrained civilian could understand how to protect herself in such a situation. 'The reality is, untrained civilians of any age should not be put in that position by a police force,' he said. 'They took a 23-year-old relatively naive person and put her in a life-threatening situation.' Hoffman's mother, Margie Weiss, said she is forming a foundation to push for a requirement for confidential informants to seek legal advice before consenting to undercover work. It also would work to get marijuana convictions decriminalized. 'Her death will make history,' she said. 'It's a great loss. The only way I can make sense of it is by now having her memory live on.'Good for them. It is the best way to honor their daughter and all the children of America. It is a crime that we are chasing down people and putting them in jail or in the case of Rachel killing them for a drug that is safer than aspirin. Insane doesn't even begin to cover it. Criminal is more like it. posted by Simon on 08.25.08 at 04:02 AM
Comments
Shhh, Brett, you're not supposed to mention the 9th (or the 10th) amendment. The Supreme Court doesn't believe they exist. In fact, most of the fundamental rules of constitutional analysis depend on us not noticing those two amendments. In my opinion, police and politicians are lucky the constitution defines treason so narrowly, because in my mind this crime against the constitution and the people of this nation is treason and should be dealt with as such. tim maguire · August 25, 2008 10:29 AM I will not debate the fairness or unfairness of the current batch of drug laws. I find that tends to scratch an unpleasant side of most people. However, the law is the law. Knowing that the substances are illegal does not abrogate a citizens responsibility. This is the old 'if you can't do the time, don't do the crime'. Don't like the law? Change it. I would add that it is never a good idea to talk to the police, EVER! If you are arrested, lawyer up. Please see the attached link for a good explanation as to why. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865 Robohobo · August 25, 2008 03:22 PM Robohobo, if you discuss the fairness or unfairness of the current batch of drug laws in anything like the style in which you don't discuss it, it's hardly surprising that people's unpleasant side gets scratched. She had it coming. That's your position? tim maguire · August 25, 2008 05:29 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Obama supports genocide -- against black people?
Just one more layer to the conspiracy! Applying "unfair" fairness to unfair comparisons Denver Is Only One Mile High Rachel Hoffman Drug War Casualty US Flotilla Transits Turkey Arrives In Georgia Another day, another uncomfortable "association" Defying the forces of shame? Obama Chicago Gang Connection? Ask The Iraqis
Links
Site Credits
|
|
Darn right it's criminal. Most of the legislation on the books is unconstitutional in fact, as opposed to any judges opinion to the contrary.
Substance prohibitions are unconstitutional under the Ninth Amendment.
In a just world, every legislator who set this stupid tyranny up would be in jail, as would every cop who never refused to enforce it. The citizens who approve of it should never be allowed to vote again.
Criminals.