|
June 08, 2008
What Counts?
This is a roundup on what is wrong with our voting system. Brad Friedman tries to vote. He had a lot of problems. Fortunately he was wired with the California Secretary of State's office. This was not his first problem with voting irregularities. It was his first personal experience. The comment section (from which I have cribbed some urls) is good too. Brad also discusses Why 'Vote-by-Mail' Elections are a Terrible Idea for Democracy. Thanks to Instapundit for that first link. Juris-imprudence is very interesting in showing how to take back control of government by ordinary citizens. This bit on Grand Juries [opens a doc] was especially interesting. I really like Black Box Voting for their coverage of the issues. I did a bit on them (basically a reprint of one of their www pages) at Black Box Voting. Vote Fraud And Election Issues is maintained by The Equal Justice Foundation. They seem to be libertarian oriented. Their page on the Drug War proves it (as far as proof is possible without a direct statement). They have an article by Harry Browne. Bill Hobbs talks about election irregularities in 2004. This site looks at the Presidential Election of 2004. Prison Planet says that there is Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire. They have another report Vote Fraud Expert Warns Of New Hampshire Chicanery. They mention Black Box Voting, which is a good thing. There is even a book out by John Fund Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy. He says it is not a party specific problem. Here is a very nice history lesson: Origins of American Vote Fraud. He says it is the Republicans. I think he is probably right. At least about what went on during and after the Civil War. Which may explain the rise of the KKK. In February 1867 Tennessee enfranchised freedmen, and Republicans established local chapters of the Union League, a political arm of the party, to mobilize the new black voters. In some respects the KKK became the conservative ex-Confederates' answer to the Union League, a rallying point for white Democrats determined to drive freedmen, Republicans, and their allies from the polls. During the spring of 1867 the KKK's innocent beginnings began to give way to intimidation and violence as some of its members sought to keep freedmen in their traditional place.Now isn't that interesting. The Klan was a response to Republican depredations. Something you don't hear much about in most history books. I think that may provide some good background for my 2005 article Dems revert to Klan roots. Well, that was an interesting digression. Now back to vote fraud. I think all this points to an essential feature of the internet age. Distance is no longer a barrier to the transport of information. Small groups of interested parties can band together exchange useful information and then get things done. Some one wrote a book about it. Cross Posted at Power and Control posted by Simon on 06.08.08 at 11:59 AM
Comments
Good sir, it is not "what" counts, it is "who." Bleepless · June 8, 2008 09:02 PM Yes, as usual we focus our attention on vague accusations of voter suppression or isolated slip-ups, when it is the vulnerability to massive fraud that we should be concerned with. The fact that the reports of actual fraud concerning the machines turn out to be weak and highly speculative lulls us into a false sense of security. Assistant Village Idiot · June 9, 2008 11:37 AM The Klan was a response to Republican depredations. Something you don't hear much about in most history books. Birth of a Nation wasn't shy about making the point. It's not surprise that both parties engage in voter fraud, but rooting it out won't be easy when partisans on both sides only care about the fraud perpetrated by the other side. tim maguire · June 9, 2008 05:36 PM There are still older Texans (and presumably other southerners) who are very conservative on all the issues yet still vote Democrat because grandpa told them about all the abuses during the Reconstruction era, which was run by Republicans. Michael McCullough · June 10, 2008 01:22 AM Post a comment
You may use basic HTML for formatting.
|
|
June 2008
WORLD-WIDE CALENDAR
Search the Site
E-mail
Classics To Go
Archives
June 2008
May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 May 2002 AB 1634 MBAPBSALLAMERICANGOP See more archives here Old (Blogspot) archives
Recent Entries
Global bloggers invade peaceful village
The Discomfort Of Ignorance The commissariat of inclusion VooDoo Child running to beat all records! Hell hath no fury like an independent male sexist pig scorned? Misdiagnosis ITER Is The Fusion Reactor Of The Future Deviation Isn't What It Used To Be Bring back "fairness"! Stop the hate! And save the children!
Links
Site Credits
|
|
According to DiLorenzo (the author of the piece you cited), the culprit was Lincoln.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo82.html
The practical problem with DiLorenzo's approach is that Lincoln has been deified, and America does not take kindly to attacks on its long-established deities.
More on the debate:
http://www.liberty-page.com/cliches/lincoln.html