|
August 27, 2008
Ephemeral thoughts on Glenn Reynolds' birthday
It's August 27, which according to astrological tradition, is Glenn Reynolds' birthday. So HAPPY BIRTHDAY GLENN! While I'll spare readers my customary "666" nonsense (as well as evil shirts and crossed swords), I will note that on this date last year, Coco was in heat on Glenn's birthday, and in the middle of amorous pursuits. This year she's a bit more subdued.... I can't blame her. Maybe I should devote more time to topics more in line with the purported classical traditions of this blog. Like astrology, for example. As today is the birthday of the blogfather, what could be more relevant than, say, a look at what the planets were doing on the day of Glenn Reynolds' birth? Here's a scan of an official ephemeris for August, 1960: To see Glenn's aspects, you have to scroll down, you have to know what you're doing as an investigative astrologer (most importantly, you need to know the exact time of day of his birth), and above all, you have to believe! Now, there's no way Coco could find any of that boring. Furthermore, not only does it fit with the classical theme of this blog, but the classical theme also ties in with the politics of today! That's right. Barack Obama has decided to deliver his speech from a miniature Greek temple! I kid you not: DENVER (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's big speech on Thursday night will be delivered from an elaborate columned stage resembling a miniature Greek temple.Wow. That's so classical, it might even be classical plagiarism. But it's not all that original, because the Romans plagiarized the Greeks centuries before Obama's natal chart was even a hint of an appearance of a future aspect. One of these days I'll have to check out Obama's ephemeris. (Presumably, it's not a forgery....) Hey, come on folks, get with the program. This is not just about Glenn Reynolds. Or Coco. Or even classical themes. Lots of people care deeply about such issues. I mean, like, check this out: The astrological chart of Barack Obama shows he is a Leo. It isn't simply a matter of his having the Sun in Leo, although he does. The Sun is also strongly dignified; has no dispositor detracting from it and is the hyleg according to Bonatti's method of calculation. And he also has Mercury in Leo.Mercury in Leo? I thought the Democrats wanted to get Mercury out of everything. (Sorry, but the environment is a serious issue, and I take it seriously.) It all has to do with why Obama wants to rule the world! Even those people with only a small allocation of Leo want to rule the world, although that might be only the small world they live in. Of course, not everyone can. In this case, the big question on everyone's mind is whether Obama has enough of that leonine energy to make him an effective leader in the bigger world.Well, none of that was mentioned in Hillary's speech last night. And I think it's being systematically kept out of the mainstream media too. Uh, oh. Looking closely at Glenn's ephemeris, I see that he too has (gulp!) Mercury in Leo. Well, I guess someone has to rule the world.... (If you think this is bad, I happen to have a very valuable book which really has the lowdown on Obama's Sun-Moon combination. Depending on the time of day he was born, his profile is titled either "The High and Mighty" or "The Con Artist," and yes I am serious. Glenn is either "The Tranquilizer" or "The Sly Fox," but as I don't know the time of day of his birth I'll stay the hell out of it. There are some things we're better off not knowing....) MORE: Speaking of faux Greek temples, Glenn accuses those who do not like them of being "homophobes." Worse yet, in another post he goes out of his way to promote the beastly 666 meme. Tranquilizer? Or Sly Fox? He may take many forms. Beware! MORE: There's been a lot of discussion about the appearance of Obama's faux Greek temple. From the looks of the picture here, I think it looks a lot like the Greek Theater in Berkeley: Wouldn't be the first time the Dems have plagiarized Berkeley. And yes, anyone who doesn't like it is probably a homophobe! posted by Eric on 08.27.08 at 10:37 AM
Comments
Is there any significance to the fact that my dad shares Glenn's birthday? Dennis · August 27, 2008 01:06 PM Hmmm... I'm afraid the cosmic significance involved is above my pay grade. But please wish your dad a very happy birthday from me, Dennis! Eric Scheie · August 27, 2008 02:32 PM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
August 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSAAGOP Skepticism See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Back to the Clintons
Only a bigot would oppose gay marriage! An Idea Bomb Ephemeral thoughts on Glenn Reynolds' birthday Covering A Convention Obama Has Friends Ayers Airs Opinion On Kerry Where There Is Truth There Is Fire Diplomacy By Other Means "Hillary is right!"
Links
Site Credits
|
|
The stars in the Milky Way aka the "Galaxy" that are so painstakenly studed for zodiacal prognostications are, dujour, unreliable.
They have moved so much since the time they were invented in Meospotamia as to be present in an array/positiong that little resembles the creators geometry - and the source of information for these horoscopes.
Besides, the "fault lies not in our stars, but within our selves."