|
August 09, 2008
Explain this "war" if you can
Dennis was absolutely right to observe that I "would have posted something on this story if [I] weren't still hip deep in the big move to Michigan." The story (involving a mayor and his wife who were apparently mailed a package of marijuana as part of a scam, then subjected to a gruesome home invasion in which their dogs were killed by a cowardly SWAT agents who doubtless consider themselves "warriors") is an absolute outrage. The word "warriors" is in quotes because I think the war on drugs is a perversion of warfare -- which is supposed to involve mutual combat. The drug "war" simply involves government forces attacking civilians. While this case attracted attention mainly because it involved a mayor, it is yet another numbing example of deadly police state tactics being deployed against non-violent "suspects" in the war against human appetites, and it's just outrageous. We are all at risk. Anyone can mail a package to anyone, just as anyone's home can be raided because of a bureaucratic mistake. No violent crime, no threat to the public safety, is necessary to trigger deadly force. Because, while drug crimes do not involve violence (and not legitimate targets of violent home invasions) these days, the innocent have everything to fear. Think you can defend yourself? Think again. As Dennis pointed out, still sits in prison because a cop knocked down the wrong door in the middle of the night. He had received the death penalty for defending himself, but the ruling was overturned.When these things happen, people get angry, and perhaps out of a sense of hopeless rage, they resort to Nazi comparisons, as did the mayor's neighbor: Robert Kovalchik, a neighbor and Calvo's high school history teacher at Parkdale High School, said he was shocked that county officials had not apologized.I don't think the raid itself would be evocative of Nazi Germany if there were a way to hold rogue SWAT officers accountable for their thuggish conduct. No system is ever perfect, and mistakes can happen anywhere and at any time. It's the callused lack of accountability that resembles totalitarianism. Frankly, it scares the crap out of me that these things keep recurring: Calvo said he wants federal officials to examine policies that he said have led Prince George's police officials to serve warrants on wrong addresses and kill family pets before.I think such victims should be awarded punitive damages against the officers and the county. Perhaps if governments realized they could be bankrupted, they'd be more careful. Anyway, while I didn't have time to blog about this until now, I did have time for a standard, garden variety conversation about it of the sort I've had before, because I want to understand what drives the drug war mindset. However, I find that it comes down to two completely different and irreconcilable mindsets. One mindset really cares about the personal immorality of other people, and wants to use government to police it, and the other which either doesn't care, or else (as in my case) doesn't think it's the government's business. What I have never, ever been able to understand is why people care so much that they want to use state violence to police unhealthy or immoral appetites. To understand why people think the way they do, I try to put myself in their position, and in a case like this, I have to ask, simply, Why should I care whether my neighbor smokes pot? Why would I care? Can anyone help? Seriously, I might as well care about his personal sex life. Or what he eats. Unless he's eating human victims or screwing children, it just doesn't make sense for me to care. Well, in the sense that I might care about anyone's health issues I might care, but not enough to invoke the power of the state. Even if he weighed 600 lbs., I don't believe in jailing people for gluttony. Unless he's threatening my safety or keeping me awake, or else he's my friend and comes to me for advice or something, my neighbor's lifestyle and health issues just aren't my business or concern. Nor are mine his. What is it that makes people think they should be? It's an important question, for it's what drives the "war on drugs," and other misguided "wars" to reform humanity. From a religious perspective, I realize we're all sinners (although I can't find marijuana in the Ten Commandments), but that doesn't quite explain the mystery. UPDATE: Richard Miniter looks at the related issue of outdoor (yes I am serious) smoking bans, and thinks the problem comes down to Puritanism: Puritans are people who want to live according to a strict moral code of their own devising and want to make you live their way too.Above all, they seem psychologically incapable of minding their own business. As Miniter notes, modern, godless Puritans are no longer constrained by having to come up with religious rationalizations: ...The modern form, what I call"hippie-Puritanism," has one innovation: it is godless. That means that the last check of Puritan ambition is gone. With God went the idea that other people are ends, not means. The rest of us are simply extras in their private movie of moral vanity.Once again, I don't smoke, but these crackpots make me feel like brandishing cigarettes. Even where smoking is banned, there's still a right to carry. UPDATE: Professor Bainbridge comments on the double standard, noting that this case mainly received attention because it might have happened to reporters. ...The Washington Post or NY Times reporters look at this case and immediately think: "It could happen to me!" So the story gets saturation coverage--even in Great Britain!Via Glenn Reynolds, who adds, Indeed. Look how little traction the Cory Maye case has gotten, outside of blogs and Reason magazine.One of the many ironies of the "war on drugs" is that so many people are willing to turn a blind eye as long as it doesn't happen in their neighborhood. This smug elitism borders on outright racism, and reminds me of the memorable line from Don Zaluchi in The Godfather: ...In my city, we would keep the traffic in the dark people, the coloreds. They're animals anyway, so let them lose their souls.A hell of a way to run (or report) a war.... MORE: Speaking of animals, am I alone in noticing that when police shoot dogs in these raids, the amount of sympathy generated depends on whether it's the "right" breed of dog? "A Labrador?" "Why, that could happen to my dog!" But don't other dog owners love their dogs? (I point this out only because it's tough for me to forget Coco can be shot by the police with impunity -- simply because she's a "pit bull.") posted by Eric on 08.09.08 at 09:57 AM
Comments
You know, you're right and I really should help you spread the message, but I'd rather smoke pot and bugger my dog in it's rear end. Get back to me later when you can provide as much fun as that. Some guy · August 9, 2008 01:30 PM Eric, what we really have here is two separate issues, IMHO. We have the War on (Some) Drugs, and then we have an increasingly unaccountable criminal justice system. These cops and the procedures they follow, come from the same mindset that produced Mike Nifong in NC: peasants, we are in charge here, and whatever we choose to do isn't yours to question. SDN · August 9, 2008 03:20 PM Sorry, SG, but your dog can't consent! If you were serious and not anonymous, I'd sic the animal cops on you. Eric Scheie · August 9, 2008 04:14 PM Eric, I have not read "Liberal Facism", have you? I ask, because the mindset that brought about prohibition against alcohol was surely a progressive/liberal one, and I was curious if Goldberg coverd the subject. It is surely now time to start accusing those who support the War on Drugs as being Progressive Facists, because that is what they are. JSinAZ · August 9, 2008 05:29 PM How would you respond if I told you that when my dog and I get high, I'm convinced that he tells me he considers himself to be my common-law wife? Some guy · August 9, 2008 06:41 PM Some guy, I hope you two are very happy. JSinAZ · August 9, 2008 07:52 PM I think some guy's dog needs counseling. Anonymous · August 10, 2008 09:29 AM I know what that abused dog is thinking. It is what abused dogs everywhere think. "If only I licked his ....... he would really love me." M. Simon · August 11, 2008 08:20 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Ask The French For Help
Obama Eats His Waffle A Proud American Guerilla marketing. It's more than a Che Guevara product line! On Her Six Picken Apart Pickens Blazing Economies Market Break Money Doesn't Matter Explain this "war" if you can
Links
Site Credits
|
|
As much as I detest the War on Drugs, I have to recognize that Global Islamic Jihadists are in the Global Street Drug business.
I'm sure if DEA could have the authority, training and money cleaning up places like Mexico, Venezuela, Albania, and Toronto, Canada they would not be waste tim, money and civil liberites going after non-violent consumers.