|
August 10, 2008
Guerilla marketing. It's more than a Che Guevara product line!
Would Barack Obama ever dare to attempt a nationwide smoking ban? Richard Miniter thinks it is possible. It occurrs to me that if something like that were seriously proposed, it would take a considerable amount of time to implement. This might offer a nice business opportunity for some political guerilla marketing, and I already came up with a crude design: Notwithstanding the restrictions on cigarette advertising, I'd like to see stuff like that on billboards. The nexus between commercial speech and political speech intrigues me, and I think the lower standard of constitutional protection traditionally afforded commercial speech might have to yield when political advocacy is involved. Or how about a "heritage" line of "protest ads" recycling images like this: Seriously, if I can put a "BUSH IS HITLER" sign in my front yard, why not a Marlboro ad? I mean, don't angry, embattled smokers have just as much a right to advocate and express their position as the people who seek to make criminals out of them? Such things constitute politics, right? And we still live in a free country, right? posted by Eric on 08.10.08 at 09:16 AM
Comments
If the Tyrannt bans smoking what will the nasty leeches suck off of to get the money for their free health care? "the majority of the American people have been schooled out of an understanding of the principles of liberty upon which the United States was founded." Isn't it time to end the practice of tenure since it serves only to protect the multitude of worthless, brain damaging college Professors? syn · August 10, 2008 11:25 AM I don't understand the ban on smoking. Christopher Hamilton · August 10, 2008 11:37 AM I read through the comments on Richard Miniter’s site. They are similar to those that have been posted elsewhere -- health and SMELL. When exactly did tobacco smoke come to smell so uniquely vile? Worse than any other possible smell? Only one generation ago, one would have been hard put to find many people who were so thoroughly revolted by a mere whiff of tobacco smoke. It seems that the campaign against tobacco has created an entire mindset, just the sort of “gut reaction” that one would want to instill if one were attempting to create a groundswell of revulsion against something. What is next? In a few years will car exhaust give everyone headaches? Will the smell of a sizzling Big Mac make people sick? Anonymous · August 10, 2008 04:25 PM Damn betcha, Anon. I have seen children being taught to "cough" whenever they recognize the smell of smoke. I'm expecting to see little "sample puffs" soon, like the bag of oregano Officer Dare used to bring to class so you'd know what it looked like. Never forget that Jim Crow and forced segregation arrived after slavery ended. Given state monopoly of education, science, and the "opinion-making process," you can get about 7/8 of the people to outlaw any old thing. We will all have our turn in the barrel. comatus · August 10, 2008 08:21 PM "Worse than any other possible smell" Vegan farts, now that is a vile smell. syn · August 11, 2008 07:14 AM "Smoking controls the population." So will AIDS, why then are billions spent to find a cure when all that needs to be done is to put on a condom?
syn · August 11, 2008 07:20 AM When exactly did tobacco smoke come to smell so uniquely vile? Somewhere around the time daily bathing and perfumed grooming products became the cultural ideal. Cigarette smoke is a great cover for BO--yours or cubemate's. (I don't understand why people think they have a right not to breathe cigarette smoke when I don't have a right not to breathe diesel fumes belched out by city buses with one or two passengers. I'm sure someone will enlighten me.) Heather · August 11, 2008 11:40 AM Having been raised in sawmill and logging camps where everything ran on diesel, I love the smell of those fumes. I don't know what greyhound does to their bus engines, but those things do stink. It's perfumed beauty products I could do without. Oh, and sickly sweet perfumed "cleaning" products used by owners of older motels to cover up the smell of mildew, mold, and rot. I'm one of those rare smokers with an intensely sensitive nose. I can smell the smoke on my clothes and in my house, but it doesn't bother me the way a vanilla scented candle does. Donna B. · August 11, 2008 02:14 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
"Going for the jugular" (And reaching for the checkbook....)
Ask The French For Help Obama Eats His Waffle A Proud American Guerilla marketing. It's more than a Che Guevara product line! On Her Six Picken Apart Pickens Blazing Economies Market Break Money Doesn't Matter
Links
Site Credits
|
|
I love this issue: the blind support for the persecution of smoking proves my point that the majority of the American people have been schooled out of an understanding of the principles of liberty upon which the United States was founded.
I also know not to waste my time discussing anything with anyone who supports this national disgrace: he is merely a fascist whose opinions on other issues will be similarly tyrannical, and I have never seen such change his mind in the face of superior argument. He cannot reform because his personal vanity is involved, seeing as he believes his personal preferences are moral imperatives requiring the submission of all.
I do hope the Age of Tolerance for our overschooled rulers will come to an end. At the very least, the enablers of the progressive reduction of individual liberty should be hosed out of the public trough.